SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Ryerson A, Benard V. 1991-2002 National Report: Summarizing the First 12 Years of Partnerships and Progress Against Breast and Cervical Cancer 2003. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/publications/nbccedp.htm. Accessed October 9, 2013.
  • 2
    Richardson LC, Royalty J, Howe W, Helsel W, Kamerer W, Benard VB. Timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1996-2005. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:1769-1776.
  • 3
    Benard VB, Howe W, Saraiya M, Helsel W, Lawson HW. Assessment of follow-up for low-grade cytological abnormalities in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2000-2005. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2008;12:300-306.
  • 4
    Ekwueme DU, Hall IJ, Richardson LC, Gardner JG, Royalty J, Thompson TD. Estimating personal costs incurred by a woman participating in mammography screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Cancer. 2008;113:592-601.
  • 5
    Eheman CR, Benard VB, Blackman D, et al. Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17:29-38.
  • 6
    Tangka FK, Dalaker J, Chattopadhyay SK, et al. Meeting the mammography screening needs of underserved women: the performance of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in 2002-2003 (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17:1145-1154.
  • 7
    Benard VB, Lawson HW, Eheman CR, Anderson C, Helsel W. Adherence to guidelines for follow-up of low-grade cytologic abnormalities among medically underserved women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:1323-1328.
  • 8
    Benard VB, Eheman CR, Lawson HW, et al. Cervical screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1995-2001. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:564-571.
  • 9
    American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 2nd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 1995.
  • 10
    Kurman RJ, Malkasian GD, Sedlis A, Soloman D. From Papanicolaou to Bethesda: the rationale for a new cervical cytologic classification. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:779-782.
  • 11
    Research Triangle Institute. SUDAAN Release 10.0 [computer software]. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 2008.
  • 12
    Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA. 2003;290:2129-2137.
  • 13
    Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;287:2114-2119.