Research Article
The evolutionary ecology of technological innovations
Article first published online: 8 FEB 2013
DOI: 10.1002/cplx.21436
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Solée, R. V., Valverde, S., Casals, M. R., Kauffman, S. A., Farmer, D. and Eldredge, N. (2013), The evolutionary ecology of technological innovations. Complexity, 18: 15–27. doi: 10.1002/cplx.21436
Publication History
- Issue published online: 13 MAR 2013
- Article first published online: 8 FEB 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 19 DEC 2012
- Manuscript Received: 21 NOV 2012
Funded by
- James McDonnell Foundation (RS). Grant Number: FIS2004-05422 (RS,SV)
- Marcelino Botin Foundation (SV, RS)
- TEKES Foundation of Finland (SK)
- National Science Foundation (NSF). Grant Number: SBE0738187 (DF)
- Santa Fe institute
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Technology;
- evolution;
- tinkering;
- convergence;
- information technology;
- culturomics
Abstract
Technological evolution has been compared to biological evolution by many authors over the last two centuries. As a parallel experiment of innovation involving economic, historical, and social components, artifacts define a universe of evolving properties that displays episodes of diversification and extinction. Here, we critically review previous work comparing the two types of evolution. Like biological evolution, technological evolution is driven by descent with variation and selection, and includes tinkering, convergence, and contingency. At the same time, there are essential differences that make the two types of evolution quite distinct. Major distinctions are illustrated by current specific examples, including the evolution of cornets and the historical dynamics of information technologies. Due to their fast and rich development, the later provide a unique opportunity to study technological evolution at all scales with unprecedented resolution. Despite the presence of patterns suggesting convergent trends between man-made systems end biological ones, they provide examples of planned design that have no equivalent with natural evolution.

1099-0526/asset/CPLX_centre.gif?v=1&s=03c1920ecd364809d0e2133a97430a010474ba88)
