SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Ahlstrom EH, Moser G. 1976. Eggs and larvae of fishes and their role in systematic investigations and in fisheries. Rev Trav Inst Peches Marit 40: 379398.
  • Ahn DG, Gibson G. 1999. Expression patterns of threespine stickleback hox genes and insights into the evolution of the vertebrate body axis. Dev Genes Evol 209: 482494.
  • Alexander RM. 1962. The structure of the Weberian apparatus in the Cyprini. Proc Zool Soc Lond 139: 451473.
  • Arey LB. 1940. Developmental anatomy: a textbook and laboratory manual of embryology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 616 p.
  • Bang PI, Sewell WF, Malicki JJ. 2001. Morphology and cell type heterogeneities of the inner ear epithelia in adult and juvenile zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Comp Neurol 438: 173190.
  • Barman RP. 1991. A taxonomic revision of the Indo-Burmese species of Danio Hamilton-Buchanan (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Rec Zool Sur India Occ Paper 137: 191.
  • Berg LS. 1940. Classification of fishes, both recent and fossil. Trav Inst Zool Acad Sci URSS 5: 345359.
  • Berra TM. 2001. Freshwater fish distribution. San Diego: Academic Press. 604 p.
  • Bever MM, Fekete DM. 2002. Atlas of the developing inner ear in zebrafish. Dev Dyn 223: 536543.
  • Bogutskaya NG. 1991. Development of the Weberian apparatus during ontogeny of some species of Cyprinidae. Vopr Ikhtiol 31: 363372.
  • Burke AC, Nelson CE, Morgan BA, Tabin C. 1995. Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology. Development 121: 333346.
  • Carroll SB, Grenier JK, Weatherbee SD. 2001. From DNA to diversity: molecular genetics and the evolution of animal design. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science. 214 p.
  • Cavender TM, Coburn MM. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of North American Cyprinidae. In: MaydenRL, editor. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Chardon M, Vandewalle P. 1997. Evolutionary trends and possible origin of the Weberian apparatus. Neth J Zool 47: 383403.
  • Chiang EF, Pai CI, Wyatt M, Yan YL, Postlethwait J, Chung B. 2001. Two sox9 genes on duplicated zebrafish chromosomes: expression of similar transcription activators in distinct sites. Dev Biol 231: 149163.
  • Chranilov NS. 1927. Beitrage zur Kenntnis des Weber'schen Apparates der Ostariophysi. I. Vergleichend-anatomische Übersicht der Knochenelemente des Weber'schen apparates bei Cypriniformes. Zool Jahrb 49: 501597.
  • Clark CT, Smith KK. 1993. Cranial osteogenesis in Monodelphis domestica (Didelphidae) and Macropus eugenii (Macropodidae). J Morphol 215: 119149.
  • Coburn MM, Cavender TM. 1992. Interrelationships of North American cyprinid fishes. In: MaydenRL, editor. Systematics, historical ecology, and north american freshwater fishes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Coburn MM, Chai P. 2003. Development of the anterior vertebrae of Chanos chanos (Ostariophysi: Gonorynchiformes). Copeia 2003: 175180.
  • Coburn MM, Futey LM. 1996. The ontogeny of supraneurals and neural arches in the cypriniform Weberian apparatus (Teleostei:Ostariophysi). Zool J Linn Soc 116: 333346.
  • Crotwell PL, Clark TG, Mabee PM. 2001. Gdf5 is expressed in the developing skeleton of median fins of late-stage zebrafish, Danio rerio. Dev Genes Evol 211: 555558.
  • Cubbage CC, Mabee PM. 1996. Development of the cranium and paired fins in the zebrafish, Danio rerio (Ostariophysi, Cyprinidae). J Morphol 229: 121160.
  • Dingerkus G, Uhler D. 1977. Enzyme clearing of Alcian blue stained whole small vertebrates for demonstration of cartilage. Stain Technol 52: 229232.
  • Du SJ, Frenkel V, Kindschi G, Zohar Y. 2001. Visualizing normal and defective bone development in zebrafish embryos using the fluorescent chromophore calcein. Dev Biol 238: 239246.
  • Emelianov SV. 1939. Sequence in the ontogenetic appearance of vertebral arches in teleosts and the omission of chondral stages in their development. C R (Doklady) Acad Sci l'URSS 23: 978981.
  • Evans HM. 1925. A contribution to the anatomy and physiology of the air-bladder and Weberian ossicles in Cyprinidae. Proc R Soc Lond B 97: 545576.
  • Ferreri F, Nicolais C, Boglione C, Bertolini B. 2000. Skeletal characterization of wild and reared zebrafish: anomalies and meristic characters. J Fish Biol 56: 11151128.
  • Fink SV, Fink WL. 1981. Interrelationships of the ostariophysan fishes (Teleostei). Zool J Linn Soc 72: 297353.
  • Fink SV, Fink WL. 1996. Interrelationships of ostariophysan fishes (Teleostei). In: StiassnyMLJ, ParentiLR, JohnsonGD, editors. Interrelationships of fishes. San Diego: Academic Press. p 209249.
  • Fink SV, Greenwood PH, Fink WL. 1984. A critique of recent work on fossil ostariophysan fishes. Copeia 1984: 10331041.
  • Fisher S, Halpern ME. 1999. Patterning the zebrafish axial skeleton requires early chordin function. Nat Genet 23: 442446.
  • Fukushima M, Kohno H, Fujita K, Taki Y. 1992. Ontogenetic development of the Weberian apparatus in the bitterling, Rhodues ocellatus ocellatus. J Tokyo Univ Fish 79: 195200.
  • Gadow H, Abbott EC. 1895. On the evolution of the vertebral column of fishes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 186: 163223.
  • Gayet M. 1982. Consideration sur la Phylogénie et al Paléobiogeographie des Ostariophysaires. Geobios 6: 3952.
  • Gayet M. 1985. Rôle de l'evolution de l'appareil de Weber dans la phylogénie des Ostariophysi suggéré par un nouveau Characiforme du Cénomanien supérieur marin du Portugal. C R Acad Sci Ser II. Mech Phys Chim Sci Terre 300: 895898.
  • Gayet M. 1986. About ostariophysan fishes: a reply to SV Fink, PH Greenwood, and WL Fink's criticisms. Bull Mus Natl Hist Nat Paris 4: 393409.
  • Gemballa S, Britz R. 1998. Homology of intermuscular bones in Acanthomorph fishes. Am Mus Novit 3241: 125.
  • Gilbert SF. 2003. Developmental biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc. 749 p.
  • Grande T, Braun CB. 2002. Evolution of the Weberian apparatus. Bioacoustics 12: 120122.
  • Grande T, De Pinna M. The evolution of the Weberian apparatus: a phylogenetic perspective. In: ArratiaG, SchultzeHP, editors. Mesozoic fishes: systematics, paleoenvironments and biodiversity. Munchen: Verlag Pfeil. (in press).
  • Grandel H, Schulte-Merker S. 1998. The development of the paired fins in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Mech Dev 79: 99120.
  • Griffin KJ, Amacher SL, Kimmel CB, Kimelman D. 1998. Molecular identification of spadetail: regulation of zebrafish trunk and tail mesoderm formation by T-box genes. Development 125: 33793388.
  • Haddon C, Lewis J. 1996. Early ear development in the embryo of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. J Comp Neurol 365: 113128.
  • Haffter P, Granato M, Brand M, Mullins MC, Hammerschmidt M, Kane DA, Odenthal J, van Eeden FJ, Jiang YJ, Heisenberg CP, Kelsh RN, Furutani-Seiki M, Vogelsang E, Beuchle D, Schach U, Fabian C, Nusslein-Volhard C. 1996. The identification of genes with unique and essential functions in the development of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development 123: 136.
  • Helfman GS, Collette BB, Facey DE. 1997. The diversity of fishes. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science. 528 p.
  • Hildebrand M. 1995. Analysis of vertebrate structure. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 657 p.
  • Howes GJ. 1978. The anatomy and relationships of the cyprind fish Luciobrama macrocephalus (Lacepede). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist (Zool) 34: 164.
  • Ichiyanagi T, Kohno H, Fujita K, Taki Y. 1993. Ontogenetic development of the Weberian ossicles in the silurid catfish, Silurus asotus. J Tokyo Univ Fish 80: 205211.
  • Ichiyanagi T, Kohno H, Fujita K, Taki Y. 1996. Ontogenetic development of the Weberian ossicles in two cyprinids, Tribolodon hakonensis and Zacco platypus. J Tokyo Univ Fish 82: 119124.
  • Kanki JP, Ho RK. 1997. The development of the posterior body in zebrafish. Development 124: 881893.
  • Kimelman D, Griffin KJ. 2000. Vertebrate mesendoderm induction and patterning. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10: 350356.
  • Kimmel CB, Miller CT, Kruze G, Ullmann B, BreMiller RA, Larison KD, Snyder HC. 1998. The shaping of pharyngeal cartilages during early development of the zebrafish. Dev Biol 203: 245263.
  • Kimmel CB, Miller CT, Moens CB. 2001. Specification and morphogenesis of the zebrafish larval head skeleton. Dev Biol 233: 239257.
  • König C, Yan YL, Postlethwait J, Wendler S, Campos-Ortega JA. 1999. A recessive mutation leading to vertebral ankylosis in zebrafish is associated with amino acid alterations in the homologue of the human membrane-associated guanylate kinase DLG3. Mech Dev 86: 1728.
  • Kulshrestha SK. 1977. Development of the Weberian apparatus in Indian major carp Labeo rohita (Ham.). Anat Anz 141: 433444.
  • Lauder GV, Liem KF. 1983. The evolution and interrelationships of the actinopterygian fishes. Bull Mus Comp Zool 150: 95197.
  • Leis JM, Trnski T. 1989. The larvae of Indo-Pacific shorefishes. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Mabee PM. 1988. Supraneural and predorsal bones in fishes: development and homologies. Copeia 1988: 827838.
  • Mabee PM, Crotwell PL, Bird NC, Burke AC. 2002. Evolution of median fin modules in the axial skeleton of fishes. J Exp Zool 294: 7790.
  • Matveiev DB. 1929. Die Entwicklung der vorderen Wirbel und des WEBER'schen apparates bei Cyprinidae. Zool Jahrb 51: 463534.
  • Mayden RL. 1989. Phylogenetic studies of North American minnows, with emphasis on the genus Cyprinella (Teleostei: Cypriniformes). Univ Kans Mus Nat Hist Misc Publ 80: 1189.
  • Meyer A, Biermann C, Orti G. 1993. The phylogenetic position of zebrafish (Danio rerio), a model system in developmental biology: an invitation to the comparative method. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 252: 231236.
  • Morin-Kensicki EM, Melancon E, Eisen JS. 2002. Segmental relationship between somites and vertebral column in zebrafish. Development 129: 38513860.
  • Nelson EM. 1948. The comparative morphology of the Weberian apparatus of the Catostomidae and its significance in systematics. J Morphol 83: 225252.
  • Nüsslein-Volhard C, Dahm R. 2002. Zebrafish. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 303 p.
  • Owen R. 1846. Lectures on the comparative anatomy and physiology of the vertebrate animals. I: Fishes. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans. xi + 308 p.
  • Owen R. 1866. The Anatomy of vertebrates. I: Fishes and reptiles. London: Longmans, Green, and Co. xlii + 600 p.
  • Parenti LR. 1986. The phylogenetic significance of bone types in euteleost fishes. Zool J Linn Soc 87: 3751.
  • Patterson C. 1977. Cartilage bones, dermal bones and membrane bones, or the exoskeleton versus the endoskeleton. In: AndrewsSM, MilesRS, WalkerAD, editors. Problems in vertebrate evolution. London: Academic Press. p 77121.
  • Patterson C. 1984. Chanoides, a marine eocene otophysan fish (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). J Vert Paleontol 4: 430456.
  • Patterson C, Johnson GD. 1995. The intermuscular bones and ligaments of teleostean fishes. Smithson Contrib Zool 559: 184.
  • Popper AN, Fay RR. 1999. The auditory periphery in fishes. In: FayRR, PopperAN, editors. Comparative hearing: fish and amphibians. New York: Springer-Verlag. p 43100.
  • Presnell JK, Schreibman MP. 1997. Humason's animal tissue techniques. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Prince VE, Joly L, Ekker M, Ho RK. 1998. Zebrafish hox genes: genomic organization and modified colinear expression patterns in the trunk. Development 125: 407420.
  • Quint E, Smith A, Avaron F, Laforest L, Miles J, Gaffield W, Akimenko MA. 2002. Bone patterning is altered in the regenerating zebrafish caudal fin after ectopic expression of sonic hedgehog and bmp2b or exposure to cyclopamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 87138718.
  • Radermaker F, Surlemont C, Sanna P, Chardon M, Vandewalle P. 1989. Ontogeny of the Weberian apparatus of Clarias gariepinus (Pisces, Siluriformes). Can J Zool 67: 20902097.
  • Ramaswami LS. 1955. Skeleton of cyprinoid fishes in relation to phylogenetic studies: 7. The skull and Weberian apparatus of Cyprininae (Cyprinidae). Acta Zool 36: 144.
  • Rieppel O. 1993. Studies on skeleton formation in reptiles. V. Patterns of ossification in the skeleton of Alligator mississippiensis DAUDIN (Reptilia, Crocodylia). Zool J Linn Soc 109: 301325.
  • Roberts TR, Kottelat M. 1984. Description and osteology of Thryssocypris, a new genus of anchovylike cyprinid fishes, based on two new species from Southeast Asia. Proc Calif Acad Sci 43: 141158.
  • Rosen DE, Greenwood PH. 1970. Origin of the Weberian apparatus and the relationships of the ostariophysan and gonorynchiform fishes. Am Mus Novit 2428: 125.
  • Sanger TJ, McCune AR. 2002. Comparative osteology of the Danio (Cyprinidae: Ostariophysi) axial skeleton with comments on Danio relationships based on molecules and morphology. Zool J Linn Soc 135: 529546.
  • Sarbathi DS. 1932. The endoskeleton of Labeo rohita (Ham. Buch.). J Asiatic Soc Bengal 28: 295347.
  • Schilling TF, Kimmel CB. 1997. Musculoskeletal patterning in the pharyngeal segments of the zebrafish embryo. Development 124: 29452960.
  • Soni DD, Srivastava BK, Zargar V. 1978. The Weberian apparatus in 18 mm embryo of Rasbora daniconius (Ham. Buch.). Folia Morphol 26: 351361.
  • Sordino P, van der Hoeven F, Duboule D. 1995. Hox gene expression in teleost fins and the origin of vertebrate digits. Nature 375: 678681.
  • Vandewalle P, Radermaker F, Surlemont C, Chardon M. 1990. Apparition of the Weberian characters in Barbus barbus (Linne 1758) (Pisces Cyprinidae). Zool Anz 225: 362376.
  • Watson JM. 1939. The development of the Weberian ossicles and anterior vertebrae in the goldfish. Proc R Soc Lond B 127: 452472.
  • Weber EH. 1820. De aure et auditu hominis et animalium, Pars I. De Aure Animalium Aquatilium. Leipzig.
  • Westerfield M. 2000. The zebrafish book. A guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press. 335 p.