SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Altshuler, D. L., and C. J. Clark. 2003. Darwin's hummingbirds. Science 300:588589.
  • Benkman, C. W. 1993. Adaptation to single resources and the evolution of crossbill (Loxia) diversity. Ecol. Monogr. 63:305325.
  • Bleiweiss, R. 1999. Joint effects of feeding and breeding behavior on trophic dimorphism in hummingbirds. Proc. Biol. Soc. B 266:24912497.
  • Bleiweiss, R. 2001. Asymmetrical expression of transsexual phenotypes in hummingbirds. Proc. Biol. Soc. B 268:639646.
  • Blondel, J. 2000. Evolution and ecology of birds on islands: trends and prospects. Vie Milieu 50:205220.
  • Boag, P. T., and P. R. Grant. 1981. Intense natural selection in a population of Darwin's finches (Geospizinae) in the Galapagos. Science 214:8285.
  • Bowman, R. I. (1961) Morphological differentiation and adaptation in the Galapagos finches. University of California Publications in Zoology, Berkeley, CA, 1302 p.
  • Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Clegg, S. M. and I. P. F. Owens. 2002. The ‘island rule’ in birds: medium body size and its ecological explanation. Proc. Biol. Soc. 269:13591365.
  • Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, 1st edn. John Murray, London.
  • Grant, P. R. 1968. Bill size, body size and the ecological adaptations of bird species to competitive situations on islands. Syst. Zool. 17:319333.
  • Grant, P. R. 1986. Ecology and evolution of Darwin's finches. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Grant, P. R. and B. R. Grant. 2003. Reversed sexual size dimorphism in the beak of a finch. Ibis 145:341343.
  • Grant, P. R., and B. R. Grant. 2006. Evolution of character displacement in Darwin's finches. Science 313:224.
  • Greenberg, R., and R. Danner. 2012. The influence of the California marine layer on bill size in a generalist songbird. Evolution 66:38253835.
  • Greenberg, R., and R. Danner. 2013. Climate, ecological release and bill dimorphism in an island songbird. Biol. Lett., 9:20130118, published 24 April 2013.
  • Greenberg, R., and B. Olsen. 2010. Bill size and dimorphism in tidal-marsh sparrows: island-like processes in a continental habitat. Ecology 91:24282436.
  • Greenberg, R., R. Danner, B. Olsen, and D. Luther. 2012a. High summer temperature explains bill size variation in salt marsh sparrows. Ecography 35:146152.
  • Greenberg, R., V. Cadena, R. Danner, and G. Tattersall. 2012b. Heat loss may explain bill size differences between birds occupying different habitats. PLoS ONE 7:e40933. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040933.
  • Grenier, L. J., and R. Greenberg. 2005. A biogeographic pattern in sparrow bill morphology: parallel adaptation to tidal marsh. Evolution 59:15881595.
  • Lowther, P. E., C. Celada, N. K. Klein, C. C. Rimner, and D. A. Spector. 1999. Yellow Warbler (Dendroica petechia), in A. Poole, F. Gill, eds. The birds of North America, No. 454. The Birds of North America Online, Ithaca, NY.
  • Luther, D. A., and R. Greenberg. 2011. The island syndrome in coastal wetland ecosystems: convergent evolution of large bills in mangrove passerines. Auk 128:201204.
  • Pulliam, H. R., and F. Enders. 1971. The feeding ecology of five sympatric finch species. Ecology 52:557566.
  • Pyle, P. 1997. Identification guide to North American birds. Part I. Columbidae to Ploceidae. Slate Creek Press, Bolinas, CA.
  • Salgado-Ortiz, J., P. P. Marra, T. S. Sillett, and R. J. Robertson. 2008. Breeding ecology of the Mangrove Warbler (Dendroica petechia bryanti) and comparative life history of the Yellow Warbler subspecies complex. Auk 125:402410.
  • Scott, S. N., S. M. Clegg, S. P. Blomberg, J. Kikkawa, and I. P. F. Owens. 2003. Morphological shifts in island–dwelling birds: the role of generalized foraging niche and niche expansion. Evolution 9:21472156.
  • Scott, G. R., V. Cadena, G. J. Tattersall, and W. M. Milsom. 2008. Body temperature depression and peripheral heat loss accompany the metabolic and ventilatory responses to hypoxia in low and high altitude birds. J. Exp. Biol. 211:13261335.
  • Selander, R. K. 1966. Sexual dimorphism and differential niche utilization in birds. Condor 68:113151.
  • Smith, T. B. 1990. Resource use by bill morphs of an African finch: evidence for intraspecific competition. Ecology 71:12461257.
  • Stamps, J. A., J. B. Losos, and R. M. Andrews. 1997. A comparative study of population density and size dimorphism in lizards. Am. Nat. 149:6490.
  • Symonds, M. R. E. and G. J. Tattersall. 2010. Geographical variation in bill size across bird species provides evidence for Allen's rule. Am. Nat. 176:188197.
  • Szekely, T. R., P. Freckleton, and J. D. Reynolds. 2004. Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of size dimorphism in shorebirds. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 101:1222412227.
  • Tattersall, G. J., D. V. Andrade, and A. S. Abe. 2009. Heat exchange from the toucan bill reveals a controllable vascular thermal radiator. Science 325:468470.
  • Temeles, E. J., C. R. Koulouris, S .E. Sander, and W. J. Kress. 2009. Effect of flower shape and size on foraging performance and trade-offs in a tropical hummingbird. Ecology 90:11471161.
  • Temeles, T. J., I. L. Pan, J. L. Brennan, and J. N. Horwitt. 2000. Evidence for ecological causation of sexual dimorphism in a hummingbird. Science 289:441443.