Can novel genetic analyses help to identify low-dispersal marine invasive species?

Authors

  • Peter R. Teske,

    1. Molecular Ecology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
    2. Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jonathan Sandoval-Castillo,

    1. Molecular Ecology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jonathan M. Waters,

    1. Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Luciano B. Beheregaray

    Corresponding author
    1. Molecular Ecology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
    • Correspondence

      Luciano B. Beheregaray

      Molecular Ecology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.

      Tel: +61 8 8201 5243; Fax: +61 8 8201 3015; E-mail: Luciano.beheregaray@flinders.edu.au

    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Genetic methods can be a powerful tool to resolve the native versus introduced status of populations whose taxonomy and biogeography are poorly understood. The genetic study of introduced species is presently dominated by analyses that identify signatures of recent colonization by means of summary statistics. Unfortunately, such approaches cannot be used in low-dispersal species, in which recently established populations originating from elsewhere in the species' native range also experience periods of low population size because they are founded by few individuals. We tested whether coalescent-based molecular analyses that provide detailed information about demographic history supported the hypothesis that a sea squirt whose distribution is centered on Tasmania was recently introduced to mainland Australia and New Zealand through human activities. Methods comparing trends in population size (Bayesian Skyline Plots and Approximate Bayesian Computation) were no more informative than summary statistics, likely because of recent intra-Tasmanian dispersal. However, IMa2 estimates of divergence between putatively native and introduced populations provided information at a temporal scale suitable to differentiate between recent (potentially anthropogenic) introductions and ancient divergence, and indicated that all three non-Tasmanian populations were founded during the period of European settlement. While this approach can be affected by inaccurate molecular dating, it has considerable (albeit largely unexplored) potential to corroborate nongenetic information in species with limited dispersal capabilities.

Ancillary