Utilising the method we reported in ChemPhysChem2011, 12, 757–760 in subsequent work led to the discovery of errors in some of the equations used and reported. This corrigendum corrects the affected equations, and reproduces key results (shown in Table 1 and Figure 1, which correspond to Table 1 and Figure 1 in ref. 1) using the corrected equations.
Equations (5) and (6) contain the same error in the denominator of the first term. … should read …, with n = 4 and 12, for Equations (5) and (6), respectively. Additionally, δ33 should be replaced with δ11 in Equation (4).
Re-evaluation of the experimental T1 data yielded two solutions for θ and associated Dx, Dy and D⟂ values. The second solution was deemed physically impossible as it produced values of Dx≈Dy to <3%.
|14.09 T||11.74 T||Di [rad2 s−1 (i =x, y, ⟂)|
||% error|||5.30||8.28|||% error|=1.98*|
|R1DD=1/T1DD [s−1]||τ2,CSA,exp.=172.63 ps**|
||% error|||3.89||0.133||ηCSA=1.026, δ11=80.22 ppm|
The corresponding author sincerely apologises for these oversights.