Degrading habitats and the effect of topographic complexity on risk assessment
Article first published online: 30 SEP 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Ecology and Evolution
Volume 3, Issue 12, pages 4221–4229, October 2013
Total views since publication: 3
How to Cite
Ecology and Evolution 2013; 3(12): 4221–4229
- Issue published online: 23 OCT 2013
- Article first published online: 30 SEP 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 29 AUG 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 25 AUG 2013
- Manuscript Received: 24 MAY 2013
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies. Grant Number: CE0561432
Figure S1–S2. Topographic complexities in the field and laboratory.
Figure S1. The difference between (A) live, healthy coral reef environment (topographically complex; containing numerous crevices and holes to hide in) and that of a (B) degraded, low complexity reef.
Figure S2. The three different topography treatments: 1) no topography, consisting of the basic tank design as described in the main text; 2) high structure but no visual barrier; 3) high structure and a visual barrier.
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.