Data Archiving: Mathematica code for the proofs and figures will be archived in Dryad. Raw data to recreate Figure will be archived in Dryad.
The magnitude of local adaptation under genotype-dependent dispersal
Article first published online: 30 OCT 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Ecology and Evolution
Volume 3, Issue 14, pages 4722–4735, November 2013
How to Cite
Ecology and Evolution 2013; 3(14): 4722–4735
- Issue published online: 25 NOV 2013
- Article first published online: 30 OCT 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 9 SEP 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 6 SEP 2013
- Manuscript Received: 1 JUL 2013
- David and Lucille Packard Foundation
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Figure S1. Probability of dispersal in the specific model of habitat choice (eq. (4)).
Figure S2. Local adaptation with genotype-dependent dispersal at equilibrium.
Figure S3. Local adaptation at equilibrium with genotype-dependent dispersal when migration is costly.
Figure S4. Degree of population divergence in allele frequency, Δeq, with asymmetric selection (A) or migration (B) in the two habitats.
Figure S5. Amount of first-generation divergence in allele frequency due to GDD.
Figure S6. Time to approach equilibrium. Shown is the number of generations required for the system to move 95% of the way to equilibrium (α = 0.95).
Figure S7. Adaptive dispersal increases allele frequency divergence between habitats.
Figure S8. The effective migration rate between habitats changes dynamically with GDD.
Figure S9. Genotype-dependent dispersal causes emigrating individuals to be a biased sample of the individuals within a habitat.
Figure S10. The relationship between variance in fitness at the start of a generation and the resulting genetic load, for two mean migration rates (A, B).
|ece3850-sup-0002-DataS1.nb||application/vnd.wolfram.mathematica||14086K||Data S1. Data sufficient to recreate the empirical plot of divergence between lake and stream stickleback, Fig. 1. The data were collected and analyzed as originally described in Bolnick et al. (2009). Evolution. The data had not previously been presented in the same form as in Fig. 1.|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.