SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Baker, R. J., K. D. Makova, and R. K. Chesser. 1999. Microsatellites indicate a high frequency of multiple paternity in Apodemus (Rodentia). Mol. Ecol. 8:107111.
  • Birdsall, D. A., and D. Nash. 1973. Occurrence of successful multiple insemination of females in natural populations of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Evolution 27:106110.
  • Birkhead, T. R., and A. P. Møller. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, London.
  • Birkhead, T. R., J. G. Martinez, T. Burke, and D. P. Froman. 1999. Sperm mobility determines the outcome of serpm competition in the domestic fowl. Proc. Biol. Sci. 266:17591764.
  • Breed, W. G. 1983. Variation in sperm morphology in the Australian rodent genus, Pseudomys (Muridae). Cell Tissue Res. 229:611625.
  • Breed, W. G. 1990. Comparative studies on the timing of reporduction and foetal number in six species of Australian conilurine rodents (Muridae: Hydromyinae). J. Zool. 221:110.
  • Breed, W. G. 2004. The spermatozoon of Eurasian murine rodents: its morphological diversity and evolution. J. Morphol. 261:5269.
  • Breed, W. G., and M. Adams. 1992. Breeding systems of spinifix hopping mice (Notomys alexis) and plains rats (Pseudomys australis): a test for multiple paternity in the laboratory. Aust. J. Zool. 40:1320.
  • Breed, B., and F. Ford. 2007. Native mice and rats. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria.
  • Breed, W. G., and J. Taylor. 2000. Body mass, testes mass, and sperm size in murine rodents. J. Mammal. 81:758768.
  • Briskie, J. V., R. Montgomerie, and T. R. Birkhead. 1997. The evolution of sperm size in birds. Evolution 51:937945.
  • Byrne, P. G., L. W. Simmons, and J. D. Roberts. 2003. Sperm competition and the evolution of gamete morphology in frogs. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270:20792086.
  • Dobrinski, I., S. S. Suarez, and B. A. Ball. 1996. Intracellular concentration in equine spermatozoa attached to oviductal epithelial cells in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 54:783788.
  • Firman, R. C., and L. W. Simmons. 2009. Sperm competition and the evolution of the sperm hook in house mice. J. Evol. Biol. 22:25052511.
  • Firman, R. C., and L. W. Simmons. 2010. Experimental evolution of sperm quality via postcopulatory sexual selection in house mice. Evolution 64:12451256.
  • Firman, R. C., and L. W. Simmons. 2011. Experimental evolution of sperm competitiveness in a mammal. BMC Evol. Biol. 11:19.
  • Firman, R. C., L. Y. Cheam, and L. W. Simmons. 2011. Sperm competition does not influence sperm hook morphology in selection lines of house mice. J. Evol. Biol. 24:856862.
  • Firman, R. C., I. Klemme, and L. W. Simmons, 2013. Strategic adjustments in sperm production within and between two island populations of house mice. Evolution (in press).
  • Fisher, H. S., and H. E. Hoekstra. 2010. Competition drives cooperation among closely related sperm of deer mice. Nature 463:801803.
  • Fitzpatrick, J. L., R. Montgomerie, J. K. Desjardins, K. A. Stiver, N. Kolm, and S. Balshine. 2009. Female promiscuity promotes the evolution of faster sperm in cichlid fishes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:11281132.
  • Gage, M. J. G., C. P. Macfarlane, S. Yeates, R. G. Ward, J. B. Seare, and G. A. Parker. 2004. Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon: relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success. Curr. Biol. 14:4447.
  • Gasparini, C., L. W. Simmons, M. Beveridge, and J. P. Evans. 2010. Sperm swimming velocity predicts competitive fertilization success in the green swordtail Xiphophorus helleri. PLoS ONE 5:15.
  • Gomendio, M., and E. R. S. Roldan. 1991. Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals. Proc. Biol. Sci. 243:181185.
  • Gomendio, M., and E. R. Roldan. 1993. Coevolution between male ejaculates and female reproductive biology in eutherian mammals. Proc. Biol. Sci. 252:712.
  • Gomendio, M., J. Martin-Coello, C. Crespo, C. Magana, and E. R. S. Roldan. 2006. Sperm competition enhances functional capacity of mammalian spermatozoa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:1511315117.
  • Higginson, D., and S. Pitnick. 2011. Evolution of intra-ejaculate sperm interactions: do sperm cooperate? Biol. Rev. 86:249270.
  • Hosken, D. J., and P. I. Ward. 2001. Experimental evidence for testis size evolution via sperm competition. Ecol. Lett. 4:1013.
  • Hunter, F. M., and T. R. Birkhead. 2002. Sperm viability and sperm competition in insects. Curr. Biol. 12:121123.
  • Immler, S., H. D. M. Moore, W. G. Breed, and T. R. Birkhead. 2007. By hook or by crook? Morphometry, competition and cooperation in rodent sperm. PLoS ONE 1:e170.
  • Lefebvre, R., R. P. DeMott, S. S. Suarez, and J. C. Samper. 1995. Specific inhibition of equine sperm binding to oviduct epithelium. Biol. Reprod. Monogr. 1:689696.
  • Lüpold, S., S. Calhim, S. Immler, and T. R. Birkhead. 2009. Sperm morphology and sperm velocity in passerine birds. Proc. Biol. Sci. 276:11751181.
  • Moore, H., K. Dvorakova, N. Jenkins, and W. Breed. 2002. Exceptional sperm cooperation in the wood mouse. Nature 418:174177.
  • Moro, D., and P. B. S. Spencer. 2003. Microsatellite primers for the Western Pebble-mound Mouse (Pseudomys chapmani) that show cross amplification for other species of Australian rodent. Mol. Ecol. Notes 3:259261.
  • Parker, G. A. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45:525567.
  • Pizzari, T., and G. A. Parker. 2009. Sperm competition and the sperm phenotype. Pp. 205244 in T. R. Birkhead, D. J. Hosken, S. Pitnick, eds. Sperm biology, and evolutionary perspective. Elsevier, London.
  • Roldan, E. R. S., M. Gomendio, and A. D. Vitullo. 1992. The evolution of eutherian spermatozoa and underlying selective forces: female selection and sperm competition. Biol. Rev. 67:551593.
  • Rugh, R. 1968. The mouse: its reproduction and development. Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis.
  • Simmons, L. W. 2001. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Simmons, L. W., and F. García-González. 2008. Evolutionary reduction in testes size and competitive fertilisation success in response to the experimental removal of sexual selection in dung beetles. Evolution 62:25802591.
  • Smith, T. T., and R. Yanagimachi. 1990. The viability of hamster sperm stored in the isthmus of the oviduct: the importance of sperm-epithelium contact for sperm survival. Biol. Reprod. 42:450457.
  • Smith, T. T., and R. Yanagimachi. 1991. Attachment and release of spermatozoa from the caudal isthmus of the hamster oviduct. J. Reprod. Fertil. 91:567573.
  • Smith, J. R., C. H. S. Watts, and E. G. Crichton. 1972. Reproduction in the Australian desert rodents, Notomys alexis and Pseudomys australis. Aust. Mammal. 1:117.
  • Stockley, P., M. J. G. Gage, G. A. Parker, and A. P. Møller. 1997. Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics. Am. Nat. 149:933954.
  • Suarez, S. S. 1987. Sperm transport and motility in the mouse oviduct: observations in situ. Biol. Reprod. 36:203210.
  • Thomas, P. G. A., B. A. Ball, and S. P. Brinsko. 1995. Changes associated with induced capacitation influence the interaction between equine spermatozoa and oviduct epithelial cell monolayers. Biol. Reprod. Monogr. 1:697705.
  • Watts, C. H. S. 1979. Reproductive parameters of some Australian rodents. Aust. J. Zool. 20:305311.