Weight Suppression in Bulimia Nervosa: Relationship with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Outcome

Authors

  • Hayley Dawkins BSc (Hons),

    1. School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Hunna J. Watson PhD, MPsych (Clin),

    Corresponding author
    1. School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
    2. Centre for Clinical Interventions, Department of Health in Western Australia, Perth, Australia
    3. Eating Disorders Program, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Australia
    4. School of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
    • Correspondence to: Dr. Hunna Watson, Centre for Clinical Interventions, 223 James St., Northbridge, 6004 Western Australia, Australia. E-mail: hunna.watson@health.wa.gov.au

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Sarah J. Egan PhD, MPsych (Clin),

    1. School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Robert T. Kane PhD

    1. School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

ABSTRACT

Objective

In light of prior inconsistent findings, this study revisits the relationship between weight suppression and treatment outcome in bulimia nervosa. Aside from differences in methodology, we propose that moderator effects may assist the field in interpreting previous inconsistency. In this study, we considered moderators that might place individuals at risk of broad cognitive and biobehavioral mechanisms implicated in weight (dys)regulation and binge eating, and that within the context of a history of weight suppression, might be associated with especially poor outcomes.

Method

Participants were 117 female outpatients aged 16–54 years (M = 25.5) with bulimic disorders treated with enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy.

Results

Logistic regression indicated that higher pretreatment weight suppression did not predict drop-out or poor treatment outcome (nonabstinence from binging and purging). Moderators of parental history of overweight, childhood body shape, pretreatment body mass index, and the difference between highest and lowest ever adult body weight were analyzed, but no moderator effects were apparent.

Discussion

This study, along with other negative studies, calls into question the association between weight suppression and treatment outcome. We maintain that moderators may account for inconsistencies, but no candidates were identified in this study. Moderator models could assist us to refine conceptualizations of why some patients high in weight suppression may be vulnerable to poor treatment adherence and outcome and to establish clinical interventions that enhance prognosis. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2013; 46:586–593)

Ancillary