SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Acevedo LG, Iniguez AL, Holster HL, Zhang X, Green R, Farnham PJ. 2007. Genome-scale ChIP-chip analysis using 10,000 human cells. BioTechniques 43: 791797.
  • Dahl JA, Collas P. 2008. A rapid micro chromatin immunoprecipitation assay (microChIP). Nat Protoc 3: 10321045.
  • Frank SR, Schroeder M, Fernandez P, Taubert S, Amati B. 2001. Binding of c-Myc to chromatin mediates mitogen-induced acetylation of histone H4 and gene activation. In: Genes Dev 15: 20692082.
  • Green DM, Sessions SK. 1991. Amphibian cytogenetics and evolution. San Diego: Academic Press. xv, 456 p.
  • Heasman J, Kofron M, Wylie C. 2000. Beta-catenin signaling activity dissected in the early Xenopus embryo: a novel antisense approach. Dev Biol 222: 124134.
  • Jallow Z, Jacobi UG, Weeks DL, Dawid IB, Veenstra GJ. 2004. Specialized and redundant roles of TBP and a vertebrate-specific TBP paralog in embryonic gene regulation in Xenopus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 1352513530.
  • Kim SW, Park JI, Spring CM, Sater AK, Ji H, Otchere AA, Daniel JM, McCrea PD. 2004. Non-canonical Wnt signals are modulated by the Kaiso transcriptional repressor and p120-catenin. Nat Cell Biol 6: 12121220.
  • Kuo MH, Allis CD. 1999. In vivo cross-linking and immunoprecipitation for studying dynamic Protein:DNA associations in a chromatin environment. Methods 19: 425433.
  • Luo RX, Postigo AA, Dean DC. 1998. Rb interacts with histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Cell 8: 425433.
  • Messenger NJ, Kabitschke C, Andrews R, Grimmer D, Núñez Miguel R, Blundell TL, Smith JC, Wardle FC. 2005. Functional specificity of the Xenopus T-domain protein Brachyury is conferred by its ability to interact with Smad1. Dev Cell 8: 599610.
  • Molenaar M, van de Wetering M, Oosterwegel M, Peterson-Maduro J, Godsave S, Korinek V, Roose J, Destrée O, Clevers H. 1996. XTcf-3 transcription factor mediates beta-catenin-induced axis formation in Xenopus embryos. Cell 86: 391399.
  • Morgan MJ, Woltering JM, In der Rieden PM, Durston AJ, Thiery JP. 2004. YY1 regulates the neural crest-associated slug gene in Xenopus laevis. J Biol Chem 279: 4682646834.
  • Ng R, Gurdon J. 2008. Epigenetic memory of an active gene state depends on histone H3.3 incorporation into chromatin in the absence of transcription. Nat Cell Biol 10: 102109.
  • O'Neill LP, Turner BM. 2003. Immunoprecipitation of native chromatin: NChIP. Methods 31: 7682.
  • O'Neill LP, VerMilyea MD, Turner BM. 2006. Epigenetic characterization of the early embryo with a chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol applicable to small cell populations. Nat Genet 38: 835841.
  • Orlando V, Strutt H, Paro R. 1997. Analysis of chromatin structure by in vivo formaldehyde cross-linking. Methods 11: 205214.
  • Park JI, Kim SW, Lyons JP, Ji H, Nguyen TT, Cho K, Barton MC, Deroo T, Vleminckx K, Moon RT, McCrea PD. 2005. Kaiso/p120-catenin and TCF/beta-catenin complexes coordinately regulate canonical Wnt gene targets. Dev Cell 8: 843854.
  • Rex M, Hilton E, Old R. 2002. Multiple interactions between maternally-activated signalling pathways control Xenopus nodal-related genes. Int J Dev Biol 46: 217226.
  • Roh TY, Cuddapah S, Zhao K. 2005. Active chromatin domains are defined by acetylation islands revealed by genome-wide mapping. Genes Dev 19: 542552.
  • Sambrook J, Russell DW. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. ix, 338 p.
  • Shen MM. 2007. Nodal signaling: developmental roles and regulation. Development 134: 10231034.
  • Sive HL, Grainger RM, Harland RM. 2000. Early development of Xenopus laevis: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  • Takahashi S, Yokota C, Takano K, Tanegashima K, Onuma Y, Goto J, Asashima M. 2000. Two novel nodal-related genes initiate early inductive events in Xenopus Nieuwkoop center. Development 127: 53195329.
  • Taneyhill LA, Adams MS. 2008. Investigating regulatory factors and their DNA binding affinities through real time quantitative PCR (RT-QPCR) and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays. Methods Cell Biol 87: 367389.
  • Watabe T, Kim S, Candia A, Rothbächer U, Hashimoto C, Inoue K, Cho KW. 1995. Molecular mechanisms of Spemann's organizer formation: conserved growth factor synergy between Xenopus and mouse. Genes Dev 9: 30383050.
  • Wickbom T. 1945. Cytological studies on Dipnoi, Urodela, Anura, and Emys. Hereditas 31: 241345.
  • Xanthos JB, Kofron M, Tao Q, Schaible K, Wylie C, Heasman J. 2002. The roles of three signaling pathways in the formation and function of the Spemann Organizer. Development 129: 40274043.
  • Yang J, Tan C, Darken RS, Wilson PA, Klein PS. 2002. Beta-catenin/Tcf-regulated transcription prior to the midblastula transition. Development 129: 57435752.
  • Zeng PY, Vakoc CR, Chen ZC, Blobel GA, Berger SL. 2006. In vivo dual cross-linking for identification of indirect DNA-associated proteins by chromatin immunoprecipitation. BioTechniques 41: 694, 696, 698.