Ph.: +801-581-2507; Fax: +801-581-7035
Symposium Issue
Respiratory cytology in the era of molecular diagnostics: A review
Article first published online: 22 MAY 2012
DOI: 10.1002/dc.22858
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Issue

Diagnostic Cytopathology
Special Issue: Symposium Issue
Volume 40, Issue 6, pages 556–563, June 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
Witt, B. L., Wallander, M. L., Layfield, L. J., Hirschowitz, S. (2012), Respiratory cytology in the era of molecular diagnostics: A review. Diagn. Cytopathol., 40: 556–563. doi: 10.1002/dc.22858
- †
Ph.: +801-581-2507; Fax: +801-581-7035
Publication History
- Issue published online: 22 MAY 2012
- Article first published online: 22 MAY 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 1 MAR 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 22 FEB 2012
- Manuscript Received: 22 NOV 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- respiratory cytology;
- FNA;
- bronchial washings;
- molecular testing;
- mutational analysis
Abstract
Carcinoma of the lungs remains one of the primary causes of cancer mortality in the United States and represents a significant diagnostic challenge. Current diagnostic protocols depend substantially on cytology as an initial diagnostic modality. Pulmonary cytology can be diagnostically challenging with false positive and false negative diagnoses being relatively frequent. False positive diagnoses remain a significant problem for the cytologist with benign conditions including reactive atypia of type II pneumocytes, reactive bronchial respiratory epithelium, basal cell hyperplasia, and reactive metaplastic squamous cells being potentially misinterpreted as carcinoma. False negative diagnoses also occur usually attributable to sampling. Traditionally, cytopathologists were expected to recognize carcinoma when present and subdivide it into small cell or nonsmall cell varieties. With the advent of targeted therapy, expectations now include separation of adenocarcinoma from squamous cell carcinoma. Additionally, molecular testing for EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements is now required as an accompaniment to morphologic diagnosis. This review summarizes the morphologic appearances of the common and diagnostically important carcinomas of the lung and discusses diagnostic pitfalls responsible for false positive and false negative diagnoses. Molecular testing for selection of targeted therapy is also reviewed. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2012;40:556–563. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

1097-0339/asset/DC_left.gif?v=1&s=8bea6ba8047fec3dc808f0f5f988d23f2ce5f4dc)