Original Paper
X-ray, synchrotron, and neutron diffraction analysis of Roman cavalry parade helmet fragment
Article first published online: 21 SEP 2010
DOI: 10.1002/crat.201000419
Copyright © 2010 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Additional Information
How to Cite
Smrčok, L'., Petrík, I., Langer, V., Filinchuk, Y. and Beran, P. (2010), X-ray, synchrotron, and neutron diffraction analysis of Roman cavalry parade helmet fragment. Cryst. Res. Technol., 45: 1025–1031. doi: 10.1002/crat.201000419
Publication History
- Issue published online: 21 SEP 2010
- Article first published online: 21 SEP 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 31 AUG 2010
- Manuscript Revised: 20 AUG 2010
- Manuscript Received: 23 JUL 2010
Funded by
- Research Centre Řež. Grant Numbers: AV0Z10480505, MSM2672244501
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- archaeometry;
- Roman helmet;
- phase analysis;
- neutron diffraction;
- synchrotron diffraction;
- brass corrosion
Abstract
A partially corroded fragment of the neck guard of a Roman cavalry helmet excavated in the former military camp of Gerulata, a part of the Limes Romanus on the River Danube, was analysed by laboratory X-ray, synchrotron and neutron powder diffraction. The approximate phase composition determined by the neutron diffraction of the bulk, 82% (wt) of the copper alloy phase, 12 % (wt) of cuprite and 6% of nantokite indicate a significant degree of corrosion of the artefact. Elemental EDX analysis of cleaned surface showed that the chemical composition of the original alloy is 78 to 82 % (wt) of Cu and 21.4 to 16.5 % of Zn with minute amounts of Sn, Si and S. High contents of Cu and Zn with the negligible amount of Sn showed that the body of the helmet was made of brass and not of bronze as expected before. The amount of zinc in the copper alloy calculated from the refined lattice parameter agrees fairly well with the value determined by EDX. The most abundant phase in the synchrotron powder diffraction pattern of the corrosion products scrapped from the artefact is cuprite, but presence of atacamite, malachite, brochantite, nantokite, mixed Cu-Zn hydroxyl carbonates and probably also of simonkolleite (Zn5(OH)8Cl2·H2O) have been detected. In contrast, the X-ray pattern taken directly from the surface of the artefact is dominated by atacamite with some traces of malachite and quartz. Because the penetration depth of laboratory X-rays is in order of tens of microns, the phase analysis based only on a diffraction pattern taken from a surface can lead to erroneous conclusions concerning the phase composition of the patina. (© 2010 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

1521-4079/asset/2223_left.gif?v=1&s=ccf03f56cf6b72f3cc5be7715dbd0ad28428a0fb)
