Fax: (734) 763-4095
Ancillary techniques on direct-smear aspirate slides
A significant evolution for cytopathology techniques
Article first published online: 11 JUL 2012
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society
Volume 121, Issue 3, pages 120–128, March 2013
How to Cite
Knoepp, S. M. and Roh, M. H. (2013), Ancillary techniques on direct-smear aspirate slides. Cancer Cytopathology, 121: 120–128. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21214
- Issue published online: 13 MAR 2013
- Article first published online: 11 JUL 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 16 MAY 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 15 MAY 2012
- Manuscript Received: 4 APR 2012
- direct smear;
- cell block;
- fine-needle aspiration;
- polymerase chain reaction;
- personalized medicine
Numerous cytologic techniques aimed at effectively acquiring patient material for molecular testing have been proposed. Such techniques are becoming ever more important in an age of personalized medicine. In this commentary, the authors explored some more commonly proposed techniques to aid in the molecular testing of cytologic specimens. These techniques include the use of cell blocks, direct cytologic smears, filter paper storage, frozen samples, and enriched cellular techniques such as ThinPrep and cytospin preparations. Direct-smeared slides demonstrate excellent preservation of DNA, are easy to prepare, and are amenable to immediate adequacy at the time of the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) procedure as well as effective subsequent tumor purity estimation. Cell block methods cannot be assessed at the time of FNA and often demonstrate insufficiency, whereas filter paper and frozen techniques do not allow for the direct assessment of the presence and purity of tumor cells in the sample. Direct-smeared slides are emerging as the most effective preparation and storage medium of cytologic material to be used for molecular testing. Their cost-effectiveness, ease of use, and reliability have cemented them as the optimal solution for cytopathologists to fulfill the role of providing advanced molecular testing on patient samples. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.
With the increasing emphasis placed on personalized medicine in today's modern health care systems, pathologists are experiencing steady increases in the number of requests for molecular testing on patient specimens. DNA-based mutational analyses are aimed at detecting molecular aberrations in tumors that may portend response to targeted therapeutics. Not surprisingly, such testing becomes most relevant in patients with high-stage, surgically unresectable malignant disease. In this context, smaller biopsies associated with minimal complications are desirable for the patient. Cytologic fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) are especially useful in this regard because they represent a rapid, efficient, and minimally invasive means with which to sample superficial and deep-seated lesions. Accordingly, cytopathologists are often called on to serve as liaisons between clinicians, oncologists, and molecular pathologists by facilitating molecular testing on FNA samples. Although molecular testing on FNA samples is not a novel notion, the increasing variety and complexity of tests has created both challenges and opportunities for cytopathologists.1, 2 Cytopathologists are expected to implement the most optimal sample collection methods and workflow techniques and serve as advisers to clinicians in selecting appropriate molecular tests.
The principal goal of this commentary is to discuss the direct-smeared slide as an optimal platform for preparing small patient biopsies for subsequent molecular testing. To facilitate this goal, it is first helpful to present the following 3 objectives: 1) to make the case for FNA as the optimal procedure for initial sample acquisition; 2) to briefly consider select examples of current and future molecular techniques that may be routinely requested using cytologic specimens; and 3) to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various other platforms (eg, cell blocks, Whatman filter paper cards, frozen specimens, and cellular enrichment techniques) for performing molecular tests.
Use of FNA to Aid in the Molecular Analysis of Patient Samples
Although FNA and core needle biopsy (CNB) represent complementary methods for obtaining tissue from both palpable and nonpalpable lesions, the use of FNA to acquire target DNA is advantageous over CNB in several respects: 1) FNA can sample a wider area of the lesion; 2) FNA allows for the acquisition of tumor cells with lower contamination by stromal tissue; and, most importantly, 3) FNA allows for rapid on-site adequacy assessments and the communication of preliminary diagnoses to the clinical care providers.2 Cytopathologists who provide on-site assistance during FNAs are therefore not only in a unique position to triage freshly obtained material for ancillary tests, but also to ensure that enough material has been gathered for molecular analysis while the patient is still accessible. In addition to molecular polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based studies, other ancillary tests facilitated by on-site assessments include immunocytochemistry (ICC), conventional cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), flow cytometry, and microbiologic culture.
Selected Existing and Emerging Molecular Studies Applied to FNA Specimens
The repertoire of molecular tests applied to nongynecologic cytology specimens is steadily growing.1, 2 Salient examples include PCR-based and FISH-based assays to determine the presence of specific gene rearrangements in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and soft tissue neoplasms, including small round blue cell tumors.3-9 In addition, FISH-based assays have served as valuable adjuncts in the diagnosis of urothelial cell carcinomas and the determination of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu gene amplification in patients with breast cancer.10, 11
Thyroid FNAs play a crucial role in the preoperative assessment of thyroid nodules and the triaging of patients for surgical management.12 Recently, the application of ancillary molecular studies to thyroid FNAs has exploited the currently understood molecular genetic aberrations associated with thyroid follicular neoplasms.13 For example, an activating mutation in BRAF resulting in the V600E substitution is present in nearly one-half of papillary thyroid carcinomas, and the RET-PTC and paired box gene-8–peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PAX8-PPARγ) translocations are found in approximately 20% and 35%, respectively, of papillary thyroid carcinomas and follicular carcinomas. Point mutations in RAS proto-oncogenes are noted in a variety of thyroid neoplasms, including papillary thyroid carcinoma, follicular carcinoma, and follicular adenomas.
The application of molecular genetic assays to examine thyroid FNA material for the above mutations has shown that the presence of any one of these mutations is strongly indicative of malignancy on surgical follow-up.14 Molecular testing particularly improves the predictive value of thyroid FNAs in which an indeterminate (ie, atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance) diagnosis is rendered.15-17 Therefore, molecular testing can serve an important role in these cases.
Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma FNAs
Specific chemotherapeutic agents for lung cancer are available for the 2 most common subtypes of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC): adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SQC). A recent phase 3 study demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma who were treated with the combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed versus those treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine.18 In contrast, the combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine was found to be superior to that of cisplatin and pemetrexed for patients with SQC. FNAs of lung adenocarcinoma are triaged, at increasing frequency, for further molecular mutational analysis of the receptor tyrosine kinase, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and KRAS, and rearrangements involving the gene encoding the tyrosine kinase, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK).19, 20 These mutations are mutually exclusive. Patients with adenocarcinomas harboring EGFR mutations are candidates for treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as erlotinib and gefitinib. Recently, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib has been approved as targeted therapy for patients with lung adenocarcinomas harboring ALK rearrangements.20 Hence, ensuring adequate lesional material during FNAs for the specific subclassification of NSCLC and subsequent molecular testing is paramount.
Routine cytomorphology is often sufficient to distinguish between pulmonary adenocarcinoma and SQC. Nonetheless, in a subset of cases, the distinction is difficult and ICC can be useful for the subclassification of these NSCLCs. Adenocarcinomas often express napsin A and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) and are usually negative for cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 and p63.21 Conversely, SQCs are typically negative for napsin A and TTF-1, whereas they are virtually always immunoreactive for CK5/6 and p63.
FNA represents a minimally invasive means with which to establish a tissue diagnosis of metastatic melanoma, allowing for accurate staging and prompt clinical management. ICC for S-100, HMB-45, and melan-A/Melanoma Antigen Recognized by T cells (MART-1) can be applied to challenging cases to confirm the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma. Recently, investigators have found that approximately 40% to 50% of melanomas harbor activating mutations in BRAF; V600E and V600K represent the 2 most common mutations.22-24 Because vemurafenib has recently been approved for the treatment of patients with advanced stage melanomas harboring BRAF mutations, there is increased attention to molecular diagnostic assays designed to detect these mutations in FNA samples from patients with melanoma.
Platforms Used for the Performance of Molecular Studies
Various techniques for sample collection for molecular tests have been used, either as a routine part of the FNA procedure or as a separately collected banked sample (Table 1). Each has unique features that can be assessed for suitability with subsequent molecular testing.
|Technique||Ability to Directly Visualize Sample?||Amenable to On-Site Adequacy Assessment?||Ability to Assess Tumor Purity?||Ability to Split Sample for Multiple Ancillary Tests?|
|Direct smears||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes, limited|
|Fresh frozen sample (microcentrifuge tube)||No||Yes||No||Yes|
|Filter paper (eg, Whatman filter paper cards)||No||Yes||No||Yes|
Cell blocks are traditionally used by many laboratories for the performance of ancillary ICC and molecular studies; they have notable advantages and weaknesses. The advantages of cell blocks include: 1) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue is treated similarly to that of traditional surgical pathology blocks; 2) multiple serial sections for ancillary studies may be prepared; and 3) a banked archive is maintained for future studies. The disadvantages of cell blocks include: 1) limited or no cellularity in a subset of cases; 2) an inability to assess cellularity and adequacy at the time of procedure; 3) the pooled nature of the sample; and 4) the possibility that deeper sections from the cell block may not contain the tumor cells observed on the originally prepared hematoxylin and eosin-stained slide. Of these, variability in cell block cellularity (ie, sparse cellularity or acellularity in a subset of cases) represents the most significant limitation. To examine this in our laboratory practice, we retrospectively analyzed the cellularity of cell blocks in 76 consecutive endobronchial ultrasound-guided FNAs performed at our institution that were diagnosed as being positive for malignancy. We observed that 28 (37%) cell blocks were acellular and an additional 15 (20%) cell blocks exhibited sparse/borderline cellularity (Fig. 1). Dedicated passes to enrich the cell block may help in some cases, but do not completely alleviate this limitation (Fig. 1). Compounding this issue, the ability to ensure adequate cellularity of the cell block at the time of the FNA procedure is not possible because processing is not usually complete until the following day. The third significant weakness of the cell block is that it represents a pooled specimen from multiple passes and therefore the tumor cell population from high-yield needle passes may be diluted by background benign elements in off-target needle passes. This is problematic because the analytic sensitivity of molecular diagnostic assays depends on a percentage tumor cellularity threshold, below which false-negative results will occur (ie, contaminating benign tissue will be negative for the molecular abnormality being tested). For example, in our molecular diagnostics laboratory, PCR-based assays designed to detect BRAF and KRAS mutations require a minimum percentage tumor cellularity of 10% and 30%, respectively. In published studies from our laboratory, we have noted 2 incidents in which a positive mutation result was obtained from tumor-enriched areas on direct smears whereas corresponding cell blocks in these 2 cases demonstrated false-negative results.25, 26
Filter Paper Storage or Fresh-Frozen Samples (Microcentrifuge Tube)
One innovative approach to the storage of samples for molecular studies involves aliquoting an amount of aspirated FNA material directly onto a small piece of filter paper, which can then be stored at room temperature until needed for molecular analysis. da Cunha Santos et al applied molecular diagnostic studies to FNA material from NSCLCs stored on Whatman filter paper cards, and demonstrated that high-quality DNA could be extracted from these cards after months of storage at room temperature.27 This method is advantageous because of the ease of setup and the low cost of reagents and storage conditions. However, a serious drawback still remains in that tumor purity and sample adequacy in the filter paper cards cannot be directly ascertained with certainty; there is a limited ability to determine whether adequate amounts of tumor cells were sequestered on the filter paper card because the cells cannot be observed. To determine whether adequate cells are present, one must examine a smear made from the same pass and extrapolate. Even in cases in which DNA is successfully extracted, it is not possible to determine with certainty the ratio of genetic material contributed by tumor cells and contaminating benign cellular elements because of the inability to directly observe the cells present on the filter paper cards.
Similar to the filter paper technique, an aliquot from the FNA specimen may be placed in a small tube containing cryopreservative and frozen for future use. This method helps to guarantee long-term stability, especially for RNA, which is much more vulnerable to hydrolytic degradation than DNA.28 Depending on the amount of cryopreserved material, an aliquot of the sample can be used, upon thawing, to prepare a Diff-Quik–stained cytospin slide. Nonetheless, if this is not performed and the frozen sample is directly submitted for molecular testing in its entirety, the similar limitations noted for the filter paper storage approach still apply (ie, the sample cannot be directly observed to ensure the presence and purity of tumor cells).
Routine Cytology Slides: Air-Dried and Alcohol-Fixed Direct Smears and Enriched Preparations
Routine cytology slides have the advantage that DNA is readily extractable and reasonably stable (ie, at least 6 months and up to and exceeding 5 years in some cases).29 Enriched slides such as ThinPrep or cytospin slides share some limitations with cell blocks: they are prepared from homogenized, pooled liquid-based samples derived from multiple passes and they are not available for the assessment of cellularity at the time of the procedure. Direct smears prepared on-site are not associated with these limitations. Freshly prepared, unstained direct smears may either be air-dried or fixed in alcohol and represent effective platforms for ICC and molecular studies.25, 26, 30-32 To observe tumor cells to ensure adequacy for DNA extraction for molecular studies, it is easiest to use stained slides. Although both alcohol-fixed Papanicolaou-stained smears and air-dried Diff-Quik–stained smears are suitable for DNA extraction, we prefer to use Diff-Quik staining because DNA appears to be better preserved. Specifically, a recent study by Killian et al suggests that Diff-Quik–stained smears can provide high-quality DNA even if archived for a prolonged period, allowing for the performance of sophisticated molecular diagnostic studies such as high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization assays.29 In this study, Killian et al observed DNA degradation as a function of age for archived Papanicolaou-stained smears.
Traditionally, during FNA procedures, each needle pass leads to the preparation of 2 smears: 1 that is air-dried for rapid Diff-Quik staining and another that is alcohol-fixed and subsequently stained using the Papanicolaou method (Fig. 2). However, depending on the amount of material that is aspirated, it is usually possible to generate additional smears (in our experience, at least 2 additional smears) per FNA pass (Fig. 2) (see Supplemental Video). The presence of tumor cells on the Diff-Quik–stained smear, determined during the on-site assessment of adequacy, can be used as an indicator of tumor cellularity on unstained direct smears resulting from the same pass. Nonetheless, because this represents an extrapolated approach, we prefer to assess the presence of tumor cells on the unstained direct smears by light microscopy. Specifically, the size and architectural configuration of the tumor cells in the unstained slides can be directly compared with the Diff-Quik–stained slides and this can be facilitated by flipping the condenser (Fig. 3). For slides destined for molecular studies, staining of an extra, unstained smear with Diff-Quik is preferable because the tumor cells can then be directly observed and selected for microdissection, DNA extraction, and molecular analysis (Fig. 4). For the purposes of tumor microdissection from smears, we routinely use the Pinpoint Slide DNA Isolation System (Zymo Research, Irvine, Calif). Regardless of the subsequent molecular test being performed, the use of smears for molecular testing is advantageous because the cellularity of the smears can be directly assessed at the time of the FNA. Areas of the smear enriched with tumor cells can be directly observed and microdissected, allowing for isolation of DNA. We and others have previously reported that EGFR and KRAS mutational analysis can be applied to stained cytologic smears of NSCLCs.26, 33-36 We have also successfully applied this methodology to Diff-Quik–stained smears of metastatic melanoma for BRAF mutational testing.26 Overall, we observed that fresh, noncoverslipped Diff-Quik–stained smears as well as archived smears, decoverslipped in xylene, are suitable for these purposes.25, 26
Extra unstained, air-dried direct smears also provide a robust source of material for ICC, which has been demonstrated in our laboratory.25, 30-32 In our practice, we routinely use positively charged slides for preparing smears; the use of positively charged slides for preparing unstained smears is particularly beneficial for enhancing cellular retention on the slides during processing for ICC. Slides destined for ICC are first fixed in formalin for 30 minutes to 60 minutes followed by antigen retrieval and immunostaining. Formalin fixation of smears approximates the formalin fixation conditions for the processing of cell blocks, biopsies, and resection specimens. In this regard, we use a combination of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections and/or unstained, formalin-fixed direct smears for positive controls. In our experience, unstained direct smears in high quantities can be prepared using centrifuged cellular material from effusion specimens and these can be used for positive control ICC reactions.32 We acknowledge that the use of unstained smears for ICC-positive controls is preferable within this context. Negative control immunostains are performed on unstained direct smears, for a given case, by omitting the primary antibody during the ICC reaction.
In our laboratory, this methodology has been applied to several clinical scenarios, such as the subclassification of pulmonary adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma30; the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma25; and the confirmation of metastatic Merkel cell carcinomas,31 malignant effusions,32 and Hodgkin lymphomas. Specifically, we have successfully performed ICC for a finite number of antibodies (including TTF-1, napsin A, p63, S-100, HMB-45, MART-1, CK7, CK20, cluster of differentiation [CD] 56, synaptophysin, epithelial membrane antigen, MOC-31, CDX-2, PAX8, calretinin, CD15, and CD30) on unstained direct smears using the Ventana Autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, Ariz). Background staining can represent a problematic issue that is associated with ICC performed on direct smears. Although we occasionally observe unacceptably high background staining in relation to the true signal, this is relatively uncommon. In our experience with the above markers, when mild background staining is observed, the signal-to-background staining ratio remains high.
Finally, cytologic smears are optimal for the performance of FISH because whole nuclei of tumor cells are being examined. Thus, direct smears can be used, in addition to cell blocks, for FISH studies.2
By considering that FNA is ideally suited for obtaining patient samples for diagnostic and molecular testing, and reviewing some of the more common tests as well as other sample collection methods, it is easy to appreciate the usefulness of routine FNA smears in providing optimal material for the storage and harvesting of the cellular material needed for such testing. Air-dried, Diff-Quik–stained smears for use in PCR-based tests are easy to prepare, require minimal processing and storage complexity, and are less cumbersome to microdissect than cell blocks. DNA extracted from direct smears is highly reliable and provides satisfactory molecular test results. Because smears can be directly observed at the time of the FNA procedure, the pathologist can ensure that adequate material has been obtained for cytodiagnosis and necessary ancillary tests. Routine cytologic smears, when incorporated into the triage and workflow for performing ancillary molecular tests, represent a cost-effective and powerful tool to aid in effective molecular testing in the age of personalized medicine.
No specific funding was disclosed.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES
The authors made no disclosures.
- 1Seize the opportunity: underutilization of fine-needle aspiration biopsy to inform targeted cancer therapy decisions. Cancer. 2009; 117: 289-297..
- 6The utility of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of the translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32) in the diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma on fine-needle aspiration specimens. Cancer. 2005; 105: 110-118., , , , , .
- 9The application of cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization to fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and subclassification of renal neoplasms. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2010; 118: 137-145., , , .
- 17Contribution of molecular testing to thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology of “follicular lesion of undetermined significance/atypia of undetermined significance.” Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2010; 118: 17-23., , , et al.
- 27Detection of EGFR and KRAS mutations in fine-needle aspirates stored on Whatman FTA cards: is this the tool for biobanking cytological samples in the molecular era? Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2010; 118: 450-456., , , , , .
- 30The application and diagnostic utility of immunocytochemistry on direct smears in the diagnosis of pulmonary adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma [published online ahead of print April 15, 2011]. Diagn Cytopathol. doi: 10.1002/dc.21680., , , et al.
- 31The application of immunocytochemistry to cytologic direct smears of metastatic merkel cell carcinoma [published online ahead of print December 5, 2011]. Diagn Cytopathol. doi: 10.1002/dc.22807., , , , .
- 32The application of immunocytochemistry to direct smears in the diagnosis of effusions [published online ahead of print April 30, 2012]. Diagn Cytopathol. doi: 10.1002/dc.22852., , , , .
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.