SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arnqvist, G., and T. Nilsson. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60:145164.
  • Baker, R. H., and G. S. Wilkinson. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of sexual dimorphism and eye-span allometry in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Evolution 55:13731385.
  • Baker, R. H., R. I. S. Ashwell, T. A. Richards, K. Fowler, T. Chapman, and A. Pomiankowski. 2001. Effects of multiple mating and male eye span on female reproductive output in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Behav. Ecol. 12:732739.
  • Baker, R. H., M. Denniff, P. Futerman, K. Fowler, A. Pomiankowski, and T. Chapman. 2003. Accessory gland size influences time to sexual maturity and mating frequency in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Behav. Ecol. 14:607611.
  • Bellamy, L., N. Chapman, K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski. 2013. Sexual traits are sensitive to genetic stress and predict extinction risk in the stalk-eyed fly, Diasemopsis meigenii. Evolution. In press.
  • Bjorksten, T. A., A. Pomiankowski, and K. Fowler. 2001. Temperature shock during development fails to increase the fluctuating asymmetry of a sexual trait in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:15031510.
  • Bretman, A., C. Fricke, P. Hetherington, R. Stone, and T. Chapman. 2010. Exposure to rivals and plastic responses to sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Ecol. 21:317321.
  • Burkhardt, D., and I. de la Motte. 1988. Big antlers are favoured – female choice in stalk-eyed flies (Diptera, Insecta), field collected harems and laboratory experiments. J. Comp. Physiol. A Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 162:649652.
  • Chapman, T. 2001. Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila. Heredity 87:511521.
  • Chapman, T., L. F. Liddle, J. M. Kalb, M. F. Wolfner, and L. Partridge. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373:241244.
  • Cotton, S., K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski. 2004. Condition dependence of sexual ornament size and variation in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Evolution 58:10381046.
  • Cotton, S., D. W. Rogers, J. Small, A. Pomiankowski, and K. Fowler. 2006. Variation in preference for a male ornament is positively associated with female eyespan in the stalk-eyed fly Diasemopsis meigenii. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273:12871292.
  • Cotton, S., J. Small, R. Hashim, and A. Pomiankowski. 2010. Eyespan reflects reproductive quality in wild stalk-eyed flies. Evol. Ecol. 24:8395.
  • Crudgington, H. S., and M. T. Siva-Jothy. 2000. Genital damage, kicking and early death – the battle of the sexes takes a sinister turn in the bean weevil. Nature 407:855856.
  • David, P., A. Hingle, D. Greig, A. Rutherford, A. Pomiankowski, and K. Fowler. 1998. Male sexual ornament size but not asymmetry reflects condition in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:22112216.
  • Dewsbury, D. A. 1982. Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am. Nat. 119:601610.
  • Fry, C. L., and G. S. Wilkinson. 2004. Sperm survival in female stalk-eyed flies depends on seminal fluid and meiotic drive. Evolution 58:16221626.
  • Harley, E., K. Fowler, and S. Cotton. 2010. No detectable fertility benefit from a single additional mating in wild stalk-eyed flies. PLoS One 5:e14309.
  • Ingleby, F. C., Z. Lewis, and N. Wedell. 2010. Level of sperm competition promotes evolution of male ejaculate allocation patterns in a moth. Anim. Behav. 80:3743.
  • Iwasa, Y., and A. Pomiankowski. 1999. Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution. J. Theor. Biol. 200:97109.
  • Kotrba, M. 1996. Sperm transfer by spermatophore in Diptera: new results from the Diopsidae. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 117:305323.
  • Lupold, S., M. K. Manier, O. Ala-Honkola, J. M. Belote, and S. Pitnick. 2011. Male Drosophila melanogaster adjust ejaculate size based on female mating status, fecundity, and age. Behav. Ecol. 22:184191.
  • Martin, O. Y., and D. J. Hosken. 2002. Strategic ejaculation in the common dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Anim. Behav. 63:541546.
  • Moore, P. J., W. E. Harris, V. T. Montrose, D. Levin, and A. J. Moore. 2004. Constraints on evolution and postcopulatory sexual selection: trade-offs among ejaculate characteristics. Evolution 58:17731780.
  • Nakatsuru, K., and D. L. Kramer. 1982. Is sperm cheap? Limited male-fertility and female choice in the lemon tetra (pisces, characidae). Science 216:753755.
  • Parker, G. A. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in insects. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 45:525567.
  • Parker, G. A., L. W. Simmons, P. Stockley, D. M. McChristie, and E. L. Charnov. 1999. Optimal copula duration in yellow dung flies: effects of female size and egg content. Anim. Behav. 57:795805.
  • Pitnick, S., D. J. Hosken, and T. R. Birkhead. 2009. Sperm morphological diversity. Pp. 69149 in T. R. Birkhead, D. J. Hosken and S. Pitnick, eds. Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Elsevier, Oxford, U.K.
  • Pizzari, T., and G. A. Parker. 2009. Sperm competition and sperm phenotype. Pp. 207245 in T. R. Birkhead, D. J. Hosken and S. Pitnick, eds. Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Elsevier, Oxford, U.K.
  • Pizzari, T., P. Jensen, and C. K. Cornwallis. 2004. A novel test of the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis reveals independent components of fertility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:5158.
  • Preston, B. T., I. R. Stevenson, J. M. Pemberton, and K. Wilson. 2001. Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion – a waning success in siring counters a ram's high score in competition for ewes. Nature 409:681682.
  • Ridley, M. 1988. Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 63:509549.
  • Rogers, D. W., T. Chapman, K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski. 2005. Mating-induced reduction in accessory reproductive organ size in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. BMC Evol. Biol. 5:37.
  • Rogers, D. W., C. A. Grant, T. Chapman, A. Pomiankowski, and K. Fowler. 2006. The influence of male and female eyespan on fertility in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Anim. Behav. 72:13631369.
  • Rogers, D. W., M. Denniff, T. Chapman, K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski. 2008. Male sexual ornament size is positively associated with reproductive morphology and enhanced fertility in the stalk-eyed fly Teleopsis dalmanni. BMC Evol. Biol. 8:236.
  • Royer, L., and J. N. McNeil. 1993. Male investment in the European corn-borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) – impact on female longevity and reproductive performance. Funct. Ecol. 7:209215.
  • Sheldon, B. C. 1994. Male phenotype, fertility, and the pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 257:2530.
  • Small, J. 2009. Female preference and male competition in stalk-eyed flies. University College London, London.
  • Stutt, A. D., and M. T. Siva-Jothy. 2001. Traumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimex lectularius. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98:56835687.
  • Svensson, M. G. E., E. Marling, and J. Lofqvist. 1998. Mating behavior and reproductive potential in the turnip moth Agrotis segetum (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Insect Behav. 11:343359.
  • Tazzyman, S. J., T. Pizzari, R. M. Seymour, and A. Pomiankowski. 2009. The evolution of continuous variation in ejaculate expenditure strategy. Am. Nat. 174:E71E82.
  • Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Pp. 136179 in B. Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago.
  • Wedell, N., and P. A. Cook. 1999. Butterflies tailor their ejaculate in response to sperm competition risk and intensity. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 266:10331039.
  • Wedell, N., M. J. G. Gage, and G. A. Parker. 2002. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:313320.
  • Wilkinson, G. S., H. Kahler, and R. H. Baker. 1998. Evolution of female mating preferences in stalk-eyed flies. Behav. Ecol. 9:525533.