Role of evolutionary and ecological factors in the reproductive success and the spatial genetic structure of the temperate gorgonian Paramuricea clavata
Article first published online: 8 MAY 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Ecology and Evolution
Volume 3, Issue 6, pages 1765–1779, June 2013
How to Cite
Ecology and Evolution 2013; 3(6): 1765–1779
- Issue published online: 12 JUN 2013
- Article first published online: 8 MAY 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 9 APR 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 8 APR 2013
- Manuscript Received: 13 MAR 2013
- French Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche
- MCI. Grant Number: CGL2010-18466
- CoCoNet. Grant Number: 287844
Table S1. Information about the examined colonies (N = 100): sex (M = male, F = female, I = Indeterminate); size (maximum height in cm); colonies' stage class for kinship relationship (C0 = <15 cm, C1 = 15–30 cm, C2 = 31–50 cm, C3 = >51 cm); estimated reproductive output [computed on the basis of the biometry and gonadal production of the colonies (Coma et al. 1995a,b, 1998)]; male reproductive success (i.e., the number of larvae that each male sired)
Table S2. (a) f estimator of FIS for the larval pool, the larval pool combined with parental population and all the colonies (in bold significant values after FDR); (b) null allele frequency per locus for all the colonies
Table S3. Multiple regression analysis to examine whether colony height (height) and male to female distance (distance) contributed to explain male reproductive success estimated with the surface brooding larvae of each distinct female colony (results from J4-1 and J4-2 were grouped as larvae belong to the same spawning). (a) Slopes (± SE) for the different variables, intercept (A), adjusted squared r (Adj R²). (b) Partial regression coefficients. Not significant (ns), ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05
Figure S1. Plot of LnP(D) as a function of the number of clusters (K) across the 20 runs.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.