SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Lintott CJ, Schawinski K, Slosar A, Land K, Bamford S, Thomas D, Raddick MJ, Nichol RC, Szalay A, Andreescu D, Murray P, van den Berg J. Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2008; 389(3):11791189.
  • 2
    Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Phillips T, Bonney R. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. City, 2007.
  • 3
    M. E. S. S. A. G. E. Project Overview. Mobile Environmental Sensing System Across Grid Environments (MESSAGE): City, 2010. http://bioinf.ncl.ac.uk/message/?q=node/5 [Accessed on 28 August 2012].
  • 4
    Foster-Smith J, Evans SM. The value of marine ecological data collected by volunteers. Biological Conservation 2003; 113(2):199213.
  • 5
    Paulos E. Designing for doubt citizen science and the challenge of change. Proceedings of the Engaging Data: First International Forum on the Application and Management of Personal Electronic Information, MIT, 2009.
  • 6
    Silvertown J. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2009; 24(9):28322842.
  • 7
    Galloway AWE, Tudor MT, Haegen WMV. The reliability of citizen science: a case study of Oregon White Oak Stand Surveys. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2006; 34(5):14251429.
  • 8
    Delaney DG, Sperling CD, Adams CS, Leung B. Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biological Invasions 2007; 10(1):117128.
  • 9
    Golbeck J. Trust and nuanced profile similarity in online social networks. ACM Transactions on the Web 2009; 3(4):133.
  • 10
    Massa P, Souren K, Salvetti M, Tomasoni D. Trustlet, open research on trust metrics. Scientific International Journal for Parallel and Distributed Computing 2008; 9(4):341351.
  • 11
    Advogato.org. Advogato's Trust Metric. Advogato.org: City, 2010. http://www.advogato.org/trust-metric.html. [Accessed on 28 August 2012].
  • 12
    Reid C, Marshall J, Logan D, Kleine D. Coral Reefs and Climate Change: The Guide for Education and Awareness. CoralWatch: Brisbane, 2009.
  • 13
    CoralWatch. Coral Health Chart. http://www.coralwatch.org/web/guest/coral-health-chart [Accessed on 26 August 2012].
  • 14
    Wand Y, Wang RY. Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Communications of the ACM 1996; 39(11):8695.
  • 15
    Huang K-T, Lee YW, Wang RY. Quality Information and Knowledge. Prentice Hall PTR, 1999.
  • 16
    Lee YW, Pipino L, Strong DM, Wang RY. Process-embedded data integrity. Journal Database Management 2004; 15(1):87103.
  • 17
    Pipino LL, Lee YW, Wang RY. Data quality assessment. Communications of the ACM 2002; 45(4):211218.
  • 18
    The BioGeoMancer Project. Available at: http://biogeomancer.sourceforge.net/, 2010.
  • 19
    ReefCheck Australia. http://www.reefcheckaustralia.org/ [Accessed on 28 August 2012].
  • 20
    NOAA Satellite and Information Service, Coral Reef Watch. “Calculating thermal stress and predicting coral bleaching: a lesson in NOAA coral reef watch methodology”. Available at: http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/education/bilko_lesson.html. [Accessed on 28 August 2012].
  • 21
    AIMS data centre. Available at: http://data.aims.gov.au/metadataviewer/faces/search.xhtml [Accessed on 28 August 2012].
  • 22
    Sabater J, Sierra C. Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artificial Intelligence Review 2005; 24(1):3360.
  • 23
    PostGIS. What is PostGIS? PostGIS Website, http://postgis.refractions.net/, 2010. [Accessed on 28 August 2012].
  • 24
    Grzonkowski S, Kruk S. D-FOAF: Role-based Access Control Standard. DERI International: Galway, http://foafrealm.org/documentation/AccessControl/, 2007. [Accessed on 7 August 2012].
  • 25
    Rezel R, Liang S. SWE-FE: extending folksonomies to the sensor Web. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems (CTS 2010), Chicago, USA, 2010.