Stereotype threat: the effect of expectancy on performance
Article first published online: 25 OCT 2002
Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
European Journal of Social Psychology
Volume 33, Issue 2, pages 267–285, March/April 2003
How to Cite
Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Frigerio, S., Impagliazzo, L. and Latinotti, S. (2003), Stereotype threat: the effect of expectancy on performance. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 33: 267–285. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.145
- Issue published online: 27 FEB 2003
- Article first published online: 25 OCT 2002
- Manuscript Accepted: 25 JUN 2002
- Manuscript Received: 7 DEC 2001
The goal of this study was to investigate to role of expectancy as a potential mediator of performance deficits under stereotype threat. In Experiment 1, female students were assigned to one of three experimental conditions in which they were told that women perform worse (Negative information), equally (Control) or better (Positive information) than men in logical–mathematical tests. Later, they were given a difficult math test and asked to estimate their performance prior to taking the test. Consistent with predictions, participants who considered logical–mathematical abilities important and received negative information regarding the ingroup showed lower levels of expectations and a sharp decrease in performance compared to women in the positive and control conditions. Moreover, expectancy was found to partially mediate the effect of stereotype threat on performance. In Experiment 2, we tested the generalizability of these results to non-stigmatized groups. A group of Black Americans living in Italy were provided with favorable or unfavorable information about either their minority (Blacks) or their majority (Americans) ingroup. Consistent with predictions, participants both in the minority and in the majority condition had lower expectations and under-performed after negative information about the ingroup. However, the level of expectancy was found to mediate the decrease in performance for participants in the Black but not in the American condition. In the discussion of these results it is suggested that, although comparable performance deficits are found for minority and majority members, the underlying processes may be different. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.