SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barrett, S. C. H., and J. D. Thomson. 1982. Spatial pattern, floral sex-ratios, and fecundity in dioecious Aralia nudicaulis (Araliaceae). Can. J. Bot. 60:16621670.
  • Barrett, S. C. H., S. B. Yakimowski, D. L. Field, and M. Pickup. 2010. Ecological genetics of sex ratios in plant populations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B Biol. Sci. 365:25492557.
  • Carroll, S. B., and D. L. Mulcahy. 1993. Progeny sex ratios in dioecious Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80:551556.
  • Charlesworth, D. 2002. Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes. Heredity 88:94101.
  • Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth. 2000. The degeneration of Y chromosomes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B Biol. Sci. 355:15631572.
  • Conn, J. S., and U. Blum. 1981. Sex ratio of Rumex hastatulus: the effect of environmental factors and certation. Evolution 35:11081116.
  • Correns, C. 1922. Sex determination and numerical proportion of genders in common sorrel (Rumex acetosa) (translated from German). Biologisches Zentralblatt 42:465480.
  • Delph, L. F. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in life history. Pp. 149174 in M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson and L. F. Delph, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Edwards, A. W. F. 2000. Carl Düsing (1884) on the regulation of the sex-ratio. Theor. Popul. Biol. 58:255257.
  • Eppley, S. M. 2005. Spatial segregation of the sexes and nutrients affect reproductive success in a dioecious wind-pollinated grass. Plant Ecol. 181:179190.
  • Eppley, S. M., M. L. Stanton, and R. K. Grosberg. 1998. Intrapopulation sex ratio variation in the salt grass Distichlis spicata. Am. Nat. 152:659670.
  • Field, D. L., M. Pickup, and S. C. H. Barrett. 2012a. Comparative analyses of sex-ratio variation in dioecious flowering plants. Evolution. doi:10.1111/evo.12001
  • Field, D. L., M. Pickup, and S. C. H. Barrett. 2012b. The influence of pollination intensity on fertilization success, progeny sex ratio, and fitness in a wind-pollinated, dioecious plant. Int. J. Plant Sci. 173:184191.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Gleaves, J. T. 1973. Gene flow mediated by wind-borne pollen. Heredity 31:355366.
  • Hardy, I. C. W. 2002. Sex ratios: concepts and research methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Jaenike, J. 2001. Sex chromosome meiotic drive. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32:2549.
  • de Jong, T. J., and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 2005. Evolutionary ecology of plant reproductive strategies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Korpelainen, H. 2002. A genetic method to resolve gender complements investigations on sex ratios in Rumex acetosa. Mol. Ecol. 11:21512156.
  • Levin, D. A., and H. Kerster. 1974. Gene flow in seed plants. Evol. Biol. 7:139220.
  • Lloyd, D. G. 1974. Female-predominant sex ratios in angiosperms. Heredity 32:3544.
  • Onyekwelu, S. S., and J. L. Harper. 1979. Sex ratio and niche differentiation in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Nature 282:609611.
  • Renner, S. S., and R. E. Ricklefs. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Am. J. Bot. 82:596606.
  • R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available at http://www.R-project.org/.
  • Rychlewski, J., and K. Zarzycki. 1975. Sex ratio in seeds of Rumex acetosa L. as a result of sparse or abundant pollination. Acta Biol. Cracov. Ser. Bot. 18:101114.
  • Rychlewski, J., and K. Zarzycki. 1986. Genetical and ecological mechanisms regulating the sex ratio in populations of Rumex thyrsiflorus Fingerh. (Polygonaceae). Veröffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes ETH 87:132140.
  • Shelton, A. O. 2010. The origin of female-biased sex ratios in intertidal seagrasses (Phyllospadix spp.). Ecology 91:13801390.
  • Sinclair, J. P., J. Emlen, and D. C. Freeman. 2012. Biased sex ratios in plants: theory and trends. Bot. Rev. 78:6386.
  • Smith, B. W. 1963. Mechanism of sex determination in Rumex hastatulus. Genetics 48:12651288.
  • Sokal, R., and F. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman, New York.
  • Stehlik, I., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2005. Mechanisms governing sex-ratio variation in dioecious Rumex nivalis. Evolution 59:814825.
  • Stehlik, I., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2006. Pollination intensity influences sex ratios in dioecious Rumex nivalis, a wind-pollinated plant. Evolution 60:12071214.
  • Stehlik, I., P. Kron, S. C. H. Barrett, and B. C. Husband. 2007. Sexing pollen reveals female bias in a dioecious plant. New Phytol. 175:185194.
  • Stehlik, I., J. Friedman, and S. C. H. Barrett. 2008. Environmental influence on primary sex ratio in a dioecious plant. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105:1084710852.
  • Steven, J. C., and D. M. Waller. 2007. Isolation affects reproductive success in low-density but not high-density populations of two wind-pollinated Thalictrum species. Plant Ecol. 190:131141.
  • Taylor, D. R. 1999. Genetics of sex ratio variation among natural populations of a dioecious plant. Evolution 53:5562.
  • Taylor, D. R., M. J. Saur, and E. Adams. 1999. Pollen performance and sex-ratio evolution in a dioecious plant. Evolution 53:10281036.
  • Vyskot, B., and R. Hobza. 2004. Gender in plants: sex chromosomes are emerging from the fog. Trends Genet. 20:432438.