Dramatic response to climate change in the Southwest: Robert Whittaker's 1963 Arizona Mountain plant transect revisited
Article first published online: 19 SEP 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Ecology and Evolution
Volume 3, Issue 10, page 3636, September 2013
How to Cite
(2013), Dramatic response to climate change in the Southwest: Robert Whittaker's 1963 Arizona Mountain plant transect revisited. Ecology and Evolution, 3: 3636. doi: 10.1002/ece3.832
- Issue published online: 19 SEP 2013
- Article first published online: 19 SEP 2013
Vol. 3, Issue 10, 3307–3319, Article first published online: 13 AUG 2013
Richard C. Brusca, John F. Wiens, Wallace M. Meyer, Jeff Eble, Kim Franklin, Jonathan T. Overpeck &Wendy Moore
Ecology and Evolution 2013; 3(10): 3307–3319
Just after our paper appeared in Ecology & Evolution's “Early View” online, we discovered an error in how we reported the original Whittaker and Niering (1964) sample data. We reported that they used 30 0.1-Ha upland (nonriparian/nonwet canyon) samples between 3500 ft and 9000 ft along the Catalina Highway. However, these 30 samples were actually what Whittaker called “grouped samples” as described by Whittaker (1967) (p. 212). Each “grouped sample” is actually combined data from either 5- or 10 0.1-Ha quadrats. These are the 30 sample points in Figure 1 (Whittaker and Niering 1964), labeled b through f, between 3500 ft and 9000 ft.
While this discovery reveals differences in sampling efforts, it does not change the results of our statistical analysis (one-sample t-test) or our conclusions, and we are confident that our sampling effort was sufficient. As noted in our paper, soil types on the southern slopes of the Catalinas, especially along the Catalina Highway, are remarkably uniform, and plant species presence is highly predictable based on elevation and aspect, especially for the species that we analyzed. It is possible that if a given species was normally distributed across elevation gradients, it would be easier to miss that species’ occurrence when sampling the tails of its distribution (i.e., the lowest and highest elevations). However, our samples were separated from one another (on average) by just 50 m in elevation, and species showing upslope movement of lower elevation had an average gain of nearly 260 m (850 ft) – more than five times our elevation sampling breaks – indicating that our sampling effort was adequate.
- 1964. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. I. Ecological classification and distribution of species. J. Arizona Acad. Sci. 3:9–34. , and .
- 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol. Rev. 49:207–264.