SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, R. A., and L. J. Vitt. 1990. Sexual selection versus alternative causes of sexual dimorphism in teiid lizards. Oecologia 84:145157.
  • Badyaev, A. V. 2002. Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:369378.
  • Bateman, P. W., and P. A. Fleming. 2009. To cut a long tail short: a review of lizard caudal autotomy studies carried out over the last 20 years. J. Zool. 277:114.
  • Bolnick, D. I., and M. Doebeli. 2003. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution 57:24332449.
  • Butler, M. A., T. W. Schoener, and J. B. Losos. 2000. The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis Lizards. Evolution 54:259272.
  • Calsbeek, R., and R. M. Cox. 2010. Experimentally assessing the relative importance of predation and competition as agents of selection. Nature 465:613616.
  • Carothers, J. H. 1984. Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in some herbivorous lizards. Am. Nat. 124:244254.
  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and L. J. Vitt. 1989. Sexual dimorphism of head and body size in an iguanid lizard: paradoxical results. Am. Nat. 133:729735.
  • Corl, A., A. R. Davis, S. R. Kuchta, T. Comendant, and B. Sinervo. 2010. Alternative mating strategies and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana: a population-level comparative analysis. Evolution 64:7996.
  • Cox, R. M., S. L. Kelly, and H. B. John-Alder. 2003. A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Evolution 57:16531669.
  • Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Appleton Publishing Company, New York.
  • Denoël, M., A. Ivanović, G. Džukić, and M. L. Kalezić. 2009. Sexual size dimorphism in the evolutionary context of facultative paedomorphosis: insights from European newts. BMC Evol. Biol. 9:278.
  • Dubey, S., M. Chevalley, and R. Shine. 2011. Sexual dimorphism and sexual selection in a montane scincid lizard (Eulamprus leuraensis). Austral. Ecol. 36:6875.
  • Fairbairn, D. J. 2007. Introduction: the enigma of sexual size dimorphism. Pp. 110 in D. J. Fairbairn, W. U. Blanckenhorn and T. Székely, eds. Sex, size, and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Fleming, I. A., and M. R. Gross. 1994. Breeding competition in a pacific salmon (Coho: Oncorhyncus kisutch): measures of natural and sexual selection. Soc. Study Evol. 48:637657.
  • Good, D. A. 1988. Phylogenetic relationships among gerrhonotine lizards: an analysis of external morphology. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 121:1139.
  • Guillette, L. J., Jr., and G. Casas-Andreu. 1987. The reproductive biology of the high elevation Mexican lizard Barisia imbricata. Herpetologica 43:2938.
  • Guillette, L. J., Jr., and H. M. Smith. 1982. A review of the Mexican lizard Barisia imbricata, and the description of a new subspecies. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. 85:1333.
  • Herrel, A., L. Spithoven, R. Van Damme, and F. de Vree. 1999. Sexual dimorphism of head size in Gallotia galloti: testing the niche divergence hypothesis by functional analyses. Funct. Ecol. 13:289297.
  • Herrel, A., J. A. Moore, E. M. Bredeweg, and N. J. Nelson. 2010. Sexual dimorphism, body size, bite force and male mating success in tuatara. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 100:287292.
  • Honěk, A. 1993. Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66:483492.
  • Husak, J. F., A. K. Lappin, and R. A. Van Den Bussche. 2009. The fitness advantage of a high-performance weapon. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 96:840845.
  • Jaksic, F., and H. Greene. 1984. Empirical evidence of noncorrelation between tail loss frequency and predation intensity on lizards. Oikos 42:407411.
  • Ji, X., L. H. Lin, C. X. Lin, Q. B. Qiu, and Y. Du. 2006. Sexual dimorphism and female reproduction in the many-lined sun skink (Mabuya multifasciata) from China. J. Herpetol 40:351357.
  • Kaliontzopoulou, A., D. C. Adams, A. van der Meidjen, A. Perera, and M. A. Carretero. 2012. Relationships between head morphology, bite performance and ecology in two species of Podarcis wall lizards. Evol. Ecol. 26:825845.
  • Mank, J. E., K. Nam, B. Brunström, and H. Ellegren. 2010. Ontogenetic complexity of sexual dimorphism and sex-specific selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:15701578.
  • Martín, J., and A. Salvador. 1993. Tail loss reduces mating success in the Iberian rock-lizard, Lacerta monticola. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32:185189.
  • Perry, G. 1996. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the lizard Anolis polylepsis (Iguania): evidence from intraspecific variation in foraging behavior and diet. Can. J. Zool. 74:12381245.
  • Pianka, E. R., and L. J. Vitt. 2003. Lizards: windows to the evolution of diversity. University of California Press, Berkeley.
  • Pincheira-Donoso, D., and T. Tregenza. 2011. Fecundity selection and the evolution of reproductive output and sex-specific body size in the Liolaemus lizard adaptive radiation. Evol. Biol. 38:197207.
  • Ralls, K. 1977. Sexual dimorphism in mammals: avian models and unanswered questions. Am. Nat. 111:917938.
  • Shine, R. 1989. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Q. Rev. Biol. 64:419461.
  • Sinervo, B., and C. M. Lively. 1996. The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative mate strategies. Nature 380:240243.
  • Tihen, J. A. 1949. A review of the lizard genus Barisia. Univ. Kansas Bull. 33:217254.
  • Tokarz, R. R. 1995. Mate choice in lizards: a review. Herpetol. Monogr. 9:1740.
  • Vanhooydonck, B., F. B. Cruz, C. S. Abdala, D. L. M. Azocar, M. F. Bonino, and A. Herrel. 2010. Sex-specific evolution of bite performance in Liolaemus lizards (Iguania: Liolaemidae): the battle of the sexes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 101:461475.
  • Vial, J. L., and J. R. Stewart. 1989. The manifestation and significance of sexual size dimorphism in anguid lizards: a case study of Barisia monticola. Can. J. Zool. 67:6872.
  • Vincent, S. E., and A. Herrel. 2007. Functional and ecological correlated of ecologically-based dimorphisms in squamate reptiles. Integr. Comp. Biol. 47:172188.
  • Vitt, L., J. Congdon, A. Hulse, and J. Platz. 1974. Territorial aggressive encounters and tail breaks in the lizard Sceloporus magister. Copeia 1974:990993.
  • Weiss, S. L., E. A. Kennedy, and J. A. Bernhard. 2009. Female-specific ornamentation predicts offspring quality in the striped plateau lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Behav. Ecol. 20:10631071.
  • Whiting, M. J., J. K. Webb, and J. S. Keogh. 2009. Flat lizard female mimics use sexual deception in visual but not chemical signals. Proc. R Soc. B 276:15851591.
  • Wicknick, J. A. 1990. Intraspecific agonistic behavior of three species of alligator lizards (Sauria: Anguidae). M.Sc. Thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.
  • Zaldivar-Riverón, A., A. Nieto-Montes de Oca, and J. P. Laclette. 2005. Phylogeny and evolution of dorsal pattern in the Mexican endemic lizard genus Barisia (Anguidae: Gerrhonotinae). J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 43:243257.