Get access

Architectonic analysis of the auditory-related areas of the superior temporal region in human brain

Authors

  • Barbara C. Fullerton,

    Corresponding author
    1. Eaton-Peabody Laboratory of Auditory Physiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
    2. Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
    3. Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial VA Medical Center, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
    • Eaton-Peabody Laboratory of Auditory Physiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles St., Boston, MA 02114
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Deepak N. Pandya

    1. Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial VA Medical Center, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
    2. Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology and Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118
    3. Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
    Search for more papers by this author

  • This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.

Abstract

Architecture of auditory areas of the superior temporal region (STR) in the human was analyzed in Nissl-stained material to see whether auditory cortex is organized according to principles that have been described in the rhesus monkey. Based on shared architectonic features, the auditory cortex in human and monkey is organized into three lines: areas in the cortex of the circular sulcus (root), areas on the supratemporal plane (core), and areas on the superior temporal gyrus (belt). The cytoarchitecture of the auditory area changes in a stepwise manner toward the koniocortical area, both from the direction of the temporal polar proisocortex as well as from the caudal temporal cortex. This architectonic dichotomy is consistent with differences in cortical and subcortical connections of STR and may be related to different functions of the rostral and caudal temporal cortices. There are some differences between rhesus monkey and human auditory anatomy. For instance, the koniocortex, root area PaI, and belt area PaA show further differentiation into subareas in the human brain. The relative volume of the core area is larger than that of the belt area in the human, but the reverse is true in the monkey. The functional significance of these differences across species is not known but may relate to speech and language functions. J. Comp. Neurol. 504:470–498, 2007. Published 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary