SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abbot, P., and L. M. Dill. 2001. Sexually transmitted parasites and sexual selection in the milkweed leaf beetle, Labidomera clivicollis. Oikos 92:91100.
  • Benesh, D. P., E. T. Valtonen, and O. Seppaelae. 2008. Multidimensionality and intra-individual variation in host manipulation by acanthocephalan. Parasitology 135:617626.
  • Berdoy, M., J. P. Webster, and D. W. Macdonald. 2000. Fatal attraction in rats infected with Toxoplasma gondii. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:15911594.
  • Brodeur, J., and L. E. M. Vet. 1994. Usurpation of host behaviour by a parasitic wasp. Anim. Behav. 48:187192.
  • Cézilly, F., and M.-J. Perrot-Minnot. 2005. Studying adaptive changes in the behaviour of infected hosts: a long and winding road. Behav. Process. 68:223228.
  • Cézilly, F., and M.-J. Perrot-Minnot. 2010. Interpreting multidimensionality in parasite-induced phenotypic alterations: panselectionism versus parsimony. Oikos 119:12241229.
  • Dawkins, R. 1982. The extended phenotype. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
  • Dianne, L., T. Rigaud, S. Léger, S. Motreuil, A. Bauer, and M. J. Perrot-Minnot. 2010. Intraspecific conflict over host manipulation between different larval parasites of an acanthocephalan parasite. J. Evol. Biol. 23:26482655.
  • Drummond, F. A., R. A. Cassagrande, and P. A. Logan. 1989. Population dynamics of Chrysomelobia labidomerae Eickwort, a parasite of the Colorado potato beetle. Int. J. Acarol. 15:3145.
  • Grossman, A. H., A. Janssen, E. F. De Brito, E. G. Cordeiro, F. Colares, J. O. Fonseca, et al. 2008. Parasitoid increases survival of its pupae by inducing hosts to fight predators. PLoS ONE 3:e2276.
  • Haine, E. R., K. Boucansaud, and T. Rigaud. 2005. Conflict between parasites with different transmission strategies infecting an amphipod host. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272:25052510.
  • Harvey, J. A., M. Kos, Y. Nakamatsu, T. Tanaka, M. Dicke, L. E. M. Vet, et al. 2008. Do parasitized catterpillars protect their parasitoids from hyperparasitoids? A test of the'usurpation hypothesis'. Anim. Behav. 76:701708.
  • Helluy, S. 1984. Relations hôtes-parasites du trématode Microphallus papillorobustus (Rankin, 1940). III. Facteurs impliqués dans les modifications du comportement des Gammarus hôtes intermédiaires et tests de prédation. Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp. 59:4156.
  • Hughes, D., J. Brodeur, and F. Thomas. 2012. Host manipulation by parasites. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
  • Lafferty, K. D., F. Thomas, and R. Poulin. 2000. Evolution of host-phenotype manipulation by parasites and its consequences. Pp. 117127 in R. Poulin, S. Morand and A. Skorping, eds. Evolutionary biology of host-parasite relationships: theory meets reality. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • Lefèvre, T., B. Roche, R. Poulin, H. Hurd, F. Renaud, and F. Thomas. 2008. Exploitation of host compensatory responses: the ‘must’ of manipulation? Trends Parasitol. 24:435439.
  • Lefèvre, T., S. A. Adamo, D. G. Biron, D. Missé, D. Hughes, and F. Thomas. 2009. Invasion of the body snatchers: the diversity and evolution of manipulative strategies in host-parasite interactions. Adv. Parasitol. 68:4583.
  • Maure, F., J. Brodeur, N. Ponlet, J. Doyon, A. Firlej, E. Elguero, et al. 2011. The cost of a bodyguard. Biol. Letters 6:843846.
  • Moore, J. 2002. Parasites and the behavior of animals. Oxford series in ecology and evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
  • Poulin, R. 1994a. The evolution of parasite manipulation of host behaviour: a theoretical analysis. Parasitology 109:S109S118.
  • Poulin, R. 1994b. Meta-analysis of parasite-induced behavioural changes. Anim. Behav. 48:137146.
  • Poulin, R. 2010. Parasite manipulation of host behavior: an update and frequently asked questions. Adv. Stud. Behav. 41:151186.
  • Thomas, F., F. Renaud, and F. Cézilly. 1996. Assortative mating by parasitic prevalence in Gammarus insensibilis (Amphipoda): patterns and processes. Anim. Behav. 52:683690.
  • Thomas, F., A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, G. Martin, C. Manu, P. Durand, and F. Renaud. 2002a. Do Hairworms (Nematomorpha) manipulate their terrestrial host to seek water? J. Evol. Biol. 15:356361.
  • Thomas, F., S. P. Brown, M. Sukhdeo, and F. Renaud. 2002b. Understanding parasite strategies: a state-dependent approach? Trends Parasitol. 18:387390.
  • Thomas, F., J. Fauchier, and K. D. Lafferty. 2002c. Conflict of interest between a nematode and a trematode in an amphipod host: test of the sabotage hypothesid. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51:296301.
  • Thomas, F., S. A. Adamo, and J. Moore. 2005. Parasitic manipulation: where are we and where should we go? Behav. Process. 68:185199.
  • Thomas, F., R. Poulin, and J. Brodeur. 2010. Host manipulation by parasites: a multidimensional phenomenon. Oikos 119:12171223.
  • Thomas, F., J. Brodeur, F. Maure, N. Franceschi, S. Blanchet, and T. Rigaud. 2011. Intraspecific variability in host manipulation by parasites. Infect. Genet. Evol. 11:262269.
  • Thomas, F., T. Rigaud , and J. Brodeur. 2012. Evolutionary routes leading to host manipulation by parasites. Pp. 1634 in D. Hughes, J. Brodeur, F. Thomas, eds. Host manipulation by parasites. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
  • Yanoviak, S. P., M. Kaspari, R. Dudley, and G. Poinar Jr.,. 2008. Parasite-induced fruit mimicry in a tropical canopy ant. Am. Nat. 171:536544.