SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Amos, W., and A. R. Hoelzel. 1991. Long-term preservation of whale skin for DNA analysis. Rep. Int. Whaling Comm. (Special Issue) 13:99103.
  • Bandelt, H. J., P. Forster, and A. Rohl. 1999. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:3748.
  • Barclay, E. N. 1934. The variation of British roe deer. Proceedings of Zoological Society London, 709716.
  • Belkhir, K., P. Borsa, L. Chikhi, N. Raufaste, and F. Bonhomme. 2000. Genetix 4.02, logiciel sous WindowsTM pour la genetique des populations. Universite de Montpellier II, Montpellier.
  • Biebach, I., and L. F. Keller. 2009. A strong genetic footprint of the re-introduction history of Alpine ibex (Capra ibex ibex). Mol. Ecol. 18:50465058.
  • Bonnot, N., J. M. Gaillard, A. Coulon, M. Galan, J. F. Cosson, D. Delorme, et al. 2010. No difference between the sexes in fine-scale spatial genetic structure of roe deer. PLoS ONE 5:5.
  • Cargnelutti, B., D. Reby, L. Desneux, J. M. Angibault, J. Joachim, and A. J. M. Hewison. 2002. Space use by roe deer in a fragmented landscape some preliminary results. Rev. Ecol. Terre Vie 57:2937.
  • Coltman, D. W. 2008. Molecular ecological approaches to studying the evolutionary impact of selective harvesting in wildlife. Mol. Ecol. 17:221235.
  • Coulon, A., J. F. Cosson, J. M. Angibault, B. Cargnelutti, M. Galan, N. Morellet, et al. 2004. Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach. Mol. Ecol. 13:28412850.
  • Coulon, A., J. F. Cosson, N. Morellet, J. M. Angibault, B. Cargnelutti, M. Galan, et al. 2006a. Dispersal is not female biased in a resource-defence mating ungulate, the European roe deer. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 273:341348.
  • Coulon, A., G. Guillot, J. F. Cosson, J. M. A. Angibault, S. Aulagnier, B. Cargnelutti, et al. 2006b. Genetic structure is influenced by landscape features: empirical evidence from a roe deer population. Mol. Ecol. 15:16691679.
  • Crawford, A. M., K. G. Dodds, A. J. Ede, C. A. Pierson, G. W. Montgomery, H. G. Garmonsway, et al. 1995. An autosomal genetic linkage map of the sheep genome. Genetics 140:703724.
  • Creel, S. 2006. Recovery of the Florida panther – genetic rescue, demographic rescue, or both? Response to Pimm et al. (2006). Anim. Conserv. 9:125126.
  • Danilkin, A., and A. J. M. Hewison. 1996. Behavioural ecology of Siberian and European roe deer. Chapman and Hall, London.
  • DeYoung, R. W., S. Demarais, R. L. Honeycutt, A. P. Rooney, R. A. Gonzales, and K. L. Gee. 2003. Genetic consequences of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) restoration in Mississippi. Mol. Ecol. 12:32373252.
  • Dupanloup, I., S. Schneider, and L. Excoffier. 2002. A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Mol. Ecol. 11:25712581.
  • Evanno, G., S. Regnaut, and J. Goudet. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14:26112620.
  • Gaillard, J. M., A. J. M. Hewison, P. Kjellander, N. Pettorelli, C. Bonenfant, B. Van Moorter, et al. 2008. Population density and sex do not influence fine-scale natal dispersal in roe deer. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 275:20252030.
  • Galan, M., J. F. Cosson, S. Aulagnier, J. C. Maillard, S. Thevenon, and A. J. M. Hewison. 2003. Cross-amplification tests of ungulate primers in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) to develop a multiplex panel of 12 microsatellite loci. Mol. Ecol. Notes 3:142146.
  • Geist, V. 1998. Deer of the world: their evolution, behaviour and ecology. Swan Hill Press, Shrewsbury.
  • Gilpin, M. E., and M. E. Soul. 1986. Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. Pp. 1934 in M. E. Soul, ed. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Goudet, J. 2001. FSTAT: a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (Version 2.9.3.2). University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Guillot, G., F. Mortier, and A. Estoup. (2005). Geneland: a computer package for landscape genetics. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5:712715.
  • Guo, S. W., and E. A. Thompson. 1992. Performing the exact test of hardy-weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48:361372.
  • Haanes, H., K. H. Roed, A. Mysterud, R. Langvatn, and O. Rosef. 2010. Consequences for genetic diversity and population performance of introducing continental red deer into the northern distribution range. Conserv. Genet. 11:16531665.
  • Harris, S., P. Morris, S. Wray, and D. Yalden. 1995. A review of British mammals: population estimates and conservation status of British mammals other than cetaceans. JNCC, Peterborough.
  • Hewison, A. J. M. 1995. Isozyme variation in roe deer in relation to their population history in Britain. J. Zool. 235:279288.
  • Hewitt, G. M. 2000. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907913.
  • Hochkirch, A., K. A. Witzenberger, A. Teerling, and F. Niemeyer. 2007. Translocation of an endangered insect species, the field cricket (Gryllus campestris) in northern Germany. Biodivers. Conserv. 16:35973607.
  • Hulme, D. J., A. J. Smith, J. P. Silk, J. M. Redwin, and K. J. Beh. 1995. Polymorphic sheep microsatellites at the McM2, McM131, McM135, McM136, McM140, McM200, McM214, McM373, McM505, McM507 and McM512 loci. Anim. Genet. 26:369370.
  • Kuehn, R., H. Haller, W. Schroeder, and O. Rottmann. 2004. Genetic roots of the red deer (Cervus elaphus) population in eastern Switzerland. J. Hered. 95:136143.
  • Larkin, M. A., G. Blackshields, N. P. Brown, R. Chenna, P. A. McGettigan, H. McWilliam, et al. 2007. Clustal W and clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:29472948.
  • Latch, E. K., and O. E. Rhodes. 2005. The effects of gene flow and population isolation on the genetic structure of reintroduced wild turkey populations: are genetic signatures of source populations retained? Conserv. Genet. 6:981997.
  • Linnell, J., K. Wahlstrom, and J. Gaillard. 1998. From birth to independence: birth, growth, neonatal mortality, hiding behaviour and dispersal. Pp. 257283 in R. Andersen, P. Duncan, and J. Linnell, eds. The European roe deer: a portrait of a successful species. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, Norway.
  • Lorenzini, R., and S. Lovari. 2006. Genetic diversity and phylogeography of the European roe deer: the refuge area theory revisited. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 88:85100.
  • Lorenzini, R., S. Lovari, and M. Masseti. 2002. The rediscovery of the Italian roe deer: genetic differentiation and management implications. Ital. J. Zool. 69:367379.
  • Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Nei, M., and F. Tajima. 1981. DNA polymorphism detectable by restriction endonucleases. Genetics 97:145163.
  • Nussey, D. H., J. Pemberton, A. Donald, and L. E. B. Kruuk. 2006. Genetic consequences of human management in an introduced island population of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Heredity 97:5665.
  • Phillips, S., N. Dandy, R. Gill, and D. C. MacMillan. 2010. Is legislation a barrier to the sustainable management of game species? A case study of wild deer in Britain. J. Environ. Planning Manage. 52:9931012.
  • Pimm, S. L., L. Dollar, and O. L. Bass. 2006. The genetic rescue of the Florida panther. Anim. Conserv. 9:115122.
  • Prior, R. 1995. The roe deer – conservation of a native species. Swan-Hill Press, Shrewsbury.
  • Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945959.
  • Prugnolle, F., and T. de Meeus. 2002. Inferring sex-biased dispersal from population genetic tools: a review. Heredity 88:161165.
  • Putman, R., and J. Langbein. 2003. The deer manager's companion: a guide to the management of deer in the wild and in parks. Swan-Hill Press, Shrewsbury.
  • Ralls, K., J. D. Ballou, B. A. Rideout, and R. Frankham. 2000. Genetic management of chondrodystrophy in California condors. Anim. Conserv. 3:145153, Part 2.
  • Randi, E., M. Pierpaoli, and A. Danilkin. 1998. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in populations of Siberian and European roe deer (Capreolus pygargus and Capreolus capreolus). Heredity 80:429437.
  • Randi, E., P. C. Alves, J. Carranza, S. Milosevic-Zlatanovic, A. Sfougaris, and N. Mucci. 2004. Phylogeography of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) populations: the effects of historical genetic subdivisions and recent nonequilibrium dynamics. Mol. Ecol. 13:30713083.
  • Raymond, M., and F. Rousset. 1995. GENEPOP (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86:248249.
  • Rhymer, J. M., and D. Simberloff. 1996. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:83109.
  • Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223225.
  • Ritson, G. 1933. The roe deer in Cumberland. Natural History Society, Carlisle.
  • Roed, K. H. 1998. Microsatellite variation in Scandinavian Cervidae using primers derived from Bovidae. Hereditas 129:1925.
  • Royo, L. J., G. Pajares, I. Alvarez, I. Fernandez, and F. Goyache. 2007. Genetic variability and differentiation in Spanish roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): a phylogeographic reassessment within the European framework. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 42:4761.
  • Rozas, J., J. C. Sanchez-DelBarrio, X. Messeguer, and R. Rozas. 2003. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19:24962497.
  • San Jose, C., and S. Lovari. 1998. Ranging movements of female roe deer: do home-loving does roam to mate? Ethology 104:721728.
  • Schneider, S., D. Roessli, and L. Excoffier. 2000. Arlequin ver 2.000: a software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Lab, Dept. of Anthropology, University of Geneva, Geneva.
  • She, J. X., M. Autem, G. Kotulas, N. Pasteur, and F. Bonhomme. 1987. Multivariate analysis of genetic exchanges between Solea aegyptiaca and Solea senegalensis (Telosts, Soleidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 32:357371.
  • Taylor, W. L. 1948. The distribution of wild deer in England and Wales. J. Anim. Ecol. 17:151164.
  • Thulin, C. G. 2006. Microsatellite investigation of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Scandinavia reveals genetic differentiation of a Baltic Sea Island population. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 52:228235.
  • Van Oosterhout, C., W. F. Hutchinson, D. P. M. Wills, and P. Shipley. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4:535538.
  • Vernesi, C., E. Pecchioli, D. Caramelli, R. Tiedemann, E. Randi, and G. Bertorelle. 2002. The genetic structure of natural and reintroduced roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) populations in the Alps and central Italy, with reference to the mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of Europe. Mol. Ecol. 11:12851297.
  • Wang, M., and A. Schreiber. 2001. The impact of habitat fragmentation and social structure on the population genetics of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Central Europe. Heredity 86:703715.
  • Ward, A. I. 2005. Expanding ranges of wild and feral deer in Great Britain. Mamm. Rev. 35:165173.
  • Weir, B. S., and C. C. Cockerham. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:13581370.
  • Whitehead, G. K. 1964. The deer of Great Britain and Ireland. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
  • Wilson, G. A., C. Strobeck, L. Wu, and J. W. Coffin. 1997. Characterization of microsatellite loci in caribou Rangifer tarandus, and their use in other artiodactyls. Mol. Ecol. 6:697699.
  • Yalden, D. W. 1999. The history of British mammals. Poyser, London.
  • Zachos, F. E., S. S. Hmwe, and G. B. Hartl. 2006. Biochemical and DNA markers yield strikingly different results regarding variability and differentiation of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus, Artiodactyla: Cervidae) populations from northern Germany. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 44:167174.
  • Zenger, K. R., B. J. Richardson, and A. M. Vachot-Griffin. 2003. A rapid population expansion retains genetic diversity within European rabbits in Australia. Mol. Ecol. 12:789794.