Original Article

You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article

Mixture-model classification in DNA content analysis

  1. Huixia Wang1,
  2. Shuguang Huang2,*

Article first published online: 25 JUL 2007

DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20443

Issue

Cytometry Part A

Cytometry Part A

Volume 71A, Issue 9, pages 716–723, September 2007

Additional Information

How to Cite

Wang, H. and Huang, S. (2007), Mixture-model classification in DNA content analysis. Cytometry, 71A: 716–723. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20443

Author Information

  1. 1

    Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695

  2. 2

    Genomics and Molecular Informatics, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285

*Genomics and Molecular Informatics, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 17 AUG 2007
  2. Article first published online: 25 JUL 2007
  3. Manuscript Accepted: 19 JUN 2007
  4. Manuscript Revised: 11 JUN 2007
  5. Manuscript Received: 13 APR 2007

Funded by

  • National Science Foundation. Grant Number: DMS-0706963

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (347K)

LITERATURE CITED

  • 1
    Omerod MG. Analysis of DNA-general methods. In: OmerodMG, editor. Flow Cytometry, A Practical Approach,2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994.Chapter 7.
  • 2
    Gasparri F,Cappella P,Galvani A. Multiparametric cell cycle analysis by automated microscopy. J Biomol Screen 2006; 11: 586–598.
  • 3
    Mann RC,Hand REJr,Braslawsky GR. Parametric analysis of histograms measured in flow cytometry. Cytometry 1983; 4: 75–82.
    Direct Link:
  • 4
    Baldetorp B,Dalberg M,Holst U,Lindgren G. Statistical evaluation of cell kinetic datafrom DNA flow cytometry (FCM) by the EM algorithm. Cytometry 1989; 10: 695–705.
    Direct Link:
  • 5
    Vindelov LL,Christensen IJ. A review of techniques and results obtained in one laboratory by an integrated system of methods designed for routing clinical flow cytometric DNA analysis. Cytometry 1990; 11: 753–770.
    Direct Link:
  • 6
    Diaz-Frances E,Sprott DA. Statistical analysis of nuclear genome size of plants with flow cytometer data. Cytometry 2001; 45: 244–249.
    Direct Link:
  • 7
    Eudey TL. Statistical considerations in DNA flow cytometry. Stat Sci 1996; 11: 320–334.
  • 8
    Watson JV. Proof without prejudice revisited: Immunofluorescence histogram analysis using cumulative frequency subtraction plus ratio analysis of means. Cytometry 2001; 43: 55–68.
    Direct Link:
  • 9
    Bagwell CB. A journey through flow cytometric immunofluorescence analyses-finding accurate and robust algorithms that estimate positive fraction distribution. Clin Immunol Newsletter 1996; 16: 33–37.
  • 10
    Dempster A,Laird N,Rubin D. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc B, 1977; 39: 1–38.
  • 11
    McLachlan GJ,Basford KE. Mixture Models: Inference and Applications to Clustering. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1988. 119 pp.
  • 12
    Gibbons JD. Nonparametric Methods for Quantitative Analysis, 3rd ed. Columbus, Ohio: American Sciences Press; 1997.
  • 13
    Conover WJ. Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1999.
  • 14
    Young IT. Proof without prejudice: Use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for the analysis of histograms from flow systems and other sources. J Histochem Cytochem 1977; 25: 935–941.
  • 15
    Lampariello F. On the use Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test for immunofluorescence histogram comparison. Cytometry 2000; 39: 179–188.
    Direct Link:
  • 16
    Grove LE,Ghosh RN. Quantitative characterization of mitosis-blocked tetraploid cells using high content analysis. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2006; 4: 421–442.
  • 17
    Cellomics. Cellomics HCS Reader: Target Activation BioApplication Guide (V2 version). http://www.cellomics.com.
View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (347K)