Research Article
Pursuing sustainable development in Norway: the challenge of living up to Brundtland at home
Article first published online: 18 MAY 2007
DOI: 10.1002/eet.451
Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment
Issue
1756-9338/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=7cc237dabdd5eb94291ec8d5fef2e208b6641573)
European Environment
Special Issue: Sustainable Development Strategies in Europe: Taking Stock 20 years after the Brundtland Report; Edited by R. Steurer and A. Martinuzzi, Research Institute for Managing Sustainability (RIMAS), Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Vienna, Austria
Volume 17, Issue 3, pages 177–188, May/June 2007
Additional Information
How to Cite
Lafferty, W. M., Knudsen, J. and Larsen, O. M. (2007), Pursuing sustainable development in Norway: the challenge of living up to Brundtland at home. Eur. Env., 17: 177–188. doi: 10.1002/eet.451
Publication History
- Issue published online: 18 MAY 2007
- Article first published online: 18 MAY 2007
- Manuscript Accepted: 12 MAR 2007
- Manuscript Revised: 20 DEC 2006
- Manuscript Received: 2 OCT 2006
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Environmental policy integration;
- Norway;
- policy implementation;
- strategy;
- sustainable development
Abstract
With the Norwegian Prime Minister, Gro Harlem Brundtland, as chair of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Norway became an early mover in politics for sustainable development (SD). The pursuit of SD goals has been expressed in several national policy documents, though it was not until 2002 that Norway adopted an explicit ‘National Strategy for Sustainable Development’. This was followed up by a ‘National Action Plan for Sustainable Development’ in 2003. Neither of these initiatives has been actively implemented, and both are now being evaluated and revised by the current ‘red–green’ coalition government. The article presents and assesses strategic SD initiatives from 1989 to the present day. The major conclusion of the analysis is that the Norwegian SD profile is ‘long on promise’ and ‘short on delivery’, and that one major reason for this is the influence of a booming petroleum economy on distributional politics. An exceptional growth in public revenues due to oil and gas fosters intense political competition over the dispensation of economic and welfare benefits – both between political parties and within governing coalitions – and undermines the ‘political will’ to pursue the SD agenda. Given the ability to also use the surplus for development assistance, Norway stands forth as an SD ‘frontrunner’ in international aid, and an SD ‘laggard’ in sustainable production and consumption at home. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

1756-9338/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=8f5fe5d480dd6fbc5399b5418b13a7ad8d9447ba)
1756-9338/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=26ba6b4f5f36948c05a2a0a273fd1233649c243b)