Genetic structure of the white-footed mouse in the context of the emergence of Lyme disease in southern Québec
Article first published online: 3 JUN 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Ecology and Evolution
Volume 3, Issue 7, pages 2075–2088, July 2013
Total views since publication: 320
How to Cite
Ecology and Evolution 2013; 3(7): 2075–2088
- Issue published online: 10 JUL 2013
- Article first published online: 3 JUN 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 29 APR 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 26 APR 2013
- Manuscript Received: 8 FEB 2013
- Québec Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune
- Québec Centre for Biodiversity Science
|ece3620-sup-0001-FigS1.pdf||application/PDF||108K||Figure S1. Study area with pie charts showing the ratios of assigned genetic clusters of individuals in each population from STRUCTURE.|
Table S1. FST values (above the diagonal) for the 11 populations studied and the number of significant results for the Fisher exact test (below the diagonal) for the eleven loci. Significant FST values are indicated by asterisks (nsP > 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). Probabilities were adjusted with sequential Bonferroni corrections.
Table S2. STRUCTURE results showing [A] the probability values for the number of genetic clusters (L[K] with standard deviation [SD] and ΔK) for mice from Montérégie, Québec, using K = 1–12, and [B] the proportion (Q) of every population's genome that is part of each K subpopulation (K = 2).
Table S3. Effective number of migrants (Nm) for all mountain populations and their closest fragment (source-sink pairs identified by matching symbols). Total Nm is summed as total immigrationa and total emigrationb rates for each population.
Table S4. Gene flow symmetry (GFS) indices between source-sink populations. If gene flow moved asymmetrically from site i to site j, then we would expect private alleles to accumulate faster at site i thus creating a GFS index of greater than 1. Asymmetrical gene flow is observed between two mountain populations (site i) and their nearest forest fragment populations (site j): higher flow from site D to H and from site C to J.
Table S5. Results of the assignment test where the 11 populations in the Montérégie region were considered independent units. The success rate of assignment is indicated as %, and n represents the population size.
Appendix S1. PCR and primer information.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.