SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • 1
    Schukken YH,Wilson DJ,Welcome F,Garrison-Tikofsky L,Gonzalez RN. Monitoring udder health and milk quality using somatic cell counts. Veterinary Res 2003; 34: 579596.
  • 2
    Auldist MJ,Hubble IB. Effects of mastitis on raw milk and dairy products. Aust J Dairy Technol 1998; 53: 2836.
  • 3
    Ma Y,Ryan C,Barbano DM,Galton DM,Rudan MA,Boor KJ. Effects of somatic cell count on quality and shelf-life of pasteurized fluid milk. J Dairy Sci 2000; 83: 264274.
  • 4
    Viguier C,Arora S,Gilmartin N,Welbeck K,O'Kennedy R. Mastitis detection: Current trends and future perspectives. Trends Biotechnol 2009; 27: 486493.
  • 5
    Miller RH,Paape MJ,Acton JC. Comparison of milk somatic-cell counts by coulter and fossomatic counters. J Dairy Sci 1986; 69: 19421946.
  • 6
    Gonzalo C,Linage B,Carriedo JA,De la Fuente F,San Primitivo F. Evaluation of the overall accuracy of the DeLaval cell counter for somatic cell counts in ovine milk. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 46134619.
  • 7
    Redelman D,Butler S,Robison J,Garner D. Identification of inflammatory cells in bovine milk by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1988; 9: 463468.
  • 8
    Moon JS,Koo HC,Joo YS,Jeon SH,Hur DS,Chung CI,Jo HS,Park YH. Application of a new portable microscopic somatic cell counter with disposable plastic chip for milk analysis. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 22532259.
  • 9
    Dosogne H,Vangroenweghe F,Mehrzad J,Massart-Leen AM,Burvenich C. Differential leukocyte count method for bovine low somatic cell count milk. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86: 828834.
  • 10
    Dulin AM,Paape MJ,Weinland BT. Cytospin centrifuge in differential differential counts of milk somatic-cells. J Dairy Sci 1982; 65: 12471251.
  • 11
    Grenvall C,Augustsson P,Folkenberg JR,Laurell T. Harmonic microchip acoustophoresis: A route to online raw milk sample precondition in protein and lipid content quality control. Anal Chem 2009; 81: 61956200.
  • 12
    Petersson F,Nilsson A,Holm C,Jonsson H,Laurell T. Continuous separation of lipid particles from erythrocytes by means of laminar flow and acoustic standing wave forces. Lab Chip 2005; 5: 2022.
  • 13
    Nilsson A,Petersson F,Jonsson H,Laurell T. Acoustic control of suspended particles in micro fluidic chips. Lab Chip 2004; 4: 131135.
  • 14
    Barnkob R,Augustsson P,Laurell T,Bruus H. Measuring the local pressure amplitude in microchannel acoustophoresis. Lab Chip 2010; 10: 563570.
  • 15
    Hawkes JJ,Coakley WT. Force field particle filter, combining ultrasound standing waves and laminar flow. Sens Actuat B Chem 2001; 75: 213222.
  • 16
    Hultstrom J,Manneberg O,Dopf K,Hertz HM,Brismar H,Wiklund M. Proliferation and viability of adherent cells manipulated by standing-wave ultrasound in a microfluidic chip. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007; 33: 145151.
  • 17
    Dykes J,Lenshof A,Astrand-Grundstrom IB,Laurell T,Scheding S. Efficient removal of platelets from peripheral blood progenitor cell products using a novel micro-chip based acoustophoretic platform. Plos One 2011; 6:e23074.
  • 18
    Gawad S,Schild L,Renaud P. Micromachined impedance spectroscopy flow cytometer for cell analysis and particle sizing. Lab Chip 2001; 1: 7682.
  • 19
    Bao N,Wang J,Lu C. Recent advances in electric analysis of cells in microfluidic systems. Anal Bioanal Chem 2008; 391: 933942.
  • 20
    Sun T,Morgan H. Single-cell microfluidic impedance cytometry: A review. Microfluidics Nanofluidics 2010; 8: 423443.
  • 21
    Holmes D,Pettigrew D,Reccius CH,Gwyer JD,van Berkel C,Holloway J,Davies DE,Morgan H. Leukocyte analysis and differentiation using high speed microfluidic single cell impedance cytometry. Lab Chip 2009; 9: 28812889.