Si⋅⋅⋅H Interligand Interactions in Cobalt(V) and Iridium(V) Bis(silyl)bis(hydride) Complexes

Authors

  • Yevhen Horbatenko,

    1. Institut de Química Computacional i Catàlisi, Campus de Montilivi, Universitat de Girona, 17071 Girona, Catalonia (Spain), Fax: (+34) 972-418356
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Prof. Sergei F. Vyboishchikov

    Corresponding author
    1. Institut de Química Computacional i Catàlisi, Campus de Montilivi, Universitat de Girona, 17071 Girona, Catalonia (Spain), Fax: (+34) 972-418356
    • Institut de Química Computacional i Catàlisi, Campus de Montilivi, Universitat de Girona, 17071 Girona, Catalonia (Spain), Fax: (+34) 972-418356
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

A series of bis(silyl)bis(hydride) cobalt complexes [Cp*Co(H)2(SiR3)2] (Cp*=pentamethylcyclopentadienyl; SiR3=SiPh2H, SiMe3, SiH3, SiF3, SiCl3, SiBr3, Si(CF3)3; Co1Co7) as well as the analogous iridium complexes [Cp*Ir(H)2(SiR3)2] (SiR3=SiEt3, SiMe3, SiH3, SiF3, SiCl3, SiBr3, Si(CF3)3; Ir1Ir7) were studied to detect possible residual Si⋅⋅⋅H interactions. Tests of several density functionals by comparison with coupled-cluster results indicate that the TPSSh functional performs better than B3LYP, BP86, M06, M06L, and PBEPBE. Based on molecular structures, as well as Wiberg bond indices and J(Si,H) spin–spin coupling constants as indicators of a possible Si⋅⋅⋅H interaction, at least two residual Si⋅⋅⋅H interactions in Co2, Co5, and all four possible Si⋅⋅⋅H interactions in Co3 and Co4 have been detected. Co6 and Co7 exhibit stronger Si⋅⋅⋅H bonding than the other complexes studied. On the contrary, the iridium complexes Ir1Ir3 and Ir5Ir7 are classical iridium(V) bis(silyl)bis(hydride) complexes with only rudimentary Si⋅⋅⋅H interactions, if any.

Ancillary