SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Andrews, M. (1991). Lifetimes of commitment: Aging, politics, psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Arthur, C. (1986). Dialectics of labour. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A.Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman & Co.
  • Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 7578.
    Direct Link:
  • Barker, C. (1999). Empowerment and resistance: ‘Collective effervescence’ and other accounts. In P.Bagguley, & J.Hearn (Eds.), Transforming politics: Power and resistance (pp. 1131). London: Macmillan.
  • Benford, R. D., & Hunt, S. A. (1995). Dramaturgy and social movements: The social construction and communication of power. In S. M.Lyman (Ed.), Social movements: Critiques, concepts, case studies (pp. 84109). London: Macmillan.
  • Breakwell, G. M. (1992). Processes of self-evaluation: Efficacy and estrangement. In G. M.Breakwell (Ed.), Social psychology of identity and the self-concept (pp. 3555). London: Surrey University Press.
  • Burns, D. (1992). Poll tax rebellion. Stirling: AK Press.
  • Cocking, C., & Drury, J. (2004). Generalization of efficacy as a function of collective action and intergroup relations: Involvement in an anti-roads struggle. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 417444.
  • della Porta, D. (1998). Police knowledge and protest policing: Some reflections on the Italian case. In D.della Porta, & H.Reiter (Eds.), Policing protest: The control of mass demonstrations in Western democracies (pp. 228252). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • della Porta, D. (1999). Protest, protesters and protest policing: Public discourses in Italy and Germany from the 1960s to the 1980s. In M.Giugni, D.McAdam, & C.Tilly (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. 6796). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • della Porta, D., & Reiter, H. (1998). Introduction: The policing of protest in Western Democracies. In D.della Porta, & H.Reiter (Eds.), Policing protest: The control of mass demonstrations in Western democracies (pp. 132). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd edn). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (1999). The intergroup dynamics of collective empowerment: Substantiating the social identity model of crowd behaviour. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 122.
  • Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 579604.
  • Drury, J., Reicher, S., & Stott, C. (2003). Transforming the boundaries of collective identity: From the ‘local’ anti-road campaign to ‘global’ resistance? Social Movement Studies, 2, 192212.
  • Drury, J., & Stott, C. (2001). Bias as a research strategy in participant observation: The case of intergroup conflict. Field Methods, 13, 4767.
  • Fiske, S. T. (1987). People's reactions to nuclear war. American Psychologist, 42, 207217.
  • Fox-Cardamone, L., Hinkle, S., & Hogue, M. (2000). The correlates of anti-nuclear activism: Attitudes, subjective norms and efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 484498.
  • Gallacher, W. (1936). Revolt on the Clyde. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Giugni, M. (1999). Introduction: How social movements matter: Past research, present problems, future developments. In M.Giugni, D.McAdam, & C.Tilly (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. xiiixxxiii). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Graziano, A. M., & Raulin, M. L. (2004). Research methods: A process of inquiry. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Gregoire, R., & Perlman, F. (1969). Worker-student action committees: France May '68. Detroit: Black and Red.
  • Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. (Trans. J.J.Shapiro). Boston: Beacon.
  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd edn). London: Routledge.
  • Harford, B., & Hopkins, S. (Eds.). (1984). Greenham Common: Women at the wire. London: The Women's Press.
  • Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
  • Haslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003). The ASPIRe model: Actualizing social and personal identity resources to enhance organizational outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 83113.
  • Hayes, N. (1997). Theory-led thematic analysis: Social identification in small companies. In N.Hayes (Ed.), Doing qualitative analysis in psychology (pp. 93114). Hove: Psychology Press.
  • Jasper, J. M. (1997). The art of moral protest: Culture, biography and creativity in social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 127.
  • Kellehear, A. (1993). The unobtrusive researcher: A guide to methods. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
  • Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1995). Identity and injustice: Exploring women's participation in collective action. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 4157.
  • Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1996). The social psychology of collective action: Identity, injustice and gender. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Klandermans, B. (1992). The social construction of protest and multiorganizational fields. In A. D.Morris, & C. M.Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Klein, O., Jacobs, A., Gemoets, S., Licata, L., & Lambert, S. (In press). Hidden profiles and the consensualization of social stereotypes: How information distribution affects stereotype content and sharedness. European Journal of Social Psychology.
  • Lane, T., & Roberts, K. (1971). Strike at Pilkingtons. London: Fontana.
  • Langdridge, D. (2004). Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology. Harlow, UK: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Le Bon, G. (1947). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. London: Ernest Benn. (English edition originally published 1896.)
  • Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79, 602616.
  • Marx, K. (1975). Economic and philosophical manuscripts. In Early writings. Harmondsworth: Penguin. (Trans. G.Benton. Written 1844).
  • McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of Black insurgency 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • McAdam, D. (1999). The biographical impact of activism. In M.Giugni, D.McAdam, & C.Tilly (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. 117146). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. London: Hutchinson Radius.
  • Melucci, A. (1995). The process of collective identity. In H.Johnston, & B.Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 4163). London: UCL Press.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd edn). London: Sage.
  • Miner-Rubino, K., Twenge, J. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2002). Trait self-objectification in women: Affective and personality correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 147172.
  • Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In J. P.Forgas (Ed.), Social cognition (pp. 181210). London: Academic Press.
  • Ng, S. H. (1980). The social psychology of power. London: Academic Press.
  • Orwin, R. G. (1994). Evaluating coding decisions. In H.Cooper, & L. V.Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 139162). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.
  • Pelton, L. (1974). The psychology of nonviolence. New York: Pergamon Press.
  • Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1977). Poor people's movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Vintage.
  • Reicher, S. (1996a). Social identity and social change: Rethinking the context of social psychology. In W. P.Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 317336). London: Butterworth.
  • Reicher, S. (1996b). ‘The Battle of Westminster’: Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 115134.
  • Reicher, S. (1997). Collective psychology and the psychology of the self. British Psychological Society Social Psychology Section Newsletter, 36, 315.
  • Reicher, S. (2001). The psychology of crowd dynamics. In M. A.Hogg, & R. S.Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 182208). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Reicher, S. (In press). The context of social identity: Domination, resistance and change. Political Psychology.
  • Reicher, S., & Haslam, A. S. (In press). Making groups and making history: Some lessons from the BBC Prison Experiment. In T.Postmes, & J.Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity. London: Sage.
  • Reynolds, K. J., & Platow, M. J. (2003). On the social psychology of power and powerlessness: Social power as a symptom of organizational division. In S. A.Haslam, D.van Knippenberg, N.Ellemers, & M.Platow (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 173188). New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Reynolds, K. J., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., & Ryan, M. K. (2004). Social identity as the basis of group entativity: Elaborating the case for the ‘science of social groups per se.’ In V. Y.Yzerbyt, C. M.Judd, & O.Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Contributions to the study of homogeneity, entitativity and essentialism (pp. 317333). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 124.
  • Sidanious, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
  • Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Policized collective identity. American Psychologist, 56, 319331.
  • Siobhan (2001). Strange times. In On fire: The battle of Genoa and the anti-capitalist movement (pp. 6165). One-off Press.
  • Smith, E. R. (1999). Affective and cognitive implications of a group becoming part of the self: New models of prejudice and of the self-concept. In D.Abrams, & M. A.Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 183196). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Doosje, B. (2001). The (il)legitimacy of ingroup bias: From social reality to social resistance. In J. T.Jost, & B.Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice and intergroup relations (pp. 332362). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stock, W. A. (1994). Systematic coding for research synthesis. In H.Cooper, & L. V.Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 125138). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Stott, C., & Drury, J. (1999). The intergroup dynamics of empowerment: A social identity model. In P.Bagguley, & J.Hearn (Eds.), Transforming politics: Power and resistance (pp. 3245). London: Macmillan.
  • Stott, C., & Drury, J. (2000). Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the ‘poll tax riot’. Human Relations, 53, 247273.
  • Stott, C., & Drury, J. (2004). The importance of social structure and social interaction in stereotype consensus and content: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 1123.
  • Stott, C. J., & Reicher, S. (1998). Crowd action as intergroup process: Introducing the police perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 509529.
  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G.Austin, & S.Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 3347). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Turner, J. C. (1981). The experimental social psychology of intergroup behaviour. In J. C.Turner, & H.Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 66101). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. J., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454463.
  • Veenstra, K., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). Willingness to participate in industrial protest: Exploring social identification in context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 153172.
  • Waddington, D. (1992). Contemporary issues in public disorder: A comparative and historical approach. London: Routledge.
  • Willig, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. Buckingham: Open University Press.