Predicting rarity and decline in animals, plants, and mushrooms based on species attributes and indicator groups
Article first published online: 28 AUG 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Ecology and Evolution
Volume 3, Issue 10, pages 3401–3414, September 2013
How to Cite
Ecology and Evolution 2013; 3(10): 3401–3414
- Issue published online: 19 SEP 2013
- Article first published online: 28 AUG 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 28 JUN 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 19 JUN 2013
- Manuscript Received: 4 MAR 2013
- The Dutch Ministry of Economics, Agriculture and Innovation. Grant Number: ond/2009/010/1
Table S1. Dutch red lists used in this study. N spec.: number of Dutch indigenous and reproducing species; Eval.: number of species evaluated for the Red List; Sel.: number of species selected for this study. Number of Dutch species is based on the most recent list of (Noordijk et al. 2010).
Table S2. List of attributes. Availability: Ev, evaluated species; We, well-known species; Po, poorly-known species. Species group: An, animals; Pl, plants; Mu, mushrooms.
Figure S1. Definitions of prevalence, correct classification, Type I error and Type II error probability.
Figure S2. Theoretical effect of prevalence, that is, the number of declining species divided by the total number of species, of the species group and Type I and Type II error probabilities on correct classifications. The effect of three examples of combinations of Type I and Type II error probabilities are shown.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.