Get access

Hydrologic variation of stemflow yield across co-occurring dominant canopy trees of varying mortality


  • Ethan E. Frost,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Geography, Millersville University, Millersville, PA, USA
    • Correspondence to: Ethan E. Frost, Department of Geography, Millersville University, Millersville, PA 17551, USA.


    Search for more papers by this author
  • Delphis F. Levia Jr.

    1. Department of Geography, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
    2. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
    Search for more papers by this author


Concern over forest dieback due to environmental change and the long residence times of standing dead trees necessitates understanding the impact of forest health on the redistribution of precipitation by forest canopies. Stemflow represents a critical point source input of water and nutrients to forest ecosystems. We investigate the variation in water storage capacity, stemflow volume and stemflow funnelling ratios from two co-occurring dominant canopy species, Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. (American beech) and Liriodendron tulipifera L. (yellow poplar), across three different mortality classes: live, stressed (girdled) and standing dead. Over 25 rainfall events, interspecific differences in stemflow volume distributions were significant over all (U = 45 881, p < 0·0001), leaf-off (U = 11 285, p < 0·0001) and leaf-on (U = 11 582, p < 0·0001) events. Stemflow funnelling ratios were greater in F. grandifolia (26·0 ± 1·2) compared with L. tulipifera (4·9 ± 0·4). Minimum precipitation threshold amounts required to initiate stemflow were lower for F. grandifolia compared with L. tulipifera, and lower for live and stressed compared with dead. Mean stemflow volume from both species was 1·5 ± 0·2 l stem−1 event−1 from dead stems, 89·2 ± 7·7 l stem−1 event−1 from stressed stems and 91·3 ± 8·9 l stem−1 event−1 from live stems. The results of this study improve our understanding of the influence of mortality on rainfall partitioning and stemflow fluxes and may give insight into how mortality generating factors such as pest defoliation and climate change may alter stemflow relationships in forested ecosystems. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Get access to the full text of this article