Mating system variation drives rapid evolution of the female transcriptome in Drosophila pseudoobscura
Version of Record online: 5 MAY 2014
© 2014 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Ecology and Evolution
Volume 4, Issue 11, pages 2186–2201, June 2014
How to Cite
Ecology and Evolution 2014; 4(11):2186–2201
- Issue online: 3 JUN 2014
- Version of Record online: 5 MAY 2014
- Manuscript Accepted: 8 APR 2014
- Manuscript Received: 1 APR 2014
- Marie Curie Initial Training Network. Grant Number: ITN-2008- 213780
- Natural Environment Research Council. Grant Number: NE/I014632/1
- National Science Foundation
Table S1. All the differentially expressed genes between experimentally evolved polyandrous (E) and monandrous (M) females of D. pseudoobscura.
Table S2–12. Clusters of enriched functional annotation terms (DAVID) for all the differentially expressed genes by tissue. The tissues presented are those identified as significantly overrepresented among the upregulated genes either in E or in M relative to the other female (Table A2, marked with*).
Table S13. Clusters of enriched functional annotation terms (DAVID) for all the differentially expressed genes upregulated in E females relative to M females.
Table S14. Clusters of enriched functional annotation terms (DAVID) for all the differentially expressed genes upregulated in M females relative to E females.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.