Regeneration or scarring: An immunologic perspective
Article first published online: 14 JAN 2003
Copyright © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Special Issue: Regeneration Special Issue
Volume 226, Issue 2, pages 268–279, February 2003
How to Cite
Harty, M., Neff, A. W., King, M. W. and Mescher, A. L. (2003), Regeneration or scarring: An immunologic perspective. Dev. Dyn., 226: 268–279. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.10239
- Issue published online: 28 JAN 2003
- Article first published online: 14 JAN 2003
- Manuscript Accepted: 1 NOV 2002
- Manuscript Received: 15 AUG 2002
- National Science Foundation. Grant Number: HER-0093092-PFI
- Indiana 21st Century Research and Technology Fund
Complete regeneration of complex tissues and organs is usually precluded by fibrotic reactions that lead to scarring. Fish, salamanders, and larval anurans are among the few vertebrates capable of regenerating lost appendages, and this process seems to recapitulate ontogenic development of the structure in most respects. Recent work has revealed a capacity for excellent regeneration in certain mammalian tissues: embryonic or fetal skin and the ear of the MRL mouse. Analyses of these two systems suggest that processes of regenerative growth and patterning for the formation of new structures such as hair follicles may involve modulation of the inflammatory response to the injury in a way that reduces fibrosis and formation of scar tissue. We review evidence that this modulation includes changes in cytokine signaling and may involve properties of the extracellular matrix mediated by factors that include hyaluronic acid and “anti-adhesive substrates” such as tenascin-C. New studies and classic work on the capacity for limb regeneration in amphibians are then reviewed, focusing on the loss of this ability in prometamorphic anuran hindlimbs and the view that changing properties of the immune system may also underlie the declining regenerative potential in this system. Finally, we review recent work in comparative and developmental immunology, which raises the possibility that phylogenetic changes in regenerative capacity may be the result of evolutionary changes in cellular activities of the immune system. Developmental Dynamics 226:268–279, 2003.© 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.