• 1
    Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 1983; 220: 10491051.
  • 2
    Galbraith DW. Analysis of higher plants by flow cytometry and cell sorting. Int Rev Cytol 1989; 116: 5228.
  • 3
    Arumuganathan K, Earle ED. Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1991; 9: 208218.
  • 4
    Marie D, Brown SC. A cytometric exercise in plant DNA histograms, with 2C values for 70 species. Biol Cell 1993; 78: 4151.
  • 5
    Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Ann Bot 1995; 76: 113176.
  • 6
    Dolezel J, Greilhuber J, Lucretti S, Meister A, Lysak MA, Nardi L, Obermayer R. Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry:inter-laboratory comparison. Ann Bot 1998; 82: 1726.
  • 7
    Johnston JS, Bennett MD, Rayburn AL, Galbraith DW, Price HJ. Reference standards for determination of DNA content of plant nuclei. Am J Bot 1999; 86: 609613.
  • 8
    Galbraith DW. Flow cytometric analysis of plant genomes. Methods Cell Biol 1990; 33: 549562.
  • 9
    Galbraith DW, Lambert GM, Macas J, Dolezel J. Analysis of nuclear DNA content and ploidy in higher plants. Analysis of nuclear DNA content and ploidy in higher plants. In: RobinsonJP, DarzynkiewiczZ, DeanPN, DresslerLG, OrfaoA, RabinovitchPS, StewartCC, TankeHJ, WheelessLL, editors. Current protocols in cytometry. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1998. p
  • 10
    Greilhuber J. “Self-tanning”—a new and important source of stoichiometric error in cytophotometric determination of nuclear DNA content in plants. Plant Syst Evol 1988; 158: 8796.
  • 11
    Greilhuber J. Intraspecific variation in genome size: a critical reassessment. Ann Bot 1998; 82: 2735.
  • 12
    Price HJ, Hodnett G, Johnston JS. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) leaves contain compounds that reduce nuclear propidium iodide fluorescence. Ann Bot 2000; 86: 929934.
  • 13
    Noirot M, Barre P, Louran J, Dupperay Ch, Hamon S. Nucleus-cytosol interactions—a source of stoichiometric error in flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants. Ann Bot 2000; 86: 309316.
  • 14
    Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Knapp S. Systemic endopolyploidy in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 1991; 96: 985989.
  • 15
    Bharathan G, Lambert G, Galbraith DW. Nuclear DNA content of monocotyledons and related taxa. Am J Bot 1994; 81: 381386.
  • 16
    Akinerdem F. Determination of the ploidy level of pure and mixed plant populations of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) by flow cytometry. Plant Breed 1991; 107: 333337.
  • 17
    Matzk F, Meister A, Schubert I. An efficient screen for reproductive pathways using mature seeds of monocots and dicots. Plant J 2000; 21: 97108.
  • 18
    Bino RJ, de Vries JN, Kraak HL, van Pijlen JG. Flow cytometric determination of nuclear replication stages in tomato seeds during priming and germination. Ann Bot 1992; 69: 231236.
  • 19
    Bino RJ, Lanteri S, Verhoeven HA, Kraak HL. Flow cytometric determination of nuclear replication stages in seed tissues. Ann Bot 1993; 72: 181187.
  • 20
    Sliwinska E. Flow cytometric analysis of sugar beet seeds different in vigour. In: EllisRH, BlackM, HongTD, editors. Basic and applied aspects of seed biology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1997. p 577584.
  • 21
    Sliwinska E. Analysis of the cell cycle in sugarbeet seed during development, maturation and germination. In: BlackM, BradfordKJ, Vazquez-RamosJ, editors. Seed biology: advances and applications. Wallingford: CAB International; 2000. p 133139.
  • 22
    Sliwinska E. Cell cycle and germination of fresh, dried and deteriorated sugar-beet seeds as indicators of optimal harvest time. Seed Sci Res 2003; 13: 131138.
  • 23
    Sliwinska E, Jendrzejczak E. Sugar-beet seed quality and DNA synthesis in the embryo in relation to hydration-dehydration cycles. Seed Sci Technol 2002; 30: 597608.
  • 24
    Dilkes BP, Dante RA, Coelho C, Larkins BA. Genetic analyses of endoreduplication in Zea mays endosperm: evidence of sporophytic and zygotic maternal control. Genetics 2002; 160: 11631177.
  • 25
    Baranyi M, Greilhuber J. Flow cytometric and Feulgen densitometric analysis of genome size variation in Pisum. Theor Appl Genet 1996; 92: 297307.
  • 26
    Tiersch TR, Chandler RW, Wachtel SSM, Ellias S. Reference standards for flow cytometry and application in comparative studies of nuclear DNA content. Cytometry 1989; 10: 706710.
  • 27
    Dolezel J, Binarova P, Lucretti S. Analysis of nuclear DNA content in plant cells by flow cytometry. Biol Plant 1989; 31: 113120.
  • 28
    Lysak MA, Dolezel J. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in Sesleria (Poaceae). Caryologia 1998; 52: 123132.
  • 29
    Olszewska MJ, Osiecka R. The relationship between 2C DNA content, life-cycle type, systematic position and the dynamics of DNA endoreplication in parenchyma nuclei during growth and differentiation of roots in some dicotyledonous-herbaceous species. Biochem Physiol Pflanz 1983; 178: 581599.
  • 30
    Bennett MD, Smith JB, Heslop-Harrison JS. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Proc R Soc Lond B 1982; 216: 179199.
  • 31
    Naczk M, Amarowicz R, Sullivan A, Shahidi F. Current research developments on polyphenolics of rapeseed/canola: a review. Food Chem 1998; 62: 489502.
  • 32
    O'Brien IEW, Smith DR, Gardner RC, Murray BG. Flow cytometric determination of genome size in Pinus. Plant Sci 1996; 115: 9199.
  • 33
    Zoldos V, Papes D, Brown SC, Panaud O, Siljak-Yakovlev S. Genome size on base composition of seven Quercus species: inter- and intra-population variation. Genome 1998; 41: 162168.
  • 34
    Thiem B, Sliwinska E. Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus L.) in vitro cultures. Plant Sci 2003; 164: 129134.