• 1
    Zucker RM, Price OT. Evaluation of confocal system performance. Cytometry 2001; 44: 273294.
  • 2
    Zucker RM. Evaluation of confocal microscopy system performance. In: DouglasTaajets, editor. Cell Imaging Techniques. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2005. Chapter 5, pp 77135.
  • 3
    Zucker RM, Price OT. Statistical evaluation of confocal microscopy images. Cytometry 2001; 44: 295308.
  • 4
    Zucker RM, Price OT. Practical confocal microscopy and the evaluation of system performance. Methods 1999; 18: 447458.
  • 5
    Lerner JL, Zucker RM. Calibration and validation of spectroscopic imaging. Cytometry A 2004; 62: 834.
  • 6
    Zucker RM, Lerner JL. Wavelength and alignment tests for confocal imaging systems. Microsc Res Tech 2005; 68: 307319.
  • 7
    Zucker RM. Instability in confocal microscopy slide based systems: Laser power, galvanometer, spectroscopy. Cytometry 2006.
  • 8
    Centonze V, Pawley J. Tutorial on practical confocal microscopy and use of the confocal test specimen. In: PawleyJ, editor. Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, 2nd ed. New York: Plenum; 1995. pp 559567.
  • 9
    Centonze V, Pawley J. Practical laser scanning confocal light microscopy: Obtaining optimum performance from your instrument. In: CelisJ, editor. Cell Biology, 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press; 1998. Vol 3, pp 149169.
  • 10
    Sheppard CJR, Shotton DM. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. New York: Bios Scientific Publishing; 1997.
  • 11
    Marjlof L, Forsgren PO. Accurate imaging in confocal microscopy. In: MatsumatoB, editor. Methods of Cell Biology. San Diego: Academic Press; 1993. pp 7995.
  • 12
    Carter D. Practical considerations for collecting confocal images. Methods Mol Biol 1999; 122: 3557. Carter D. Confocal Microscopy Methods and Protocols. In: PaddockS, editor. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
  • 13
    Pawley J. Fundamental limits in confocal Microscopy. In: PawleyJ, editor. Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, 2nd ed. New York: Plenum; 1995. Chapter 2, pp 1936.
  • 14
    Pawley J. The 39 steps: A cautionary tale of quantitative 3-D fluorescence microscopy. Biotechniques 2000; 28: 884886.
  • 15
    Cogswell CJ, Larkin KG. The specimen illumination path and its effect on image quality. In: PawleyJ, editor. Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, 2nd ed. New York: Plenum; 1995. Chapter 8, pp 127137.
  • 16
    Czader M, Liljeborg A, Auer G, Porwit A. Confocal 3-dimensional DNA image cytometry in thick tissue sections. Cytometry 1996; 25: 246253.
  • 17
    Ecker RC, Tarnok A. Cytomics goes 3D: Toward tissomics. Cytometry A 2005; 65: 13.
  • 18
    Mittag A, Lenz D, Gerstner AO, Sack U, Steinbrecher M, Koksch M, Raffael A, Bocsi J, Tarnok A. Polychromatic (eight-color) slide-based cytometry for the phenotyping of leukocyte, NK, and NKT subsets. Cytometry A 2005; 65: 103115.
  • 19
    Tarnok A, Gerstner AO. Clinical applications of laser scanning cytometry. Cytometry 2002; 50: 133143.
  • 20
    Tarnok A. New technologies for the human cytome project. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2004; 18: 9295.
  • 21
    Shapiro H. Practical Flow Cytometry, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley Liss; 1995.
  • 22
    Waxdal MJ, Monical MC, Palini AG. Inter-laboratory relative fluorescence intensity measurements using FlowCal 575 calibration beads: A baseline study. Cytometry 1998; 33: 213218.
  • 23
    Gratama JW, D'hautcourt JL, Mandy F, Rothe G, Barnett D, Janossy G, Papa S, Schmitz G, Lenkei R. Flow cytometric quantitation of immunofluorescence intensity: Problems and perspectives. Eur Working Group Clin Cell Anal 1998; 33: 166178.
  • 24
    Serke S, van Lessen A, Huhn D. Quantitative fluorescence flow cytometry: A comparison of the three techniques for direct and indirect immunofluorescence. Cytometry 1998; 33: 179187.
  • 25
    Wallace W, Schaefer LH, Swedlow JR. A workingperson's guide to deconvolution in light microscopy. Biotechniques 2001; 31: 10761082.
  • 26
    Swedlow JR, Hu K, Andrews PD, Roos DS, Murray JM. Measuring tubulin content in Toxoplasma gondii: A comparison of laser-scanning confocal and wide-field fluorescence microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 20142019.
  • 27
    White NS, Errington RJ, Fricker MD, Wood JL. Aberration control in quantitative imaging of botanical specimens by multi dimensional fluorescence microscopy. J Microsc 1996; 181: 99116.
  • 28
    Art J. Photon detectors for confocal microscopy. In: PawleyJ, editor. Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, 2nd ed. New York: Plenum; 1995. Chapter 12, pp 3195.
  • 29
    Pawley JB. Sources of Noise in Three Dimensional Microscope DataSets in Three Dimensional Confocal Microscopy: Volume Investigations of Biological Specimens. New York: Academic Press; 1994.
  • 30
    Robinson JP. Current Protocols in Cytometry Basis of Digital Microscopy Section. New York: Wiley Liss; 2005. p 12.2.4.
  • 31
    Russ JC. Image Processing Handbook, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1998.
  • 32
    Piston DW. Choosing objective lenses: The importance of numerical aperture and magnification in digital optical microscopy. Biol Bull 1998; 195: 14.