SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Albrecht, M., B. Schmid, Y. Hautier, and C. B. Müller. 2012. Diverse pollinator communities enhance plant reproductive success. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279:48454852.
  • Anderson, J. M. 1977. The organization of soil animal communities. Ecol. Bull. 25:1523.
  • Bady, P., S. Dolédec, C. Fesl, S. Gayraud, M. Bacchi, and F. Schöll. 2005. Use of invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of European large rivers: the effects of sampling effort on genus richness and functional diversity. Freshw. Biol. 50:159173.
  • Beier, C. M. 2008. Ecosystem services and emergent vulnerability in managed ecosystems: a geospatial decision-support tool. Ecosystems 11:923938.
  • Berg, M. P., M. Soesbergen, D. Tempelman, and H. Wijnhoven. 2008. Verspreidingsatlas Nederlandse Landpissebedden, Duizendpoten En Miljoenpoten (Isopoda, Chilopoda, Diplopoda). EIS-Nederland, Leiden & Vrije Universiteit-Afdeling Dierecologie, Amsterdam.
  • de Bello, F., S. Lavorel, S. Díaz, R. Harrington, J. H. C. Cornelissen, R. D. Bardgett, et al. 2010. Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodivers. Conserv. 19:28732893.
  • Bokhorst, S., J. W. Bjerke, J. Melillo, T. V. Callaghan, and G. K. Phoenix. 2010. Impacts of extreme winter warming events on litter decomposition in a sub-Arctic heathland. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42:611617.
  • Butterfield, B. J., and K. N. Suding. 2013. Single-trait functional indices outperform multi-trait indices in linking environmental gradients and ecosystem services in a complex landscape. J. Ecol. 101:917.
  • Calcagno, V., and C. de Mazancourt. 2010. glmulti: an R package for easy automated model selection with (generalized) linear models. J. Stat. Softw. 34:129.
  • Carpenter, S. R., H. A. Mooney, J. Agard, D. Capistrano, R. S. DeFries, S. Díaz, et al. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 106:13051312.
  • Chapin, F. S., III, P. A. Matson, and P. M. Vitousek 2011 Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.
  • Conti, G., and S. Díaz. 2013. Plant functional diversity and carbon storage – an empirical test in semi-arid forest ecosystems. J. Ecol. 101:1828.
  • Couûteaux, M.-M., P. Bottner, and B. Berg. 1995. Litter decomposition, climate and liter quality. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:6366.
  • De Oliveira, T., S. Hättenschwiler, and I. Tanya Handa. 2010. Snail and millipede complementarity in decomposing Mediterranean forest leaf litter mixtures. Funct. Ecol. 24:937946.
  • Dias, A. T. C., M. P. Berg, F. de Bello, A. R. Van Oosten, K. Bílá, and M. Moretti. 2013. An experimental framework to identify community functional components driving ecosystem processes and services delivery. J. Ecol. 101:2937.
  • Díaz, S., S. Lavorel, F. de Bello, F. Quétier, K. Grigulis, and T. M. Robson. 2007. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 104:2068420689.
  • Garnier, E., J. Cortez, G. Billès, M.-L. Navas, C. Roumet, M. Debussche, et al. 2004. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85:26302637.
  • Grime, J. P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J. Ecol. 86:902910.
  • Hassall, M. and S. L. Sutton. 1977. The role of isopods as decomposers in a dune grassland ecosystem. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc. 6:235245.
  • Hättenschwiler, S., A. V. Tiunov, and S. Scheu. 2005. Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36:191218.
  • Hector, A. and R. Bagchi. 2007. Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 448:188190.
  • Heemsbergen, D. A., M. P. Berg, M. Loreau, J. R. van Hal, J. H. Faber, and H. A. Verhoef. 2004. Biodiversity effects on soil processes explained by interspecific functional dissimilarity. Science 306:10191020.
  • Hooper, D. U., F. S. Chapin, J. J. Ewel, A. Hector, and P. Inchausti. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 75:335.
  • Ibanez, S., O. Manneville, C. Miquel, P. Taberlet, A. Valentini, S. Aubert, et al. 2013. Plant functional traits reveal the relative contribution of habitat and food preferences to the diet of grasshoppers. Oecologia 173:14591470.
  • Lavelle, P., and A. Spain. 2001 Soil Ecology. Kluwer Scientific Publications, Amsterdam.
  • Lavorel, S., and E. Garnier. 2002. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct. Ecol. 16:545556.
  • Lavorel, S., K. Grigulis, P. Lamarque, M.-P. Colace, D. Garden, J. Girel, et al. 2011. Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. J. Ecol. 99:135147.
  • Leps, J., F. de Bello, S. Lavorel, and S. Berman. 2006. Quantifying and interpreting functional diversity of natural communities: practical considerations matter. Preslia 78:481501.
  • Loring, P. A. 2008. The services-oriented architecture: ecosystem services as a framework for diagnosing change in social ecological systems. Ecosystems 11:478489.
  • Luck, G. W., R. Harrington, P. A. Harrison, C. Kremen, P. M. Berry, R. Bugter, et al. 2009. Quantifying the contribution of organisms to the provision of ecosystem services. Bioscience 59:223235.
  • Makkonen, M., M. P. Berg, J. R. van Hal, T. V. Callaghan, M. C. Press, and R. Aerts. 2011. Traits explain the responses of a sub-arctic Collembola community to climate manipulation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43:377384.
  • McCulloch, C. E., and S. R. Searle 2001 Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Mermillod-Blondin, F., M. Gérino, M. C. des Châtelliers, V. Degrange, M. Gerino, M. C. des Chatelliers, et al. 2002. Functional diversity among 3 detritivorous hyporheic invertebrates: an experimental study in microcosms. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 21:132.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  • Mokany, K., J. Ash, and S. Roxburgh. 2008. Functional identity is more important than diversity in influencing ecosystem processes in a temperate native grassland. J. Ecol. 96:884893.
  • Moretti, M., F. de Bello, S. Ibanez, S. Fontana, G. B. Pezzatti, F. Dziock, et al. 2013. Linking traits between plants and invertebrate herbivores to track functional effects of land-use changes. J. Veg. Sci. 24:949962.
  • Mouillot, D., S. Villéger, M. Scherer-Lorenzen, and N. W. H. Mason. 2011. Functional structure of biological communities predicts ecosystem multifunctionality. PLoS ONE 6:e17476.
  • Petchey, O. L., A. Hector, and K. J. Gaston. 2004. How do different measures of functional diversity perform? Ecology 85:847857.
  • R Development Core Team. 2012 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2.15.0. R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria.
  • Ricotta, C., and M. Moretti. 2011. CWM and Rao's quadratic diversity: a unified framework for functional ecology. Oecologia 167:181188.
  • Roscher, C., J. Schumacher, M. Gubsch, A. Lipowsky, A. Weigelt, N. Buchmann, et al. 2012. Using plant functional traits to explain diversity–productivity relationships. PLoS ONE 7:e36760.
  • Schmalfuss, H. 1984. Eco-morphological strategies in terrestrial isopods. Symp. zool. Soc. Lond. 53:4963.
  • Schmalfuss, H. 2003. World Catalog of Terrestrial Isopods (Isopoda:Oniscidea). Staatl. Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Schumacher, J. and C. Roscher. 2009. Differential effects of functional traits on aboveground biomass in semi-natural grasslands. Oikos 118:16591668.
  • Swift, M. J., O. W. Heal, and J. M. Anderson. 1979. Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
  • Thompson, K., A. P. Askew, J. P. Grime, N. P. Dunnett, and A. J. Willis. 2005. Biodiversity, ecosystem function and plant traits in mature and immature plant communities. Funct. Ecol. 19:355358.
  • Tilman, D., D. Wedin, and J. Knops. 1996. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379:718720.
  • Treplin, M., S. C. Pennings, and M. Zimmer. 2013. Decomposition of Leaf Litter in a U.S. Saltmarsh is Driven by Dominant Species. Not Species Complementarity. Wetlands 33:8389.
  • Verbeke, G. and G. Molenberghs. 2000. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. Springer, New York.
  • Vilisics, F., Z. Elek, G. L. Lövei, and E. Hornung. 2007. Composition of terrestrial isopod assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in Denmark. Pedobiologia 51:4553.
  • Vilisics, F., S. Szekeres, and E. Hornung. 2012. Size dependent differences in litter consumption of isopods: preliminary results. ZooKeys 176:247259.
  • Villéger, S., N. W. H. Mason, and D. Mouillot. 2008. New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology 89:22902301.
  • Vos, V. C. A., J. van Ruijven, M. P. Berg, E. T. H. M. Peeters, and F. Berendse. 2011. Macro-detritivore identity drives leaf litter diversity effects. Oikos 120:10921098.
  • Wouters, K., J. M. Tavernier, and L. Meurisse. 2000. Distribution and bibliography of the terrestrial Isopoda (Crustacea) of Belgium. Bull. Inst. r. Sci. Nat. Belg. 70:193205.
  • Zimmer, M. 2006. The role of animal-microbe interactions in isopod ecology and evolution. Acta Biol. Benrodis 13:127168.
  • Zimmer, M., G. Kautz, and W. Topp. 2005. Do woodlice and earthworms interact synergistically in leaf litter decomposition? Funct. Ecol. 19:716.