The research described in this article has been reviewed and approved for publication as an EPA document. Approval does not necessarily signify that the contents reflect the views and policies of the Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
Calibration and validation of confocal spectral imaging systems†
Version of Record online: 5 OCT 2004
Copyright © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Cytometry Part A
Volume 62A, Issue 1, pages 8–34, November 2004
How to Cite
Lerner, J. M. and Zucker, R. M. (2004), Calibration and validation of confocal spectral imaging systems. Cytometry, 62A: 8–34. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20087
- Issue online: 21 OCT 2004
- Version of Record online: 5 OCT 2004
- Manuscript Revised: 26 JUL 2004
- Manuscript Accepted: 26 JUL 2004
- Manuscript Received: 13 APR 2004
- confocal microscope;
- wavelength calibration;
- spectral calibration;
- spectral imaging;
- quality assurance;
- photomultiplier tube
Confocal spectral imaging (CSI) microscopic systems currently on the market delineate multiple fluorescent proteins, labels, or dyes within biological specimens by performing spectral characterizations. However, some CSI systems have been found to present inconsistent spectral profiles of reference spectra within a particular system and between related and unrelated instruments. This variability confirms that there is a need for a standardized, objective calibration and validation protocol.
Our protocol uses an inexpensive multi-ion discharge lamp (MIDL) that contains Hg+, Ar+, and inorganic fluorophores that emit distinct, stable, spectral features in place of a sample. We derived reference spectra from the MIDL data to accurately predict the spectral resolution, ratio of wavelength to wavelength, contrast, and aliasing parameters of any CSI system. We were also able to predict and confirm the influence of pinhole diameter on spectral profiles.
Using this simulation, we determined that there was good agreement between observed and theoretical expectations, thus enabling us to identify malfunctioning subsystems. We examined eight CSI systems and one nonconfocal spectral system, all of which displayed spectral inconsistencies. No instrument met its optimal performance expectations. In two systems, we established the need for factory realignment that had not been otherwise recognized.
We found that using a primary light source that emits an absolute standard “reference spectrum” enabled us to diagnose instrumental errors and measure accuracy and reproducibility under normalized conditions. With this information, a CSI operator can determine whether a CSI system is working optimally and make objective comparisons with the performance of other CSI systems. We determined that, if CSI systems were standardized to produce the same spectral profile of a MIDL lamp, researchers could be confident that the same experimental findings would be obtained on any CSI system. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.