This study was supported with funds from the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act trust fund by interagency agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, U.S. Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services.
Interlaboratory study of cellular fluorescence intensity measurements with fluorescein-labeled microbead standards†
Article first published online: 8 MAR 2005
Copyright © 1991 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Volume 12, Issue 6, pages 525–536, 1991
How to Cite
Vogt, R. F., Cross, G. D., Phillips, D. L., Henderson, L. O. and Hannon, W. H. (1991), Interlaboratory study of cellular fluorescence intensity measurements with fluorescein-labeled microbead standards. Cytometry, 12: 525–536. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990120609
- Issue published online: 21 JUN 2005
- Article first published online: 8 MAR 2005
- Manuscript Accepted: 24 MAR 1991
- Manuscript Received: 11 JUL 1989
- Flow cytometry;
- CD4 lymphocytes;
- quality control
To determine the precision of cellular fluorescence intensity (FI) measurements derived from labeled microbead standards, FI results were compared from 43 different flow cytometers in 34 laboratories. All laboratories analyzed prepared aliquots of fluoresceinated calf thymocyte nuclei (Fluorotrol), human lymphocytes stained with fluoresceinated anti-CD4 antibody, and fluoresceinated microbeads used as both internal and external standards. Measurements were conducted by most laboratories on the third and fourth days after sample preparation. Results for percent of events within the gates and the histograms returned by participants indicated that the samples had remained stable and that gated populations had been properly identified. All standard curves showed strong linearity, and the pooled results from all standards produced a best-fit curve that was in close agreement with the assigned values. Nonetheless, results for cellular FI were highly variable, with CVs of 20–34%. Agreement within lab/instrument was much better, with CVs ranging from 3.0 to 9.9%. The overall variability was not obviously attributable to differences in the types of cytometer, nor could it be explained by attributes of the standard curves or any other single variable examined. However, the application of a corrective factor based on FI results for Fluorotrol allowed a two-fold improvement in the precision of FI measurements on CD4-stained lymphocytes, with an overall CV of 11%. Uncharacterized differences in the operating conditions of flow cytometers can influence cellular FI measurements, but consistent results can be obtained if a stained cellular calibrator is analyzed in addition to the proper microbead standards.