SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Akerlof, K., Maibach, E. W., Fitzgerald, D., Cedeno, A. Y., & Neuman, A. (2013). Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, does it matter? Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 8191.
  • Bagozzi, R. P. (2010). Structural equation models are modelling tools with many ambiguities: Comments acknowledging the need for caution and humility in their use. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(20), 208214.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Freeman, E. H. (1983). Test for stability in linear structural equation systems. Psychometrika, 48, 143145.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Raykov, T. (2000). On measures of explained variance in nonrecursive structural equation models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 125131.
  • Böhm, G. (2003). Emotional reactions to environmental risks: Consequentialist versus ethical evaluation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 199212.
  • Bollen, K. (2005). Structural equation models. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. New York, NY (Bollen): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
  • Bollen, K. (2012). Instrumental variables in sociology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 3772.
  • Breakwell, G. M. (2010). Models of risk construction: some applications to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(6), 857870.
  • Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A., & Grover, H. (2008). Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environment and Behavior, 41, 7295.
  • Brun, W. (1992). Cognitive components in risk perception: Natural versus manmade risks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 117132.
  • Bullock, H. E., Harlow, L. L., & Mulaik, S. A. (1994). Causation issues in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 1(3), 253267.
  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81105.
  • Capstick, S. B., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2014). Public perception of cold weather for and against climate change. Climatic Change, 122(4), 695708.
  • Clore, G. L., & Ortony, A. (2000). Cognition in emotion: Always, sometimes or never? In L. Nadel, R. Lanc, & G. L. Ahern (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Coumou, D., & Rahmstorf, S. (2012). A decade of weather extremes. Nature Climate Change, 2, 491496.
  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.
  • Dohle, S., Keller, C., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Examining the relationship between affect and implicit associations: Implications for risk perception. Risk Analysis, 30(7), 11161128.
  • Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 430457.
  • Fabrigar, L. R., Porter, R. D., & Norris, M. E. (2010). Some things you should know about structural equation modeling but never thought to ask. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2), 221225.
  • Farrell, A. M., & Rudd, J. M. (2009). Factor analysis and discriminant validity: A brief review of some practical issues. Working Paper: Australia-New Zeeland Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC). Melbourne, Australia.
  • Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 13, 117.
  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1983). The “public” vs. the “experts”: Perceived vs. actual disagreement about the risks of nuclear power. In V. Covello, G. Flamm, J. Rodericks, & R. Tardiff (Eds.), Analysis of actual vs. perceived risks (pp. 235249). New York: Plenum.
  • Gray, J. R. (2004). Integration of emotion and cognitive control. Psychological Science, 13(2), 4648.
  • Griskevicius, V., Cantu, S. M., & van Vugt, M. (2012). The evolutionary bases for sustainable behavior: Implications for marketing, policy and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 31, 115128.
  • Howe, P., Markowitz, E. M., Ming-Lee, T., Ko, C-Y., & Leiserowitz, A. (2013). Global perceptions of local temperature change. Nature Climate Change, 3, 352356.
  • Helgeson, J., van der Linden, S., & Chabay, I. (2012). The role of knowledge, learning and mental models in perceptions of climate change related risks. In A. Wals & P. B. Corcoran (Eds.), Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change (pp. 329346). Wageningen Academic Publishers.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 155.
  • Iacobucci, D. (2009). Everything you always wanted to know about SEM (structural equations modeling) but were afraid to ask. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 673680.
  • Johnson, E. J., & Tverksy, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 2031.
  • Joireman, J., Truelove, H. B., & Duell, B. (2010). Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief in global warming. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 358367.
  • Keller, C., Bostrom, A., Kuttschreuter, M., Savadori, L., Spence, A., & White, M. (2012). Bringing appraisal theory to environmental risk perception: A review of conceptual approaches of the past 40 years and suggestions for future research. Journal of Risk Research, 15(3), 237256.
  • Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley.
  • Kleinginna, P. R., & Kleinginna, A. M. (1985). Cognition and affect: A reply to Lazarus and Zajonc. American Psychologist, 40(4), 470471.
  • Kobbeltved, T., Brun, W., Johnsen, B. H., & Eid, J. (2005). Risk as feelings or risk and feelings? A cross-lagged panel analysis. Journal of Risk Research, 8(5), 417437.
  • Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Lowe, L., & Visser, P. S. (2006). The origins and consequences of democratic citizens' policy agendas: A study of popular concern about global warming. Climatic Change, 77, 743.
  • Lai, V. T., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2012). Affective primacy vs. cognitive primacy: Dissolving the debate. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 243.
  • Lazarus, R. S. (1981). A cognitivist's reply to Zajonc on emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 36, 222223.
  • Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39, 124129.
  • LeDoux, J. E. (1989). Cognitive-emotional interactions in the brain. Cognition & Emotion, 3(4), 267289.
  • LeDoux, J. E. (1995). EMOTION: Clues from the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 209235.
  • LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery and values. Climatic Change, 77, 4572.
  • Leiserowitz, A., Smith, N., & Marlon, J. R. (2010). Americans' knowledge of climate change. Yale University, New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.
  • Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, E. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267286.
  • Markus, K. A. (2010). Structural equations and causal explanations: Some challenges for causal SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 654676.
  • Marx, S. M., Weber, E. U., Orlove B. S., Leiserowitz, A., Krantz, D. H., Roncoli, C., & Philips, J. (2007). Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Global Environmental Change, 17, 4758.
  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64.
  • Myers, T., Maibach, E.W., Roser-Renouf, C., Akerlof, K., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nature Climate Change, 3, 343347.
  • Nerb, J., & Spada, H. (2001). Evaluation of environmental problems: A coherence model of cognition and emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 15(4), 521551.
  • O'Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19, 461471.
  • Pearl, J. (2012). The causal foundations of structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 6891). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Pessoa, L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 148158.
  • Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2007). Affective asynchrony and the measurement of the affective attitude component. Cognition & Emotion, 21(2), 300329.
  • Phelps, E. A. (2006). Emotion and cognition: insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 2753.
  • Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research (with discussion). Sociological Methodology, 25, 111196.
  • Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotions: A structural theory. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 1136). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Roser-Renouf, C., & Nisbet, M. C. (2008). The measurement of key behavioral science constructs in climate change research. International Journal of Sustainability, 3, 3795.
  • Schaubroeck, J. (1990). Investigating reciprocal causation in organizational behavior research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 1728
  • Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, research, application. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Schwartz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513523.
  • Semenza, J. C., Hall, D. E., Wilson, D. J., Bontempo, B. D., Sailor, D. J., & George, L. A. (2008). Public perception of climate change: Voluntary mitigation and barriers to behaviour change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(5), 479487.
  • Siemer, M., Mauss, I., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Same situation-different emotions: How appraisals shape our emotions. Emotion, 7(3), 592600.
  • Sjöberg, L. (1979). Strength of belief and risk. Policy Sciences, 11, 3957.
  • Sjöberg, L. (2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 20(1), 112.
  • Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 322.
  • Slovic, P. (1992). Perception of risk: reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 117152). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 311322.
  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 13331352.
  • Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 322325.
    Direct Link:
  • Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). The rise of global warming skepticism: exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 10211032.
  • Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B.,… Miller, H. L. (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change, 1, 4649.
  • Sundblad, E. L., Biel, A., & Gärling, T. (2007). Cognitive and affective risk judgments related to climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 97106.
  • Swim, J., Clayton, S., Doherty, T., Gifford, R., Howard, G., Reser, J., & Weber, E. (2011). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. A report by the American Psychological Association's task force on the interface between psychology and global climate change.
  • Townsend, E., Spence, A., & Knowles, S. (2013). Investigating the operation of the affect heuristic: Is it an associative construct? Journal of Risk Research. 17(3), 299315.
  • Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling. In Irving B. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of psychology (2nd edn, pp. 661690). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Van Der Linden, S. (2014). Towards a new model for communicating climate change. In. S. Cohen, J. Higham, P. Peeters, & S. Gössling (Eds.), Understanding and governing sustainable tourism mobility: Psychological and behavioural approaches (pp. 243275). Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Weber, E. U. (2006). Evidence-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 77, 103120.
  • Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 332342.
  • Whitmarsh, L. (2008). Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. Journal of Risk Research, 11(3), 351374.
  • Wong, C.-S., & Law, K. S. (1999). Testing reciprocal relations by nonrecursive structural equation models using cross-sectional data. Organizational Research Methods, 2(1), 6987.
  • Yang, J. Z., & Kahlor, L. A. (2013). What, Me Worry? The Role of Affect in Information Seeking and Avoidance. Science Communication, 35(2), 189212.
  • Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151175.
  • Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39(2), 117123.
  • Zaalberg, R., Midden, C., Meijnders, A., & McCalley, T. (2009). Prevention, adaptation, and threat denial: flooding experiences in the Netherlands. Risk Analysis, 29(12), 17591778.