ece3305-sup-0001-FigureS1.docxWord document280KFigure S1. Scheme of the poplar plantation used for the field trial (A) and photo of a typical soil core (B).
ece3305-sup-0002-FigureS2.docxWord document2552KFigure S2. Rarefaction curves of (A) soil, (B) root, (C) ECM root tip, and (D) combined samples.
ece3305-sup-0003-FigureS3.docxWord document54KFigure S3. Detected genera richness per fungal families clustered along their presence in soil and root samples.
ece3305-sup-0004-TableS1.docxWord document26KTable S1. Relative abundance (mean ± SD) of the 198 fungal families detected by 454 pyrosequencing analysis in soil and root samples.
ece3305-sup-0005-TableS2.docxWord document22KTable S2. List of fungal families used for cluster analyses (see Fig. 3).
ece3305-sup-0006-TableS3.docxWord document93KTable S3. Fungal species were classified into different groups according to their ecological lifestyles. Literature source is indicated.
ece3305-sup-0007-TableS4.docxWord document18KTable S4. Fungal species detected on ECM root tips of poplar plants by morphotyping/ITS-sequencing.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.