SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adams, D. C., and J. O. Church. 2008. Amphibians do not follow Bergmann′s rule. Evolution 62:413420.
  • Adolph, S. C., and W. P. Porter. 1993. Temperature, activity, and lizard life-histories. Am. Nat. 142:273295.
  • Angilletta, M. J. 2009. Thermal adaptation: a theoretical and empirical synthesis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Angilletta, M. J., and A. E. Dunham. 2003. The temperature-size rule in ectotherms: simple evolutionary explanations may not be general. Am. Nat. 162:332342.
  • Arendt, J. D. 2011. Size-fecundity relationships, growth trajectories, and the temperature-size rule for ectotherms. Evolution 65:4351.
  • Arnett, A. E., and N. J. Gotelli. 1999. Bergmann′s rule in the ant lion Myrmeleon immaculatus (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae): geographic variation in body size and heterozygosity. J. Biogeogr. 26:275284.
  • Arrayago, M.-J., A. Bea, and B. Heulin. 1996. Hybridization experiment between oviparous and viviparous strains of Lacerta vivipara: a new insight into the evolution of viviparity in reptiles. Herpetologica 52:333342.
  • Arribas, O. J. 2009. Morphological variability of the Cantabro-Pyrenean populations of Zootoca vivipara (JACQUIN, 1787) with description of a new subspecies (Squamata: Sauria: Lacertidae). Herpetozoa 21:123146.
  • Arribas, O. J., and P. Galán. 2005. Reproductive characteristics of the Pyrenean high-mountain lizards: Iberolacerta aranica (Arribas, 1993), I. aurelioi (Arribas, 1994) and I. bonnali (Lantz, 1927). Anim. Biol. 55:163190.
  • Ashton, K. G. 2001. Body size variation among mainland populations of the western rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis). Evolution 55:25232533.
  • Ashton, K. G., and C. R. Feldman. 2003. Bergmann's rule in non-avian reptiles: turtles follow it, lizards and snakes reverse it. Evolution 57:11511163.
  • Atkinson, D. 1994. Temperature and organism size- a biological law for ectotherms? Adv. Ecol. Res. 25:158.
  • Avery, R. A. 1971. Estimates of food consumption by the lizard Lacerta vivipara Jacquin. J. Anim. Ecol. 40:351365.
  • Avery, R. A. 1975. Clutch size and reproductive effort in the lizard Lacerta vivipara Jacquin. Oecologia 19:165170.
  • Ballinger, R. E. 1977. Reproductive strategies: food availability as a source of proximal variation in a lizard. Ecology 58:628635.
  • Bauwens, D., and R. F. Verheyen. 1987. Variation of reproductive traits in a population of the lizard Lacerta vivipara. Holarct. Ecol. 10:120127.
  • Bauwens, D., B. Heulin, and T. Pilorge. 1986. Variations spatio-temporelles des caractéristiques démographiques dans et entre populations du lézard Lacerta vivipara. Pp. 531536 in CNRS, ed. Actes du colloque CNRS “Biologie des populations”. Lyon, France.
  • Bauwens, D., P. E. Hertz, and A. M. Castilla. 1996. Thermoregulation in a lacertid lizard: the relative contributions of distinct behavioral mechanisms. Ecology 77:18181830.
  • Bergmann, C. 1847. Über die Verhältnisse der wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Gottinger Studien 3:595708.
  • Berrigan, D., and E. L. Charnov. 1994. Reaction norms for age and size at maturity in response to temperature - a puzzle for life historians. Oikos 70:474478.
  • Bleu, J., J. F. Le Galliard, S. Meylan, M. Massot, and P. S. Fitze. 2011. Mating does not influence reproductive investment, in a viviparous lizard. J. Exp. Zool. A Ecol. Genet. Physiol. 315A:458464.
  • Blois, J. L., R. S. Feranec, and E. A. Hadly. 2008. Environmental influences on spatial and temporal patterns of body-size variation in California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi). J. Biogeogr. 35:602613.
  • Braña, F. 1986. Ciclo reproductor y oviparismo de Lacerta vivipara en la Cordillera Cantábrica. Rev. Españ. Herpetol. 1:275291.
  • Bulakhova, N. A, V. N. Kuranova, and S. V. Saveliev. 2007. Some demographic characteristics of lizards (Lacertidae, Squamata, Reptilia). Lacerta agilis and Zootoca vivipara populations of the south-east territories of Western Siberia. Vestnik Tomsk State Univ. Biol. Sci. J. 1:5066. [In Russian].
  • Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information –theoretic approach. 2nd Ed. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Castilla, A. M., R. Van Damme, and D. Bauwens. 1999. Field body temperatures, mechanisms of thermoregulation and evolution of thermal characteristics in lacertid lizards. Nat. Croat. 8:253274.
  • Cavin, L. 1993. Structure d'une population subalpine de Lézards vivipares (Lacerta vivipara Jacquin, 1787). Rev. Suisse Zool. 100:357371.
  • Crnobrnja-Isailović, J., and I. Aleksić. 2004. Clutch size in two Central Balkan populations of European common lizard Lacerta vivipara. Biota 5:510.
  • Cruz, F. B., L. A. Fitzgerald, R. E. Espinoza, and J. A. Schulte. 2005. The importance of phylogenetic scale in tests of Bergmann's and Rapoport's rules: lessons from a clade of South American lizards. J. Evol. Biol. 18:15591574.
  • Cushman, J. H., J. H. Lawton, and B. F. J. Manly. 1993. Latitudinal patterns in European ant assemblages: variation in species richness and body size. Oecologia 95:3037.
  • Cvetković, D., N. Tomašević, G. F. Ficetola, J. Crnobrnja-Isailović, and C. Miaud. 2009. Bergmann′s rule in amphibians: combining demographic and ecological parameters to explain body size variation among populations in the common toad Bufo bufo. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 47:171180.
  • Dely, O., and W. Böhme. 1984. Lacerta vivipara Jacquin 1787 – Waldeidechse. Pp. 362393 in W. Böhme, ed. Handbuch der Amphibien und Reptilien Europas, Band 2/I., Echsen II (Lacerta). Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden.
  • Dormann, C. F., J. M. McPherson, M. B. Araújo, R. Bivand, J. Bollinger, G. Carl, et al. 2007. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30:609628.
  • Dunham, A. E. 1982. Demographic and life-history variation among populations of the iguanid lizard Urosaurus ornatus: implications for the study of life-history phenomena in lizards. Herpetologica 38:208221.
  • Ekner, A., I. Majláth, V. Majláthová, M. Hromada, M. Bona, M. Antczak, et al. 2008. Densities and morphology of two co-existing lizard species (Lacerta agilis and Zootoca vivipara) in extensively used farmland in Poland. Folia Biol. (Krakow) 56:165171.
  • Ferguson, G. W., and L. G. Talent. 1993. Life-history traits of the lizard Sceloporus undulatus from two populations raised in a common laboratory environment. Oecologia 93:8894.
  • Ficetola, G. F., S. Scali, M. Denoël, G. Montinaro, T. D. Vukov, M. A. L. Zuffi, et al. 2010. Ecogeographical variation of body size in the newt Triturus carnifex: comparing hypotheses using an information-theoretic approach. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19:485495.
  • Freckleton, R. P., and W. Jetz. 2009. Space versus phylogeny: disentangling phylogenetic and spatial signals in comparative data. Proc. Biol. Sci. 276:2130.
  • Gelman, A. 2008. Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Stat. Med. 27:28652873.
  • Gotthard, K. 2001. Growth strategies of ectothermic animals in temperate environments. Pp. 287303 in D. Atkinson, M. Thorndyke, eds. Environment and animal development: genes, life histories, and plasticity. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford.
  • Graham, M. 2003. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84:28092815.
  • Grueber, C. E., S. Nakagawa, R. J. Laws, and I. G. Jamieson. 2012. Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions. J. Evol. Biol. 24:699711.
  • Guillaume, C. P., B. Heulin, and V. Beshkov. 1997. Biogeography of Lacerta (Zootoca) vivipara: reproductive mode and enzyme phenotypes in Bulgaria. Ecography 20:240246.
  • Guillaume, C. P., B. Heulin, I. Y. Pavlinov, D. V. Semenov, A. Bea, N. Vogrin, et al. 2006. Morphological variation in the common lizard Lacerta (Zootoca) vivipara. Russian J. Herpetol. 13:110.
  • Guindon, S., J. F. Dufayard, V. Lefort, M. Anisimova, W. Hordijk, and O. Gascuel. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59:307321.
  • Harvey, P. H., and M. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Hawkins, B. A., and J. A. F. Diniz-Filho. 2004. ‘Latitude’ and geographic patterns in species richness. Ecography 27:268272.
  • Heulin, B. 1985a. Démographie d'une population de Lacerta vivipara de basse altitude. Acta Oecol., Oecol. Generalis 6:261280.
  • Heulin, B. 1985b. Maturité sexuelle et âge à la première reproduction, dans une population de plaine du lézard vivipare. Can. J. Zool. 63:17731777.
  • Heulin, B. 1988. Données nouvelles sur les populations ovipares de Lacerta vivipara. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 306:6368.
  • Heulin, B., and C. Guillaume. 1989. Extension géographique des populations ovipares de Lacerta vivipara. Rev. Ecol. 44:3945.
  • Heulin, B., K. Osenegg, and M. Lebouvier. 1991. Timing of embryonic development and birth dates in oviparous and viviparous strains of Lacerta vivipara- testing the predictions of an evolutionary hypothesis. Acta Oecol. 12:517528.
  • Heulin, B., K. Osenegg, and D. Michel. 1994. Survie et incubation des oeufs dans deux populations ovipares de Lacerta vivipara. Amphibia-Reptilia 15:199219.
  • Heulin, B., K. Osenegg-Leconte, and D. Michel. 1997. Demography of bimodal reproductive species of lizard (Lacerta vivipara): survival and density characteristics of oviparous populations. Herpetologica 53:432444.
  • Hofmann, S., and K. Henle. 2006. Male reproductive success and intrasexual selection in the common lizard determined by DNA-microsatellites. J. Herpetol. 40:16.
  • Horváthová, T., M. Baláž, and D. Jandzik. 2013. Reproduction and morphology of the common lizard (Zootoca vivipara) from montane populations in Slovakia. Zoolog. Sci. 30:9298.
  • Jenkins, T. M. Jr., S. Diehl, K. W. Kratz, and S. D. Cooper. 1999. Effects of population density on individual growth of brown trout in streams. Ecology 80:941956.
  • Jetz, W., K. G. Ashton, and F. A. La Sorte. 2009. Phenotypic population divergence in terrestrial vertebrates at macro scales. Ecol. Lett. 12:11371146.
  • Kornacker, P. M. 1993. Populationsökologische Untersuchungen an einer Bahndamm-Population von Lacerta vivipara im Rheinland. Salamandra 29:97118.
  • Kozlowski, J., M. Czarnoleski, and M. Danko. 2004. Can optimal resource allocation models explain why ectotherms grow larger in cold? Integr. Comp. Biol. 44:480493.
  • Kratochvíl, L., M. Fokt, I. Rehák, and D. Frynta. 2003. Misinterpretation of character scaling: a tale of sexual dimorphism in body size of common lizards. Can. J. Zool. 81:11121117.
  • Lazareva, O. G. 2009. Ecology of lizard Lacerta vivipara inhabiting Komsomolskiy nature reserve. Samarskaia Luka, 18:7885. [In Russian].
  • Lindsey, C. C. 1966. Body sizes of poikilotherm vertebrates at different latitudes. Evolution 20:456465.
  • Lindtke, D., W. Mayer, and W. Böhme. 2010. Identification of a contact zone between oviparous and viviparous common lizards (Zootoca vivipara) in central Europe: reproductive strategies and natural hybridization. Salamandra 46:7382.
  • Liu, P., W. G. Zhao, Z. T. Liu, B. J. Dong, and H. Chen. 2008. Sexual dimorphism and female reproduction in Lacerta vivipara in northeast China. Asiat. Herpetol. Res. 11:98104.
  • Lorenzon, P., J. Clobert, and M. Massot. 2001. The contribution of phenotypic plasticity to adaptation in Lacerta vivipara. Evolution 55:392404.
  • Marquis, O., M. Massot, and J. F. Le Galliard. 2008. Intergenerational effects of climate generate cohort variation in lizard reproductive performance. Ecology 89:25752583.
  • Massot, M., J. Clobert, T. Pilorge, J. Lecomte, and R. Barbault. 1992. Density dependence in the common lizard - demographic consequences of a density manipulation. Ecology 73:17421756.
  • Mayer, W., W. Böhme, F. Tiedman, and W. Bischoff. 2000. On oviparous populations of Zootoca vivipara in south-eastern central Europe and their phylogenetic relationships to neighbouring viviparous and south-west European oviparous populations. Herpetozoa 13:5969.
  • Mazerolle, M. J. 2013. AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodelinference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 1.27. Available at http://cran.r-project.org/package=AICcmodavg in R (accessed April 10, 2013).
  • Meiri, S. 2011. Bergmann′s rule- what′s in a name? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20:203207.
  • Meiri, S., T. Dayan, and D. Simberloff. 2005. Biogeographical patterns in the Western Palearctic: the fasting-endurance hypothesis and the status of Murphy′s rule. J. Biogeogr. 32:369375.
  • Morrison, C., and J.-M. Hero. 2003. Geographic variation in life-history characteristics of amphibians: a review. J. Anim. Ecol. 72:270279.
  • Murphy, E. C. 1985. Bergmann′s rule, seasonality, and geographic variation in body size of house sparrows. Evolution 39:13271334.
  • Naya, D. E., M. A. Lardies, and F. Bozinovic. 2007. The effect of diet quality on physiological and life-history traits in the harvestman Pachylus paessleri. J. Insect Physiol. 53:132138.
  • Niewiarowski, P. H. 2001. Energy budgets, growth rates, and thermal constraints: toward an integrative approach to the study of life-history variation. Am. Nat. 157:421433.
  • Niewiarowski, P. H., M. J. Jr. Angilletta, and A. D. Leaché. 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis of life-history variation among populations of the lizard Sceloporus undulatus: an example and prognosis. Evolution 58:619633.
  • Olalla-Tárraga, M. Á. 2011. Nullius in Bergmann” or the pluralistic approach to ecogeographical rules: a reply to Watt et al. (2010). Oikos 120:14411444.
  • Olalla-Tárraga, M. Á., and M. Á. Rodríguez. 2007. Energy and interspecific body size patterns of amphibian faunas in Europe and North America: anurans follow Bergmann's rule, urodeles its converse. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16:606617.
  • Olalla-Tárraga, M. Á., M. Á. Rodríguez, and B. A. Hawkins. 2006. Broad-scale patterns of body size in squamate reptiles of Europe and North America. J. Biogeogr. 33:781793.
  • Orlova, V. F., V. N. Kuranova, and N. A. Bulakhova. 2005. Some aspects of reproductive biology of Zootoca vivipara (Jacquin, 1787) in the Asian part of its area. Pp. 201204 in N. Ananjeva, O. Tsinenko eds. Herpetologia Petropolitana. Societas Europaea Herpetologica, St. Petersburg.
  • Pagel, M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877884.
  • Partridge, L., B. Barrie, K. Fowler, and V. French. 1994. Evolution and development of body size and cell size in Drosophila melanogaster in response to temperature. Evolution 48:12691276.
  • Pilorge, T. 1982. Stratégie adaptative d'une population de montagne de Lacerta vivipara. Oikos 39:206212.
  • Pilorge, T. 1987. Density, size structure, and reproductive characteristics of three populations of Lacerta vivipara (Sauria: Lacertidae). Herpetologica 43:345356.
  • Pilorge, T., and F. Xavier. 1981. Le Lézard vivipare (Lacerta vivipara J.) dans la région du Puy-de-Dôme: écologie et stratégie de reproduction. Ann. Stn. Biol. Besse-en-Chandesse 15:3259.
  • Pilorge, T., F. Xavier, and R. Barbault. 1983. Variations in litter size and reproductive effort within and between some populations of Lacerta vivipara. Holarct. Ecol. 6:381386.
  • Pincheira-Donoso, D., D. J. Hodgson, and T. Tregenza. 2008. The evolution of body size under environmental gradients in ectotherms: why should Bergmann's rule apply to lizards? BMC Evol. Biol. 8:68.
  • Posada, D. 2008. JModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:12531256.
  • Qualls, C. P., and R. Shine. 1995. Maternal body-volume as a constraint on reproductive output in lizards: evidence from the evolution of viviparity. Oecologia 103:7378.
  • R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Roff, D. A. 1992. The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapmann and Hall, New York.
  • Roig, J. M., M. A. Carretero, and G. A. Llorente. 2000. Reproductive cycle in a Pyrenean oviparous population of the common lizard (Zootoca vivipara). Neth. J. Zool. 50:1527.
  • Rosenzweig, M. L. 1968. The strategy of body size in mammalian carnivores. Am. Midl. Nat. 80:299315.
  • Sanchis, V., J. M. Roig, M. A. Carretero, V. Roca, and G. A. Llorente. 2000. Host-parasite relationships of Zootoca vivipara in the Pyrenees (North Spain). Folia Parasitol. 47:118122.
  • Saveliev, S.S., N. A. Bulakhova, and V. N. Kuranova. 2006. Reproductive activity of Lacerta agilis and Zootoca vivipara (Reptilia: Sauria: Lacertidae) in western Siberia. Pp. 133137 in M. Vences, J. Köhler, T. Ziegler, W. Böhme eds. Herpetologia Bonnensis II. Proceedings of the 13th Congress of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica, Societas Europaea Herpetologica, Bonn.
  • Sears, M. W. 2005. Geographic variation in the life history of the sagebrush lizard: the role of thermal constraints on activity. Oecologia 143:2536.
  • Sears, M. W., and M. J. Angilletta. 2004. Body size clines in Sceloporus lizards: proximate mechanisms and demographic constraints. Integr. Comp. Biol. 44:433442.
  • Sorci, G., J. Clobert, and S. Belichon. 1996. Phenotypic plasticity of growth and survival in the common lizard Lacerta vivipara. J. Anim. Ecol. 65:781790.
  • Stewart, J. R., T. W. Ecay, and B. Heulin. 2009. Calcium provision to oviparous and viviparous embryos of the reproductively bimodal lizard Lacerta (Zootoca) vivipara. J. Exp. Biol. 212:25202524.
  • Strijbosch, H., and R. C. M. Creemers. 1988. Comparative demography of sympatric populations of Lacerta vivipara and Lacerta agilis. Oecologia 76:2026.
  • Surget-Groba, Y., B. Heulin, C.-P. Guillaume, R. S. Thorpe, L. Kupriyanova, N. Vogrin, et al. 2001. Intraspecific phylogeography of Lacerta vivipara and the evolution of viviparity. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18:449459.
  • Surget-Groba, Y., B. Heulin, C.-P. Guillaume, M. Puky, D. Semenov, V. Orlova, et al. 2006. Multiple origins of viviparity, or reversal from viviparity to oviparity? The European common lizard (Zootoca vivipara, Lacertidae) and the evolution of parity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 87:111.
  • Uller, T., and M. Olsson. 2003. Life in the land of the midnight sun: are northern lizards adapted to longer days? Oikos 101:317322.
  • Van Damme, R., D. Bauwens, and R. F. Verheyen. 1989. Effect of relative clutch mass on sprint speed in the lizard Lacerta vivipara. J. Herpetol. 23:459461.
  • Van Damme, R., D. Bauwens, and R. F. Verheyen. 1991. The thermal-dependence of feeding-behavior, food-consumption and gut-passage time in the lizard Lacerta vivipara Jacquin. Funct. Ecol. 5:507517.
  • Van Voorhies, W. A. 1996. Bergmann size clines: a simple explanation for their occurrence in ectotherm. Evolution 50:12591264.
  • Weetman, D., and D. Atkinson. 2004. Evaluation of alternative hypotheses to explain temperature-induced life history shifts in Daphnia. J. Plankton Res. 26:107116.
  • Werner, E. E., and B. R. Anholt. 1993. Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. Am. Nat. 142:242272.
  • Yom-Tov, Y., T. M. Heggberget, W. Øystein, and S. Yom-Tov. 2006. Body size changes in the Norwegian otter: the possible effects of food availability and global warming. Oecologia 150:155160.