SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • 1
    Trefethen LN. Maxims about numerical mathematics, computers and life. SIAM News 1998; 31(1).
  • 2
    Zucker RM, Price OT. Practical confocal microscopy and the evaluation of system performance. Methods 1999; 18: 447458.
  • 3
    Centonze V, Pawley J. Tutorial on practical confocal microscopy and use of the confocal test specimen. In: PawleyJ, editor. Handbook of biological confocal microscopy. New York: Plenum Press; 1995. p 559567.
  • 4
    Centonze V, Pawley J. Practical laser scanning confocal light microscopy: obtaining optimum performance from your instrument. In: CelisJ, editor. Cell biology. New York: Academic Press; 1998. p 149169.
  • 5
    Carter D. Practical consideration for collecting confocal images. In: PaddockS, editor. Confocal microscopy methods and protocols. Methods in molecular biology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1999. p 3557.
  • 6
    Zucker RM, Price OT. Evaluation of confocal microscopy system performance. Cytometry 2001; 44: 273294.
  • 7
    Dickinson ME, Bearman G, Tille S, Lansford R, Fraser SE. Multi-spectral imaging and linear unmixing add a whole new dimension to laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Biotechniques 2001; 31: 12721278.
  • 8
    National Institute of Standards and Technology. Atomic spectra database: lines data; 2000.
  • 9
    Lerner JM, Drake L. Practical characteristics of spectral imaging methods. Am Biotechnol Lab 2002; 20: 3640.
  • 10
    Multi-anode photomultiplier tube assemblies H7260 and H7260A. Tokyo: Hamamatsu Corporation; 2000.
  • 11
    Shapiro H. Practical flow cytometry. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1995. p 106135.
  • 12
    Tsien RY, Waggoner A. Fluorophores for confocal microscopy. In: PawleyJ, editor. Handbook of biological confocal microscopy. New York: Plenum Press; 1995. p 127137.
  • 13
    Proakis J, Manolakis D. Digital signal processing: principles, algorithms, and applications. New York: Prentice-Hall; 1996.
  • 14
    Castleman KR. Resolution and sampling requirements for digital image processing, analysis, and display. In: ShottonDM, editor. Electronic light microscopy. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1993. p 7193.
  • 15
    Keshava N. A survey of spectral unmixing algorithms. Lincoln Lab J 2003; 14: 5573.
  • 16
    Garini Y, Katzir N, Cabib D, Buckwald RA, Soenksen DG, Malik Z. Spectral bio-imaging. In: WangXF, HermanB, editors. Fluorescence imaging spectroscopy and microscopy. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1996. p 87124.
  • 17
    Flamand J, Labeyrie A, Pieuchard G. Diffraction gratings. US patent no. 3,628,849; 1971.
  • 18
    Pieuchard G, Flamand J, Passereau G. Monochromator with concave grating. US patent no. 3,930,728; 1976.
  • 19
    Benedetti PA, Evangelista V, Guidarini D, Vestri S. Confocal-line microscopy. J Microsc 1992; 165: 119129.
  • 20
    Loewen EG, Popov E. Instrumental systems. In: Diffraction gratings and applications. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997. p 437480.
  • 21
    Loewen EG, Popov E. Diffraction gratings and applications. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997.
  • 22
    Hutley MC. Diffraction gratings. London: Academic Press; 1982.
  • 23
    James JF, Sternberg RS. The design of optical spectrometers. London: Chapman and Hall; 1969.
  • 24
    Lerner JM, Thevenon A. The optics of spectroscopy: a tutorial. Metuchen, NJ: Jobin Yvon/JY Optical Systems; 1998.
  • 25
    RobinsonJP, managing editor. Current protocols in cytometry. In: Current protocols in cytometry. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
  • 26
    Zucker RM, Elstein KH, Gershey EL, Massaro EJ. Increased sensitivity of the Ortho analytical Cytoflurograph by modifying the fluidic system. Cytometry 1990; 11: 848851.
  • 27
    Kim SM. Review on recent development of quantum dots: from optoelectronic devices to novel bio-sensing applications. In: RazeghiM, BrownGJ, editors. Quantum sensing: evolution and revolution from past to future. San Jose, CA: International Society for Optical Engineering; 2003. Vol. 4999 p 4234330.
  • 28
    Lim YT, Kim S, Nakayama A, Stott NE, Bawendi MG, Frangioni JV. Selection of quantum dot wavelengths for biomedical assays and imaging. Mol Imaging 2003; 2: 5064.
  • 29
    Wilson T. The role of the pinhole in confocal imaging systems. In: PawleyJ, editor. Handbook of biological confocal microscopy. New York: Plenum Press; 1995. p 167182.
  • 30
    Cogswell CJ, Larkin KG. The specimen illumination path and its effect on image quality. In: PawleyJ, editor. Handbook of biological confocal microscopy. New York: Plenum Press; 1995. p 127137.
  • 31
    Sheppard CJR, Shotton DM. Confocal laser scanning microscopy. Abingdon, UK: Bios Scientific Publishing; 1997.
  • 32
    Pawley J. Fundamental limits in confocal microscopy. In: PawleyJ, editor. Handbook of biological confocal microscopy. New York: Plenum Press; 1995. p 1936.