Get access

THE IMPACT OF DISSOCIATION ON PTSD TREATMENT WITH COGNITIVE PROCESSING THERAPY

Authors

  • Patricia A. Resick,

    Corresponding author
    1. Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
    • National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Boston Healthcare System Boston, Massachusetts
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Michael K. Suvak,

    1. National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Boston Healthcare System Boston, Massachusetts
    2. Suffolk University, Boston, Massachusetts
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Benjamin D. Johnides,

    1. National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Boston Healthcare System Boston, Massachusetts
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Karen S. Mitchell,

    1. National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Boston Healthcare System Boston, Massachusetts
    2. Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Katherine M. Iverson

    1. National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Boston Healthcare System Boston, Massachusetts
    2. Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Contract grant sponsor: NIMH; Contract grant number: 2-R01-MH51509 to PAS.

Correspondence to: Patricia A. Resick, WHSD (116B-3), VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Street, Boston, MA 02130.

E-mail: Patricia.Resick@va.gov

Abstract

Background

This secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) and its constituent components investigated whether dissociation decreased over the course of treatment primarily targeting symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and explored whether levels of dissociation predicted treatment outcome differentially by treatment condition.

Methods

An intention to treat sample of 150 women were randomized to CPT, cognitive therapy only (CPT-C) or written trauma accounts only (WA). Dissociation was measured by the dissociation subscale of the Traumatic Stress Inventory and the Multiscale Dissociation Inventory.

Results

Multilevel regression analyses revealed significant decreases in dissociation that did not vary as a function of treatment condition. Growth curve modeling revealed significant treatment condition by dissociation interactions such that the impact of pretreatment levels of dissociation impacted the treatment conditions differently.

Conclusions

Women who endorsed low pretreatment levels of dissociation responded most efficiently to CPT-C, whereas women with the highest levels of dissociation, in particular high levels of depersonalization, responded better to CPT.

Ancillary