Abstract
- Top of page
- Abstract
- INTRODUCTION
- RESULTS
- DISCUSSION
- EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
- REFERENCES
A variety of teratogens induce the loss of postaxial forelimb structures when administered during mid-gestation to the mouse. Previous studies demonstrated that teratogen exposure is associated with a reduction in zone of polarizing activity (ZPA) -related polarizing activity without a noticeable loss of Shh expression. Herein, we quantitatively confirm that expression of Shh, Ptch1, and Gli3 are unaltered by teratogen exposure and demonstrate that sonic hedgehog (Shh) translation is unaffected. Examination of the polarizing response of host chick wings to teratogen-exposed ZPA tissue revealed an induced growth response and ectopic induction of Fgf4, Bmp2, Ptch1, and Gli1 expression similar to control ZPA tissue. Control ZPA tissue altered the fate of cells destined to die in the anterior necrotic zone, whereas cell death ensued in hosts receiving teratogen-exposed grafts. Immunohistochemical studies localized Shh protein in the mouse limb to the posterior mesoderm and overlying ectoderm. We postulate that teratogen exposure alters the ability of Shh to signal to the ectoderm and present microarray and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction data, indicating that Shh signaling could occur in the limb bud ectoderm. Developmental Dynamics 233:313–325, 2005. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
INTRODUCTION
- Top of page
- Abstract
- INTRODUCTION
- RESULTS
- DISCUSSION
- EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
- REFERENCES
The developing limb bud postaxial mesoderm of the chick (Saunders and Gasseling, 1968), mouse (Tickle et al., 1976; Wanek and Bryant, 1991), and other amniotes (Fallon and Crosby, 1977) includes the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA). By definition, transplantation of a tissue that possesses polarizing activity into the anterior margin of a host chick wing bud induces mirror-image digit duplications. The cellular activities required to be induced in the host tissue by a ZPA graft include growth (cell proliferation) and pattern formation. The question of whether these two cellular functions are controlled by a single or multiple signals was discussed by Cooke and Summerbell (1980). At that time, the evidence suggested that multiple signals was the more likely choice. Subsequently, it has been shown that sonic hedgehog (Shh) is a primary component of polarizing activity. This idea is supported by the following observations: (1) the domain of Shh expression in the limb bud is spatially and temporally coincident with that of the ZPA in both the chick and the mouse (Riddle et al., 1993; Chang et al., 1994); (2) other tissues that express Shh also possess polarizing activity (Wagner et al., 1990; Izpisua-Belmonte et al., 1992; Chang et al., 1994; Koyama et al., 1996; Selleck et al., 1996); (3) in the presence of the apical ectodermal ridge (AER), ectopic introduction of Shh into the anterior margin of a chick wing bud induces duplications typical of ZPA grafts (Riddle et al., 1993; Lopez-Martinez et al., 1995; Yang et al., 1998); (4) the AER is required to maintain polarizing activity and Shh expression (Niswander et al., 1993, 1994); (5) ZPA grafts and ectopic Shh induce ectopic anterior domains of Fgf4, Hoxd-13, Ptch1, and Bmp2 (Izpisúa-Belmonte et al., 1991; Francis et al., 1994; Niswander et al., 1994; Marigo et al., 1996b; Yang et al., 1997); (6) Shh has been shown to possess proliferative and cell fate activity in other developing organ systems (Roelink et al., 1994; Bellusci et al., 1997; Roberts et al., 1998; Ahlgren and Bronner-Fraser, 1999; Haraguchi et al., 2001).
Despite this impressive evidence, our previous observations made us question whether there is a direct relationship between Shh and polarizing activity because exposure to select teratogens could induce the loss of posterior digits, abolish polarizing activity but not noticeably affect Shh expression in the posterior limb bud mesenchyme (Bell et al., 1999; Scott et al., 2005). We further showed that the expression of Patched (Ptch1), the hedgehog receptor whose expression is exquisitely sensitive to Shh activity, was unaltered by teratogen exposure.
The present studies examine Shh status in the teratogen-exposed mouse limb bud and the cellular and molecular changes in the host chick limb after grafting teratogen-exposed or control mouse embryo ZPA tissue. Our findings suggest that teratogen exposure disrupts Shh signaling by a mechanism independent of effects on Shh transcription/translation and that physiological doses of Shh required to induce ectopic domains of downstream target genes are insufficient to alter the developmental fate of cells within the anterior necrotic zone (ANZ) of the host chick wing. We also suggest that teratogen exposure alters the ability of Shh to directly signal to the posterior limb ectoderm/AER and that it is the alteration of this event not the loss of polarizing activity that leads to the loss of posterior structures.
DISCUSSION
- Top of page
- Abstract
- INTRODUCTION
- RESULTS
- DISCUSSION
- EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
- REFERENCES
Our previous studies on mouse embryos exposed during mid-gestation to teratogens that induce postaxial forelimb ectrodactyly revealed that drug-exposed postaxial limb mesenchyme expressed Shh but lacked “polarizing activity,” the ability to induce digit duplications when grafted to the anterior mesenchyme of a stage 20 chick wing bud (Bell et al., 1999; Scott et al., 2005). The data presented herein has further explored the inability of teratogen-exposed ZPA tissue to induce digit duplications. Using an in vitro Shh signaling assay in which the ability of limb bud cell lysates to activate a Gli-responsive promoter in Shh-LIGHT2 cells revealed that teratogen-exposed lysates exhibited reduced Shh signaling activity compared with controls. However, RT-PCR and Western blotting indicated that the diminished Shh signaling activity could not be attributed to differences in the levels of Shh transcription or translation within the teratogen-exposed tissue. These observations are in contrast to that observed in Wnt7a−/− (Parr and McMahon, 1995; Adamska et al., 2004) and MHoxCre/Shhfloxed animals that also exhibit postaxial ectrodactyly but with detectable reductions in the level of Shh expression (Lewis et al., 2001).
The inability of teratogen-exposed ZPA tissue to induce a duplication is perplexing because teratogen-exposed ZPA tissue can induce many of the early events classically considered as part of a polarizing response, including expansion of the anterior chick wing margin, anterior AER expression of Fgf4, and ectopic domains of Ptch1, Bmp2, and Gli1. However, in contrast to control ZPA tissue, teratogen-exposed ZPA grafts were unable to respecify the developmental fate of cells normally destined to die within the ANZ of the host chick wing. Although previous studies have demonstrated that the duplicating effect of recombinant Shh on the anterior limb mesenchyme is dose and time dependent, a correlation between induction of ectopic anterior mesenchymal gene expression domains and duplicating activity has only been reported for Bmp7, Hoxd13, and Hoxd11(Yang et al., 1997). In this study, we have examined the ability of teratogen-exposed ZPA tissue to ectopically up-regulate anterior expression of Bmp2, Ptch1, Gli1, Gremlin, and Fgf4. We observed that, like control ZPA tissue, teratogen-exposed ZPA tissue could up-regulate anterior expression of Bmp2, Ptch1, Gli1, and Fgf4. To date, Bmp2, Ptch1, and Gli1 have only been demonstrated to be up-regulated after ectopic overexpression of either dHand or Shh (Laufer et al., 1994; Marigo et al., 1996a, b; Yang et al., 1997; Drossopoulou et al., 2000; Fernandez-Teran et al., 2000). Of interest, although misexpression of dHand consistently induced ectopic anterior domains of Gli1 and Ptch1, an ectopic Shh expression domain was not usually detected, suggesting that either undetectable low levels of Shh are required for the induction of these genes or that other signaling molecules can also induce their expression (Fernandez-Teran et al., 2000). The LIGHT2 cell assay suggests that teratogen-exposed ZPA tissue does possess a low level of Shh signaling activity. However, the observed expansion of the anterior wing margin, anterior AER, and induction of Fgf4 expression in response to teratogen-exposed ZPA tissue could be attributed to the presence of other signaling molecules within the grafted tissue such as Bmp2 or Gremlin. Bmp2-expressing cells do not induce ectopic Bmp2 expression domains in a host chick wing but can induce anterior AER expression of Fgf4, a growth response by the anterior mesenchyme, an ectopic Hoxd expression domain, and a low incidence of extra digit 2s (Duprez et al., 1996). Ectopic Gremlin expression can also induce alterations in Fgf4 expression and expansion of the anterior wing margin, without inducing digit duplications (Capdevilla et al., 1999).
Recent studies have suggested that Shh up-regulates expression of Gremlin, which then signals to the ectoderm to regulate formation/maintenance of the AER (Zuniga et al., 1999; Michos et al., 2004). Although teratogen-exposed ZPA tissue was unable to induce an ectopic anterior domain of Gremlin expression in the chick host, Gremlin expression within the mouse limb appeared normal in teratogen-exposed limb buds (data not shown). Furthermore, although the anterior and distal portions of the AER are maintained in teratogen-exposed limb buds, the dorsal and ventral boundaries are not smooth and the entire posterior portion of the AER is lost (Bell et al., 1999). These observations are in contrast to the inability of Shh and Gremlin mutants to maintain a functional AER (Zuniga et al., 1999; Sun et al., 2000; Chiang et al., 2001; Kraus et al., 2001; Khokha et al., 2003; Ros et al., 2003; Michos et al., 2004). Loss of the posterior AER margin in teratogen-exposed embryos is reminiscent of animals deficient in expression of the dorsal ectoderm marker Wnt7a (Parr and McMahon, 1995; Adamska et al., 2004). Based on these observations and others, it has been proposed that there is a feedback loop between the three limb axes where both the dorsal ectoderm and the AER are involved in the maintenance of Shh expression/the ZPA (Niswander, 2003). In return, Shh has been postulated to maintain the AER through Gremlin (Zuniga et al., 1999; Khokha et al., 2003). We suggest that Shh signaling may also maintain the posterior AER by directly signaling to the non-AER ectoderm overlying the ZPA. Data herein and previous immunohistochemistry studies localized high levels of Shh protein not only in the limb mesoderm but also in the overlying posterior ectoderm (Fig. 4D; Gritli-Linde et al., 2001). Furthermore, we have performed microchip array experiments on isolated ectodermal hulls from emerging stage 1.5 limb buds that had no detectable mesenchymal Shh expression and stage 4 limb buds with a prominent mesenchymal Shh domain and mature AER. Within the ectoderm, there is no evidence of Shh expression at either developmental stage, yet, there is an up-regulation of Ptch1, Ptch2, and Gli1 expression in the ectoderm of stage 4 limbs and high levels of Smo expression are detected at both stages. Quantitative RT-PCR and section in situ hybridization confirmed the presence of Ptch1 expression in the ectoderm, consistent with previous section in situ data indicating that, although Ptch1 expression is not detected in the AER, it is in the ectoderm overlying the ZPA (Hahn et al., 1996). Dogma would suggest that Ptch1 expression is restricted to the mesoderm; however, few section in situ data of Ptch1 in the limb are present within the literature and what are present are data acquired from whole-mount protocols, which may have destroyed the overlying ectoderm. Supportive of the argument that Shh signals directly to the ectoderm are recent studies using a Gli1-inducible CreERT2 transgenic line to fate map cells responding to Shh signaling (Ahn and Joyner, 2004). These studies revealed that Shh signaling occurs in the posterior limb ectoderm and its positive aspects are mediated by Gli2. The limb ectoderm's responsiveness to Shh signaling is also indicated by the unexpected observation that Ptch1 is induced in the chick wing dorsal ectoderm in response to overexpression of a Gli-VP16 fusion protein containing the Gli zinc-finger DNA binding domain (Marigo et al., 1996b). Notably, although the fusion protein was expressed in the mesenchyme and ectoderm, ectopic Ptch1 was only observed in the ectoderm. Thus, it is plausible that teratogenic insult may interfere with the ability of Shh to directly signal to the ectoderm, resulting in a lack of proper formation of the posterior AER. Because recent fate mapping studies in the limb have revealed that the Shh-expressing cells give rise predominantly to the fourth and fifth digits (Harfe et al., 2004), the absence of the posterior AER in teratogen-exposed embryos would prohibit expansion of this population of precursor cells resulting in the observed malformations. The observation that teratogen exposure only induces these defects during the window when both the ZPA and AER are initially being formed suggests that regulation of this interrelationship occurs early in the ontogeny of both signaling centers, yet manifestation of the upset as detected by alteration in the expression of known molecular markers is delayed (Bell et al., 1999). A similar delay is seen in Shh−/− mutant limbs, where the AER precursors are properly initiated yet, in the absence of Shh, the AER begins to deteriorate (Sun et al., 2000; Chiang et al., 2001; Kraus et al., 2001; Ros et al., 2003). In the Shh−/− mouse embryo this begins by E10.5, the time at which teratogen-induced perturbations in the posterior margin of the AER become first evident. These results indicate that the components of the regulatory relationship between the ZPA, dorsal and ventral ectoderm, and the AER are not yet clearly defined and await further discovery.
It is currently unclear how teratogen-exposure disrupts Shh signaling. RT-PCR and Western blot analysis suggest that Shh transcription and translation are not disrupted by teratogen-exposure. Other putative sites of teratogen interference include (1) improper posttranslational processing of Shh, (2) a failure of mature Shh to be secreted from the cell, or (3) the induction or activation of a Shh signaling inhibitor by teratogen exposure. Posttranslational processing of the 45-kDa Shh protein includes an autocleavage event to yield the 19-kDa ShhN fragment responsible for signaling. This fragment is then modified by the addition of cholesterol to its new C-terminus and palmitate to the N-terminus (for review, see Ingham and McMahon, 2001). We believe that teratogen exposure does not alter normal proteolytic cleavage of Shh because this is the predominant form detected by the Western blot analysis. Furthermore, the genetic abolition of cholesterol or palmitate addition yields a limb phenotype with missing central digits, not the phenotype postaxial ectrodactyly associated with teratogen exposure (Lewis et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2004). Alternatively, reduced Shh signaling by grafted teratogen-exposed ZPA tissue could be explained by alterations in Shh secretion thought to be facilitated by Dispatched (Ingham and McMahon, 2001). This protein, as well as the Shh receptor Ptch, belong to a family of RND permeases (Tseng et al., 1999). These proteins function in prokaryotes as proton-driven efflux pumps to secrete drugs, heavy metals, or endogenous molecules (Nies, 1995; Tseng et al., 1999). This function is a potential site of teratogen perturbation because acetazolamide does disrupt acid/base balance and has been shown to lower pH in the mouse embryo limb bud (Schreiner et al., 1995). However, this explanation also is not completely satisfactory, because a teratogen-induced disruption in Shh release from expressing cells should be overcome in the LIGHT2 assays using cell lysates, yet these assays also indicate little Shh signaling activity. Teratogen exposure could also affect Shh multimerization (Zeng et al., 2001); however, the site, mechanism, and functional importance of multimerization have not yet been elucidated.
An alternative possibility is that teratogen-exposure induces or activates an inhibitor of Shh signaling. Schaller and Muneoka (2001) previously suggested the existence of a polarizing activity inhibitor normally made in the anterior mesenchyme that interacts with heparin sulfate moieties in the extracellular matrix. Gas-1 is normally expressed in the anterior mesenchyme and can act as an inhibitor of Shh activity (Lee, 2001; Liu et al., 2002). Hedgehog interacting protein was identified as an inhibitor of Shh activity expressed in the posterior limb mesenchyme; however, its putative alteration by teratogen exposure is not known (Chuang and McMahon, 1999). Favoring the existence of an inhibitor is our previous result that, upon recombining teratogen-exposed mesoderm with control ectoderm for only 2 hr, polarizing activity was restored, but only if the normal anterior–posterior polarity of the ectoderm and mesoderm were maintained. These observations suggest that the postaxial ectoderm produces a factor that can relieve the teratogen-induced inhibitory effect on “polarizing activity.”
In summary, we have shown that teratogen exposure leading to postaxial forelimb ectrodactyly is accompanied by lowered Shh signaling. The level of signaling, approximately 25% of normal, is sufficient to up-regulate many of the processes that are needed for polarizing activity but is insufficient to respecify the cell death program in anterior limb mesenchyme cells. We also provide evidence indicating that Shh may signal directly to the limb bud ectoderm and suggest that this direct signaling is required for maintenance of the posterior AER.