SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Akima, H. 1970. A new method of interpolation and smooth curve fitting based on local procedures. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 17:589602.
  • Akima, H., A. Gebhardt, T. Petzoldt, and M. Maechler. 2006. akima: Interpolation of irregularly spaced data. R package version 0.5-1. Available via http://CRAN. R-project. org/package= akima.
  • Amlou, M., B. Moreteau, and J. R. David. 1998. Genetic analysis of Drosophila sechellia specialization: oviposition behavior toward the major aliphatic acids of its host plant. Behav. Genet. 28:455464.
  • Arnold, M. L. 2006. Evolution through genetic exchange. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
  • Berglund, A. 1995. Many mates make male pipefish choosy. Behaviour 132:213218.
  • Borgia, G. 1981. Mate selection in the fly Scatophaga stercoraria: female choice in a male-controlled system. Anim. Behav. 29:7180.
  • Bosch, M., and N. M. Waser. 1999. Effects of local density on pollination and reproduction in Delphinium nuttallianum and Aconitum columbianum (Ranunculaceae). Am. J. Bot. 86:871879.
  • Bosch, M., and N. M. Waser. 2001. Experimental manipulation of plant density and its effect on pollination and reproduction of two confamilial montane herbs. Oecologia 126:7683.
  • Burla, H. 1954. Zur kenntnis der Drosophiliden der Elfenbeinkuste (Franzosisch West-Afrika). Rev. Suisse Zool. 61:1218.
  • Cabot, E. L., A. W. Davis, N. A. Johnson, and C.-I. Wu. 1994. Genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: complex epistasis underlying hybrid male sterility. Genetics 137:175189.
  • Campbell, D. R., and K. J. Halama. 1993. Resource and pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. Ecology 74:10431051.
  • Campbell, D. R., and N. M. Waser. 1989. Variation in pollen flow within and among populations of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 43:14441455.
  • Correa, C., and M. Thiel. 2003. Population structure and operational sex ratio in the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). J. Crustac. Biol. 23:849861.
  • Coyne, J. A. 1992. Genetics of sexual isolation in females of the Drosophila simulans species complex. Genet. Res. 60:2531.
  • Coyne, J. A. 1996. Genetics of a difference in male cuticular hydrocarbons between two sibling species, Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics 143:16891698.
  • Coyne, J. A., and E. Beecharn. 1987. Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 117:727737.
  • Coyne, J. A., and M. Kreitman. 1986. Evolutionary genetics of two sibling species, Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Evolution 40:673691.
  • Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. P. 545 in Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Coyne, J. A., J. Rux, and J. R. David. 1991. Genetics of morphological differences and hybrid sterility between Drosophila sechellia and its relatives. Genet. Res. 57:113122.
  • Coyne, J. A., S. Y. Kim, A. S. Chang, D. Lachaise, and S. Elwyn. 2002. Sexual isolation between two sibling species with overlapping ranges: Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba. Evolution 56:24242434.
  • Coyne, J. A., S. Elwyn, and E. Rolán-Alvarez. 2005. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data. Evolution 59:25882601.
  • David, J. R., F. Lemeunier, L. Tsacas, and A. Yassin. 2007. The historical discovery of the nine species in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Genetics 177:19691973.
  • Fang, S., R. Yukilevich, Y. Chen, D. A. Turissini, K. Zeng, I. A. Boussy, et al. 2012. Incompatibility and competitive exclusion of genomic segments between sibling Drosophila species. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002795.
  • Garrigan, D., S. B. Kingan, A. J. Geneva, P. Andolfatto, A. G. Clark, K. Thornton, et al. 2012. Genome sequencing reveals complex speciation in the Drosophila simulans clade. Genome Res. 22:14991511.
  • Harper, J. P., and S. L. Paulson. 1994. Reproductive isolation between Florida strains of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 10:8892.
  • Hedrick, P. W. 2013. Adaptive introgression in animals: examples and comparison to new mutation and standing variation as sources of adaptive variation. Mol. Ecol. 22:46064618.
  • Heiberger, R. M. 2009. HH: statistical analysis and data display: Heiberger and Holland. R package version, 2-1. Available via http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=HH.
  • Hirotani, A. 1994. Dominance rank, copulatory behaviour and estimated reproductive success in male reindeer. Anim. Behav. 48:929936.
  • Hollocher, H., and C.-I. Wu. 1996. The genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: X vs. autosomal effects and male vs. female effects. Genetics 143:12431255.
  • Howard, R. D., R. S. Moorman, and H. H. Whiteman. 1997. Differential effects of mate competition and mate choice on eastern tiger salamanders. Anim. Behav. 53:13451356.
  • Howard, R. D., R. S. Martens, S. A. Innis, J. M. Drnevich, and J. Hale. 1998. Mate choice and mate competition influence male body size in Japanese medaka. Anim. Behav. 55:11511163.
  • Kaneshiro, K. Y. 1980. Sexual isolation, speciation and the direction of evolution. Evolution 34:437444.
  • Kirkpatrick, M., and V. Ravigné. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159:S22S35.
  • Kliman, R. M., P. Andolfatto, J. A. Coyne, F. Depaulis, M. Kreitman, A. J. Berry, et al. 2000. The population genetics of the origin and divergence of the Drosophila simulans complex species. Genetics 156:19131931.
  • Knowles, L. L., B. B. Hernandez, and T. A. Markow. 2004. Exploring the consequences of postmating-prezygotic interactions between the sexes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 271:S357S359.
  • Kohn, J. R., and N. M. Waser. 1985. The effect of Delphinium nelsonii pollen on seed set in Ipomopsis aggregata, a competitor for hummingbird pollination. Am. J. Bot. 72:11441148.
  • Kokko, H., and D. J. Rankin. 2006. Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 361:319334.
  • Lachaise, D., M. Harry, M. Solignac, F. Lemeunier, V. Bénassi, and M. L. Cariou. 2000. Evolutionary novelties in islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from São Tomé. Proc. Biol. Sci. 267:14871495.
  • Lachaise, D., M. L. Cariou, J. R. David, F. Lemeunier, L. Tsacas, and M. Ashburner. 1988. Historical biogeography of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Evol. Ecol. 22:159225.
  • Lesnoff, M., and R. Lancelot. 2012. aod: Analysis of overdispersed data. R package version 1.3. Available via http://cran.r-project.org/package=aod.
  • Llopart, A., D. Lachaise, and J. A. Coyne. 2005a. Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea. Genetics 171:197210.
  • Llopart, A., D. Lachaise, and J. A. Coyne. 2005b. An anomalous hybrid zone in Drosophila. Evolution 59:26022607.
  • Llopart, A., S. Elwyn, D. Lachaise, and J. A. Coyne. 2002. Genetics of a difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea. Evolution 56:22622277.
  • MacDonald, S. J., and D. B. Goldstein. 1999. A quantitative genetic analysis of male sexual traits distinguishing the sibling species Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics 153:16831699.
  • Matute, D. R. 2010. Reinforcement of Gametic Isolation in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000341.
  • Matute, D. R. 2013. The role of founder effects on the evolution of reproductive isolation. J. Evol. Biol. 26:22992311.
  • Matute, D. R., and J. F. Ayroles. 2014. Hybridization occurs between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia in the Seychelles archipelago. J. Evol. Biol. 27:10571068.
  • Matute, D. R., and J. A. Coyne. 2010. Intrinsic reproductive isolation between two sister species of Drosophila. Evolution 64:903920.
  • Matute, D. R., C. J. Novak, and J. A. Coyne. 2009. Thermal adaptation and extrinsic reproductive isolation in two species of Drosophila. Evolution 63:583594.
  • Mayr, E. 1942. P. 334in Systematics and the origin of species: from the viewpoint of a zoologist. Columbia Univ. Press. New York, NY.
  • McDermott, S. R., and R. M. Kliman. 2008. Estimation of isolation times of the island species in the Drosophila simulans complex from multilocus DNA sequence data. PLoS ONE 3:e2442.
  • Mitchell, R. J., R. J. Flanagan, B. J. Brown, N. M. Waser, and J. D. Karron. 2009. New frontiers in competition for pollination. Ann. Bot. 103:14031413.
  • Moehring, A. J., A. Llopart, S. Elwyn, J. A. Coyne, and T. F. Mackay. 2006. The genetic basis of postzygotic reproductive isolation between Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba due to hybrid male sterility. Genetics 173:225233.
  • Nosil, P. 2012. Degree of sympatry affects reinforcement in Drosophila. Evolution 67:868872.
  • O'Brien, R. M. 2007. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual. Quant. 41:673690.
  • Penteriani, V. 2003. Breeding density affects the honesty of bird vocal displays as possible indicators of male/territory quality. Ibis 145:E127E135.
  • Peterson, M. A., B. M. Honchak, S. E. Locke, T. E. Beeman, J. Mendoza, J. Green, et al. 2005. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone. Evolution 59:26392655.
  • Pfennig, K. S., and D. W. Pfennig. 2009. Character displacement: ecological and reproductive responses to a common evolutionary problem. Q. Rev. Biol. 84:253276.
  • Price, T. D. 2007. Speciation in birds. Roberts and Company, Woodbury, NY.
  • Price, M. V., and N. M. Waser. 1982. Experimental studies of pollen carryover: hummingbirds and Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 54:353358.
  • R Development Core Team. 2005. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: the R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. Available online athttp://www.R-project.org/
  • Rice, W. R., and E. E. Hostert. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47:16371653.
  • Ritchie, M. G. 2007. Sexual selection and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38:79102.
  • Rolán-Alvarez, E., and A. Caballero. 2000. Estimating sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequencies. Evolution 54:3036.
  • Safran, R. J., E. S. Scordato, L. B. Symes, R. L. Rodríguez, and T. C. Mendelson. 2013. Contributions of natural and sexual selection to the evolution of premating reproductive isolation: a research agenda. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28:643650.
  • Schumer, M., G. G. Rosenthal, and P. Andolfatto. 2014. How common is homoploid hybrid speciation?. Evolution, 68:15531560. doi: 10.1111/evo.12399.
  • Servedio, M. R., and M. A. F. Noor. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:339364.
  • Solignac, M., and M. Monnerot. 1986. Race formation, speciation, and introgression within Drosophila simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia inferred from mitochondrial DNA analysis. Evolution 40:531539.
  • Sprenger, D., R. Lange, and N. Anthes. 2011. Population density and group size effects on reproductive behavior in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. BMC Evol. Biol. 11:107.
  • Stine, R. A. 1995. Graphical interpretation of variance inflation factors. Am. Stat. 49:5356.
  • Thiel, M., and C. Correa. 2004. Female rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus mate in rapid succession up a male dominance hierarchy. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57:6268.
  • Ting, C. T., A. Takahashi, and C.-I. Wu. 2001. Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila: concurrent evolution at multiple loci. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98:67096713.
  • Tomaru, M., H. Yamada, and Y. Oguma. 2004. Female mate recognition and sexual isolation depending on courtship song in Drosophila sechellia and its siblings. Genes Genet. Syst. 79:145150.
  • Tsacas, L., and G. Bächli. 1981. Drosophila sechellia, N. Sp., huitième espèce du sous-groupe melanogaster des iles Seychelles (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Rev. Fr. Entomol. 3:146150.
  • Verzijden, M. N., Z. W. Culumber, and G. G. Rosenthal. 2012. Opposite effects of learning cause asymmetric mate preferences in hybridizing species. Behav. Ecol. 23:11331139.
  • Volpe, E. P. 1955. Intensity of reproductive isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Bufo americanus and Bufo fowleri. Am. Nat. 89:303317.
  • Waage, J. K. 1979. Dual function of the damselfly penis—sperm removal and transfer. Science 203:916918.
  • Webster, M. S., and S. K. Robinson. 1999. Courtship disruptions and male mating strategies: examples from female-defense mating systems. Am. Nat. 154:717729.
  • Willis, P. M., M. J. Ryan, and G. G. Rosenthal. 2011. Encounter rates with conspecific males influence female mate choice in a naturally hybridizing fish. Behav. Ecol. 22:12341240.
  • Willis, P. M., G. G. Rosenthal, and M. J. Ryan. 2012. An indirect cue of predation risk counteracts female preference for conspecifics in a naturally hybridizing fish Xiphophorus birchmanni. PLoS ONE 7:e34802.
  • Wilson, D. S., and A. Hedrick. 1982. Speciation and the economics of mate choice. Evol. Theory 6:1524.
  • Wong, B., and U. Candolin. 2005. How is female mate choice affected by male competition? Biol. Rev. 80:559571.