- Top of page
- Earn CE credit for this article!
Sociocultural agents, such as peers, parents, and the media, are hypothesized to contribute to the development of eating disordered attitudes and behaviors.1, 2 Influences from one's immediate subculture may consist of potent messages regarding the need to conform to the societal standard of thinness. These influences are thought to significantly affect the development of body image disturbances and disordered eating. Potential pathways of influence include both direct and indirect messages from parents and peers. Longitudinal studies have indicated that eating disorders are most likely to emerge during late adolescence,3, 4 suggesting it is a critical period for investigating parental and peer influences.
As primary socialization agents, parents are theorized to influence the development of eating disturbances by reinforcing societal messages regarding the importance of thinness, even in late adolescence.5, 6 Empirical support for indirect parental influence on older adolescents includes the adolescent's perception of family internalization of the thin-ideal7, 8 and adolescents' experience of thin-ideal pressure from parents.9 The indirect influence of maternal body dissatisfaction on younger and older adolescents' eating disorder symptoms has been supported in the literature,10–12 with some exceptions.13, 14 However, researchers have found that the less well-studied paternal dieting and body dissatisfaction has less empirical support for influencing eating disorder symptoms among adolescents.15, 16
Direct messages from parents may also play an etiologic role in the development of eating disorders.17 Negative comments, especially by mothers, encouraging their daughter's weight loss are correlated with disordered eating and drive for thinness among young adolescents.11, 18, 19 In addition, negative comments by fathers may also be associated with disordered eating among adolescents though more conclusive research is needed.15, 20
Researchers have also examined how levels of parental support may be related to child and adolescent eating disorder behaviors and symptoms. Lack of parental support and support that is perceived to be conditional to meeting appearance expectations may promote body dissatisfaction and disordered eating among young adolescents.21, 22 Barker and Galambos23 found that greater maternal support is associated with greater body satisfaction among early adolescents. In addition, one prospective study found that deficits in parental support predicted future increases in body dissatisfaction among adolescent girls, aged 11–15,24 though other prospective studies have yielded null effects.25, 26 More research is needed to determine how maternal support influences older adolescents' eating disorder risk factors and symptoms.
Peers also seem to influence the development of adolescent girls' body image and eating behaviors. Peer groups often have similar levels of body image concerns, frequency of extreme weight-loss behaviors, and dietary restraint.27 Peer influences, such as interpersonal pressure to be thin and criticism about appearance, correlate with body dissatisfaction and disordered eating among adolescent females, aged 11–17.28 For middle and late adolescence, Shomaker and Furman1 found that adolescents' perceived pressure to be thin and friends' reports of the pressure to be thin predicted future increases in disordered eating among adolescents. Likewise, perceived peer endorsement of the thin-ideal and peer modeling of eating disordered behaviors correlated with bulimic symptoms and increased risk for future onset of symptoms in adolescent girls.8
Cross-sectional studies indicate that attitudes about eating and eating-related behaviors are more similar among individuals who self-select housemates than among those whose housemates who are randomly selected and that individuals in friendship cliques have similar levels of body image concerns, dietary restraint, and extreme weight loss behaviors.27, 29 There is also evidence that subcultural norms in friendship groups can influence eating disordered attitudes and behaviors over time. For example, research suggests that socialization among peers results in a convergence of body image concerns and restrictive attitudes30 and bulimic symptoms29 among peer groups. Moreover, this influence appears to increase with increasing amounts of contact with selected peers. The quality of peer relationships may also play a role in eating-disordered attitudes and behaviors28 because adolescents may attempt to conform to the thin-ideal as a means to gain greater acceptance from peers. Additional research would help to further elucidate the effects of interpersonal variables, such as social support, on eating disorder symptoms.
Most prior studies examining parental and peer influences on eating disorders among adolescents have been cross-sectional, making it impossible to determine whether the influences predate the emergence of eating pathology. Further, few studies have investigated the potential impact of messages from both parents and peers. Thus, the purpose of this study was to test whether peer and maternal attitudes and behaviors predict future increases in eating disorder risk factors (thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction) and eating disorder symptoms. We focused on mothers because the literature suggests they may have a greater influence than fathers on their daughter's eating disorder symptoms. We also examined peer influences because they may be particularly salient socialization agents during late adolescence and the transition to college. Most prior research has relied solely on adolescent report of perceived parental or peer influences (versus direct reports from parents and peers), used cross-sectional designs, and relied upon only questionnaire data to assess disordered eating. To our knowledge, this is the first study using adolescent as well as mother and peer report, a prospective design, and structured diagnostic interviews to assess adolescent eating pathology. We hypothesized that maternal and peer thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, and eating disorder symptoms, pressure to be thin, and deficits in maternal and peer social support would predict future increases in eating disorder risk factors and symptoms among adolescents.
- Top of page
- Earn CE credit for this article!
Mixed effects regression models40, 41 estimated with SAS (version 9.0) PROC MIXED were used to model the developmental trajectories of adolescent thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, and bulimic symptoms from study waves T1 to T4. These multilevel models of change are especially suited to the analysis of longitudinal studies, providing solutions to such common problems as missing data, irregular measurement occasions, and serial correlations.42 Models were specified with a random intercept (defined at T1), a random trajectory, and an unstructured covariance structure.
A two step process was used to assess predictors of change in adolescent thin ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, and bulimic symptoms (see Table 1 for means and standard deviations). First, a univariate model for each parent and peer measure hypothesized to influence the adolescent developmental trajectories was individually added and then removed from the model. Next, each parent or peer measure from the univariate analysis that marginally (p < 0.10) predicted intercept or trajectory was simultaneously entered into a final multivariate model. Use of a more traditional level (p < 0.05) during univariable analysis often fails to identify variables known to be important43, 44 as it does not accommodate the possibility that a weak association with an outcome can become stronger in a multivariate analysis. Interpretation of multivariate effects was set at p < 0.05. At each step, effect size is summarized by the r equivalent45 and is appropriate where no generally accepted effect size estimate exists, as is the case with mixed effects models.
Maximum likelihood estimation allowed for the use of all available adolescent data and provided unbiased results, assuming the data were missing at random.46 In the present study, missing adolescent data (1% at T2, 3% at T3, 7% at T4) did not appear to represent a meaningful departure from the missing-at-random assumption, meaning that missing data were not likely to depend on unobserved determinants of the outcome of interest.47 Missing data for the parent and peer predictors at T1 ranged from 8 to 20%. A maximum-likelihood estimate was used to impute missing data (SPSS Missing Value Analysis module: SPSS, 2006) for parent and peer predictors as it produces more accurate and efficient parameter estimates than list-wise deletion.
Each parent and peer measure assessed at T1 (see Table 2 for means and standard deviations) was individually added and then removed from the model to determine its unique influence on the adolescent intercept and developmental trajectories and identify predictors to include for the multivariate models. A higher score for adolescent thin ideal at the T1 intercept was significantly associated with a higher parent thin ideal score (estimate = 0.171, SE = 0.041, t = 4.24, p < 0.001, r = 0.19), a higher peer thin ideal score (estimate = 0.157, SE = 0.043, t = 3.64, p < 0.001, r = 0.16) and was marginally associated with a higher parent body dissatisfaction score (estimate = 0.057, SE = 0.035, t = 1.69, p= 0.091, r = 0.08). A lower score for adolescent thin ideal at T1 was marginally associated with a higher peer bulimic symptom score (estimate = −0.075, SE = 0.042, t = −1.78, p = 0.076, r= 0.08). No parent or peer measure predicted change in the adolescent thin ideal developmental trajectory. In addition, no parent or peer measures were associated with initial adolescent level of body dissatisfaction or developmental trajectory. A higher parent thin ideal score was significantly associated with an increasing adolescent bulimic symptom trajectory during the developmental period (estimate = 0.018, SE = 0.009, t = 2.08, p = 0.038, r = 0.10). Finally, higher levels of parental pressure to be thin was marginally associated with higher levels of adolescent bulimic symptoms at T1 (estimate = 0.041, SE = 0.021, t = 1.93, p = 0.054, r = 0.09).
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for adolescent outcomes
Table 2. Descriptive statistics for parent and peer measures at T1
|Pressure to be thin||1.96||0.74||1.84||0.68|
Multivariate analysis of adolescent thin ideal showed parent thin ideal (estimate = 0.146, SE = 0.041, t = 3.55, p < 0.001, r = 0.16), peer thin ideal internalization (estimate = 0.140, SE = 0.046, t = 3.05, p = 0.002, r = 0.14), and peer bulimic symptoms (estimate = −0.111, SE = 0.042, t = −2.58, p = 0.010, r = 0.12) were significant predictors of an adolescent T1 measure of thin ideal internalization. No significant or marginally significant univariate predictors were found for adolescent body dissatisfaction so a multivariate model wasnot warranted. Multivariate analysis of adolescent bulimic symptoms showed parent thin ideal significantly predicted change in adolescent bulimic symptoms during the developmental period (estimate = 0.021, SE = 0.009, t = 2.27, p = 0.023, r = 0.10).
- Top of page
- Earn CE credit for this article!
Consistent with previous research, the results provide support for the hypothesis that eating disorder risk factors and symptoms increase over time.4, 48 For study participants, adolescent thin-ideal internalization and bulimic symptoms increased during the transition from adolescence to young adulthood (T1-T4) whereas body dissatisfaction decreased and then increased again over the study period. These results suggest that while adolescent participants were internalizing the thin-ideal and participating in bulimic behaviors to a greater degree over time, body dissatisfaction seemed to decrease initially and then increase again during the transition to college. Perhaps this is because sexual relations may become more normative in late adolescence, which may give rise to an increase in body dissatisfaction.
Unexpectedly, there were no significant predictors of future increases in adolescent thin ideal internalization or body dissatisfaction. It is possible that that parents and peers may actually have little impact in this regard and that possibly other factors, such as media are more impactful. Another explanation may be that the effects of maternal and peer factors on thin ideal internalization and body dissatisfaction among adolescents may be more salient during preadolescence and early to middle adolescence, versus during the transition to college when peer networks often are shifting and mothers are less influential in their children's everyday lives. Study findings do not provide support for the notion that girls will imitate their mothers' body image dissatisfaction, at least into young adulthood. Although some cross-sectional studies have demonstrated a link between maternal and adolescent body image dissatisfaction,11, 49 this relation has not emerged in prospective studies. This suggests that the direction of effects may be in the opposite direction (i.e., eating and weight disturbances in the child may increase those patterns in their parents) or that the maternal and peer variables measured in this study are not the most potent risk factors for the development of body dissatisfaction in late adolescents. It is also noteworthy that there were no peer predictive effects found in this study which is inconsistent with a few longitudinal findings.1, 8 One reason for this finding may be that adolescents in the study nominated their best friend as the “peer informant” and these close friends may provide much more positive support than negative.
Of note, maternal thin ideal internalization did emerge as a significant predictor of future increases in adolescent bulimic symptoms. In addition, maternal pressure to be thin was also a marginally significant predictor of adolescent bulimic symptoms for the trajectory of the study. These significant results are consistent with previous cross sectional and longitudinal research findings in that mothers and peers have been shown to influence the development of eating disturbances by reinforcing societal messages regarding the importance of thinness.1, 9, 50 Given that adolescents are already receiving messages from their larger social contexts about the importance of being thin, it makes sense that when an adolescent also receives similar messages from her mother that she would take extreme measures (disordered eating behaviors) to conform.
It is important to note the limitations of this study. First, no data were collected from fathers or multiple peers. Despite this limitation, the study did rely on the report of multiple informants to avoid any limitations associated with obtaining only a single perspective.51 Second, there is limited data on the reliability and validity of two of the study measures: social support and pressure to be thin; however, these results indicate that both measures showed internal consistency. Finally, the recruitment rate was low (56%), suggesting results should be generalized with care.
Conclusions and Implications for Future Research
This study provides partial support for the theory that some attitudes and behaviors of mothers and peers increase risk for future escalations in eating disorder symptoms. Future research studies should further examine the effects of maternal and peer influences on adolescent eating disturbances by using prospective designs that collect data from multiple informants at multiple time points, perhaps focusing on a younger developmental period. Such findings will help the prevention field further elucidate and clarify which risk factors are most salient in the development of eating disturbances for late adolescents and young adults and also track trends in how parent and peer influences shift as an adolescent transitions into young adulthood. The findings of this study underscore the importance of eating disorder prevention programs that are empirically based and informed by risk factor research that has used prospective and rigorous designs.