SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Baldo, L., J. C. Dunning Hotopp, K. A. Jolley, S. R. Bordenstein, S. A. Biber, R. R. Choudhury, et al. 2006. Multilocus sequence typing system for the Endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:70987110.
  • Bird, C. D., G. J. Hilchie, N. G. Kondla, E. M. Pike, and F. A. Sperling. 1995. Alberta butterflies. Provincial Museum of Alberta, Edmonton.
  • Bozano, G. C. 2002. Satyrinae part III. Pp. 171 in G. C. Bozano, ed. Guide to the butterflies of the Palearctic Region. Omnes Artes, Milano.
  • Bromilow, S. M., and F. A. H. Sperling. 2011. Phylogeographic signal variation in mitochondrial DNA among geographically isolated grassland butterflies. J. Biogeogr. 38:299310.
  • Charlat, S., A. Duplouy, E. A. Hornett, E. A. Dyson, N. Davies, G. K. Roderick, et al. 2009. The joint evolutionary histories of Wolbachia and mitochondria in Hypolimnas bolina. BMC Evol. Biol. 9:64.
  • Dobson, S. L., K. Bourtzis, H. R. Braig, B. F. Jones, W. Zhou, F. Rousset, et al. 1999. Wolbachia infections are distributed throughout insect somatic and germ line tissues. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 29:153160.
  • Dunning Hotopp, J. C., M. Lin, R. Madupu, J. Crabtree, S. V. Angiuoli, J. Eisen, et al. 2006. Comparative genomics of emerging human Ehrlichiosis agents. PLoS Genet. 2:e21.
  • Dupuis, J. R., A. D. Roe, and F. A. H. Sperling. 2012. Multi-locus species delimitation in closely related animals and fungi: one marker is not enough. Mol. Ecol. 21:44224436.
  • Duron, O., D. Bouchon, S. Boutin, L. Bellamy, L. Zhou, J. Engelstädter, et al. 2008. The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone. BMC Evol. Biol. 6:27.
  • Dyer, K. A., C. Burke, and J. Jaenike. 2011. Wolbachia-mediated persistence of mtDNA from a potentially extinct species. Mol. Ecol. 20:28052817.
  • Excoffier, L., G. Laval, and S. Schneider. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinformat. Online 1:4750.
  • Funk, D. J., and K. E. Omland. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:397423.
  • Galtier, N., B. Nabholz, S. Glémin, and G. D. D. Hurst. 2009. Mitochondrial DNA as a marker of molecular diversity: a reappraisal. Mol. Ecol. 18:45414550.
  • Gerth, M., A. Geißler, and C. Bledidorn. 2011. Wolbachia infections in bees (Anthophila) and possible implications for DNA barcoding. Syst. Biodivers. 9:319327.
  • Gompert, Z., C. C. Nice, J. A. Fordyce, M. L. Forister, and A. M. Shapiro. 2006. Identifying units for conservation using molecular systematics: the cautionary tale of the Karner blue butterfly. Mol. Ecol. 15:17591768.
  • Gouy, M., S. Guindon, and O. Gascuel. 2010. SeaView Version 4: A Multiplatform Graphical User Interface for Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Tree Building. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:221224.
  • Guindon, S., and O. Gascuel. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52:696704.
  • Guindon, S., J.-F. Dufayard, V. Lefort, M. Anisimova, W. Hordijk, and O. Gascuel. 2010. New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59:307321.
  • Hall, T. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser. 41:9598.
  • Harrigan, R. J., M. E. Mazza, and M. D. Sorenson. 2008. Computation vs. cloning: evaluation of two methods for haplotype determination. Mol. Ecol. Res. 8:12391248.
  • Harrison, R. G. 1990. Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:68128.
  • Higgins, L. G. 1975. The classification of European butterflies. Collins, London, UK.
  • Hudson, R. R., and M. Turelli. 2003. Stochasticity overrules the “three-times rule”: genetic drift, genetic draft, and coalescence times for nuclear loci versus mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 57:182190.
  • Hurst, G. D. D., and F. M. Jiggins. 2005. Problems with mitochondrial DNA as a marker in population, phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies: the effects of inherited symbionts. Proceed. Royal Soc. London Series B Biol. Sci. 272:15251534.
  • Hurst, G. D. D., and M. E. N. Majerus. 1993. Why do maternally inherited microorganisms kill males? Heredity 71:8195.
  • Jeyaprakash, A., and M. A. Hoy. 2000. Long PCR improves Wolbachia DNA amplification: wsp sequences found in 76% of sixty-three arthropod species. Insect Mol. Biol. 9:393405.
  • Jiggins, F. M. 2003. Male-killing Wolbachia and mitochondrial DNA: selective sweeps, hybrid introgression and parasite population dynamics. Genetics 164:512.
  • Johnstone, R. A., and G. D. D. Hurst. 1996. Maternally inherited male-killing microorganisms may confound interpretation of mitochondrial DNA variability. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58:453470.
  • Joyce, D. A., R. L. H. Dennis, S. R. Bryant, T. G. Shreeve, J. S. Ready, and A. S. Pullin. 2009. Do taxonomic divisions reflect genetic differentiation? A comparison of morphological and genetic data in Coenonympha tullia (Müller), Satyrinae. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 97:314327.
  • Kodandaramaiah, U., and N. Wahlberg. 2009. Phylogeny and biogeography of Coenonympha butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) – patterns of colonization in the Holarctic. Syst. Entomol. 34:315323.
  • Kodandaramaiah, U., E. Weingartner, N. Janz, L. Dalen, and S. Nylin. 2011. Population structure in relation to host-plant ecology and Wolbachia infestation in the comma butterfly. J. Evol. Biol. 24:21732185.
  • Kvie, K. S., S. Hogner, L. Aarvik, J. T. Lifjeld, and A. Johnsen. 2013. Deep sympatric mtDNA divergence in the autumnal moth (Epirrita autumnata). Ecol. Evol. 3:126144.
  • Layberry, R. A., P. W. Hall, and J. D. Lafontaine. 1998. The butterflies of Canada. Univ. of Toronto Press, Toronto.
  • Librado, P., and J. Rozas. 2009. DnaSP V5: A Software for Comprehensive Analysis of DNA Polymorphism Data. Bioinformatics 25:14511452.
  • Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
  • Parr, C. S., R. Guralnick, N. Cellinese, and R. D. M. Page. 2012. Evolutionary informatics: unifying knowledge about the diversity of life. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27:94103.
  • Pelham, J. P. 2008 A catalogue of the butterflies of the United States and Canada with a complete bibliography of the descriptive and systematic literature. J. Res. Lepidoptera 40:658.
  • Posada, D. 2008. jModelTest: Phylogenetic Model Averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:12531256.
  • Rokas, A., B. L. Williams, N. King, and S. B. Carroll. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798804.
  • Salazar, C., C. D. Jiggins, J. E. Taylor, M. R. Kronforst, and M. Linares. 2008. Gene flow and the genealogical history of Heliconius heurippa. BMC Evol. Biol. 8:132.
  • Scott, J. A. 1986. The butterflies of North America. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford.
  • Sei, M. and A. H. Porter. 2003. Microhabitat-specific early-larval survival of the maritime ringlet (Coenonympha tullia nipisiquit). Anim. Conserv. 6:5561.
  • Sei, M., and A. H. Porter. 2007. Delimiting species boundaries and the conservation genetics of the endangered maritime ringlet butterfly (Coenonympha nipisiquit McDunnough). Mol. Ecol. 16:33133325.
  • Simonsen, T.J., and P. Huemer. 2014. Phylogeography of Hepialus humuli (L.) (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae) in Europe: short distance vs. large scale postglacial expansions from multiple Alpine refugia and taxonomic implications. Insect Syst. Evol., in press.
  • Sperling, F. A. H. 1993. Mitochondrial DNA variation and Haldane's rule in the Papilio glaucus and P. troilus species groups. Heredity 71:227233.
  • Sperling, F. A. H. 2003. Butterfly molecular systematics: from species definitions to higher-level phylogenetics. Pp. 431458 in C. L. Boggs, W. B. Watt, and P. R. Ehrlich, eds. Butterflies: evolution and ecology taking flight. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Stephens, M., and P. Donnelly. 2003. A Comparison of Bayesian Methods for Haplotype Reconstruction from Population Genotype Data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73:11621169.
  • Stephens, M., N. J. Smith, and P. Donnelly. 2001. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68:978989.
  • Tajima, F. 1983. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105:437460.
  • Tamura, K., D. Peterson, N. Peterson, G. Stecher, M. Nei, and S. Kumar. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:27312739.
  • Turelli, M., and A. A. Hoffmann. 1996. Cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans: dynamics and population estimates from natural populations. Genetics 140:13191338.
  • Wahlberg, N., and S. Nylin. 2003. Morphology versus molecules: resolution of the positions of Nymphalis, Polygonia and related genera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Cladistics 19:213223.
  • Wahlberg, N., and C. W. Wheat. 2008. Genomic outposts serve the phylogenomic pioneers: designing novel nuclear markers for genomic DNA extractions of Lepidoptera. Syst. Biol. 57:231242.
  • Weeks, A. R., R. Velten, and R. Stouthamer. 2003. Incidence of a New Sex–ratio–distorting Endosymbiotic Bacterium among arthropods. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:18571865.
  • Werren, J. H. 1997. Biology of Wolbachia. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42:587609.
  • Wu, M., L. V. Sun, J. Vamathevan, M. Riegler, R. Deboy, J. C. Brownlie, et al. 2004. Phylogenomics of the reproductive parasite Wolbachia pipientis wMel: A streamlined genome overrun by mobile genetic elements. PLoS Biol. 2:03280341.
  • Zhou, W., F. Rousset, and S. O'Neil. 1998. Phylogeny and PCR-based classification of Wolbachia strains using wsp gene sequences. Proceed. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 265:509515.