This study was supported by a research grant from the Hamilton Academic Health Sciences Organization. Dr. Susan Jack is supported by a New Investigator Personnel Award from the Institute of Human Development (Child and Youth Health, Reproduction and Child Health) within the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Dr. Gail McVey is supported by a Mid-Career Personnel Award from CIHR.
Decision-making processes for the uptake and implementation of family-based therapy by eating disorder treatment teams: A qualitative study
Article first published online: 14 SEP 2013
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Volume 47, Issue 1, pages 32–39, January 2014
How to Cite
Kimber, M., Couturier, J., Jack, S., Niccols, A., Van Blyderveen, S. and McVey, G. (2014), Decision-making processes for the uptake and implementation of family-based therapy by eating disorder treatment teams: A qualitative study. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 47: 32–39. doi: 10.1002/eat.22185
- Issue published online: 10 DEC 2013
- Article first published online: 14 SEP 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 5 AUG 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 4 JUL 2013
- Manuscript Received: 4 MAR 2013
- evidence-based practice;
- implementation science;
- knowledge translation;
- Family-Based Treatment;
- evidence-based treatment
To explore the decision-making processes involved in the uptake and implementation of evidence-based treatments (EBTs), namely, family-based treatment (FBT), among therapists and their administrators within publically funded eating disorder treatment programs in Ontario, Canada.
Fundamental qualitative description guided sampling, data collection, and analytic decisions. Forty therapists and 11 administrators belonging to a network of clinicians treating eating disorders completed an in-depth interview regarding the decision-making processes involved in EBT uptake and implementation within their organizations. Content analysis and the constant comparative technique were used to analyze interview transcripts, with 20% of the data independently double-coded by a second coder.
Therapists and their administrators identified the importance of an inclusive change culture in evidence-based practice (EBP) decision-making. Each group indicated reluctance to make EBP decisions in isolation from the other. Additionally, participants identified seven stages of decision-making involved in EBT adoption, beginning with exposure to the EBT model and ending with evaluating the impact of the EBT on patient outcomes. Support for a stage-based decision-making process was in participants' indication that the stages were needed to demonstrate that they considered the costs and benefits of making a practice change. Participants indicated that EBTs endorsed by the Provincial Network for Eating Disorders or the Academy for Eating Disorders would more likely be adopted.
Future work should focus on integrating the important decision-making processes identified in this study with known implementation models to increase the use of low-cost and effective treatments, such as FBT, within eating disorder treatment programs. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2014; 47:32–39)