A collagen-based nerve guide conduit for peripheral nerve repair: An electrophysiological study of nerve regeneration in rodents and nonhuman primates

Authors

  • Simon J. Archibald,

    1. Departments of Surgery and Neurobiology, Division of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, and Research Service, Veterans Administration Hospital, Durham, North Carolina 27710
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Dr. Christian Krarup,

    1. Neurophysiology Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
    Current affiliation:
    1. Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology NF 3063-4, University Hospital, 9 Blegdamsvej, DK-2100 Copenhagen 0, Denmark
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jeremy Shefner,

    1. Neurophysiology Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Shu-Tung Li,

    1. Colla-Tec, Inc., Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Roger D. Madison

    1. Departments of Surgery and Neurobiology, Division of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, and Research Service, Veterans Administration Hospital, Durham, North Carolina 27710
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

When a peripheral nerve is severed and left untreated, the most likely result is the formation of an endbulb neuroma; this tangled mass of disorganized nerve fibers blocks functional recovery following nerve injury. Although there are several different approaches for promoting nerve repair, which have been greatly refined over recent years, the clinical results of peripheral nerve repair remain very disappointing. In this paper we compare the results of a collagen nerve guide conduit to the more standard clinical procedure of nerve autografting to promote repair of transected peripheral nerves in rats and nonhuman primates.

In rats, we tested recovery from sciatic nerve transection and repair by (1) direct microsurgical suture, (2) 4 mm autograft, or (3) entubulation repair with collagen-based nerve guide conduits. Evoked muscle action potentials (MAP), were recorded from the gastrocnemius muscle at 4 and 12 weeks following sciatic nerve transection. At 4 weeks the repair group of direct suture demonstrated a significantly greater MAP, compared to the other surgical repair groups. However, at 12 weeks all four surgical repair groups displayed similar levels of recovery of the motor response.

In six adult male Macaca fascicularis monkeys the median nerve was transected 2 cm above the wrist and repaired by either a 4 mm nerve autograft or a collagen-based nerve guide conduit leaving a 4 mm gap between nerve ends. Serial studies of motor and sensory fibers were performed by recording the evoked MAP from the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB) and the sensory action potential (SAP) evoked by stimulation of digital nerves (digit II), respectively, up to 760 days following surgery. Evoked muscle responses returned to normal baseline levels in all cases. Statistical analysis of the motor responses, as judged by the slope of the recovery curves, indicated a significantly more rapid rate of recovery for the nerve guide repair group. The final level of recovery of the MAP amplitudes was not significantly different between the groups. In contrast, the SAP amplitude only recovered to the low normal range and there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of sensory recovery rates.

The rodent and primate studies suggest that in terms of recovery of physiological responses from target muscle and sensory nerves, entubulation repair of peripheral nerves with a collagen-based nerve guide conduit over a short nerve gap (4 mm) is as effective as a standard nerve autograft. Furthermore, preliminary results show that entubulation repair with this material can support axon regeneration and maturation over a nerve gap distance of at least 15 mm.

Ancillary